Skip to content

· Private foundation

Theodore H Sedler Scholarship Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$185k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$68k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$751kHealth$15kScience & Tech$9kReligion$3k
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $76k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $68k
$2,568
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY$67,500
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA$38,750
ND STATE COLLEGE OF SCIENCE$27,500
VALLEY CITY STATE UNIVERSITY$10,000
BISMARCK STATE COLLEGE$5,000
CONCORDIA COLLEGE$5,000
MAYVILLE STATE UNIVERSITY$3,750
SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY$3,750
GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$3,750
QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY$2,568
MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY$2,500
CENTRAL LAKES COLLEGE$2,500
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA$2,500
CROWN COLLEGE$2,500
UNIV OF MN - TWIN CITIES$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN: $3k → 13%CENTRAL LAKES COLLEGE: $3k → 10%UNIV OF MN - TWIN CITIES: $6k → 11%MINNESOTA STATE UNIV -MOORHEAD: $5k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN-STPAUL: $5k → 14%Minnesota State University Mankato: $4k → 15%PALMER COLLEGE OF CHIROPRACTIC: $4k → 12%KANSAS UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF VET: $3k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD: $3k → 11%GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $4k → 13%MAYVILLE STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 9%ND STATE COLLEGE OF SCIENCE: $35k → 10%Minot State University: $4k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF MARY: $3k → 10%VALLEY CITY STATE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 12%NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY: $68k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA: $39k → 13%American Type Culture Collection: $4k → 9%SOUTHEAST TECHNICAL INSTITUTE: $4k → 9%PRESENTATION COLLEGE: $3k → 11%SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 13%SOUTH DAKOTA SCHOOL OF MINES & TECH: $3k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA: $3k → 20%UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN: $3k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $4k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN-STPAUL: $4k → 14%ND STATE COLLEGE OF SCIENCE: $28k → 10%VALLEY CITY STATE UNIVERSITY: $6k → 12%NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY: $53k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA: $30k → 13%ND STATE COLLEGE OF SCIENCE: $18k → 10%VALLEY CITY STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 12%NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY: $49k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA: $28k → 13%ND STATE COLLEGE OF SCIENCE: $16k → 10%VALLEY CITY STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 12%NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY: $48k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA: $16k → 13%ND STATE COLLEGE OF SCIENCE: $13k → 10%VALLEY CITY STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 12%NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY: $44k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA: $15k → 13%CONCORDIA COLLEGE: $5k → 11%NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY: $40k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA: $6k → 13%CONCORDIA COLLEGE: $5k → 11%NORTHWESTERN HEALTH SCIENCES UNIVERSITY: $5k → 11%CONCORDIA COLLEGE: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
MT
ND
MN
WI
SD
IA
CT
NE
VA
KS
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$730k · 21 repeat orgs$47k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
12

Total granted

$730k
$32k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+12%

Still filing today

29%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NF
    NDSCS FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $111k · revenue +790%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN - ST PAUL
    5× · 2021–2025 · $14k · revenue +15%
  • UO
    University of Mary
    5× · 2021–2025 · $10k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • MS
    Minnesota State University Mankato
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
  • ST
    SOUTHEAST TECHNICAL INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
  • AT
    AMERICAN TYPE CULTURE COLLECTION
    one grant, 2020 · $4k · revenue +12%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cornell College

Cornell college offers an innovative and rigorous learning community where faculty and staff collaborate with students to develop the intellectual curiosity, creativity and moral courage necessary for a lifetime of learning and engaged…

Education
2
Luther College

Founded by the norwegian evangelical lutheran church in 1861, luther college is a four-year, residential liberal arts institution. luther welcomes students of all backgrounds to engage in a way of learning that moves beyond immediate…

Education
3
Dordt University

As an institution of higher education committed to the reformed christian perspective, dordt university equips students, alumni, and the broader community to work effectively toward christ-centered renewal in all aspects of contemporary…

Education
4
St Mary's University

St. marys university, as a catholic marianist university, fosters the formation of people in faith and educates leaders for the common good through community, integrated liberal arts and professional education, and academic excellence.

—
5
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
6
Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities

Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities accredits institutions of higher education by applying evidence-informed standards and processes to support continuous improvements and promote equitable student achievement and success.

Education
7
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
8
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
9
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
10
Union College

Union college is a seventh-day adventist community of higher education, inspired by jesus christ, and dedicated to empowering students to learn, serve, and lead.

Education
11
St Olaf College

St. olaf college challenges students to excel in the liberal arts, examine faith and values, and explore meaningful vocation in an inclusive, globally engaged community nourished by lutheran tradition.

Education
12
North Central University

North central university is a christian university with a commitment to academic excellence.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crown College; the most unlike its peers is Ndscs Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY: $300,675 · OtherNORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA: $133,428 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTAVALLEY CITY STATE UNIVERSITY: $31,250 · OtherCONCORDIA COLLEGE CORPORATION: $22,500 · Other+25 more: $129,270 · Other+25 moreNDSCS FOUNDATION: $111,250 · EducationNDSCS FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN - ST PAUL: $13,750 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NORTHWES…University of Mary: $10,000 · EducationUniversity of MaryNORTHWESTERN HEALTH SCIENCES UNIVERSITY: $8,750 · EducationNORTHWESTERN HEALTH SC…PALMER COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $6,250 · Education+3 more: $6,250 · EducationAMERICAN TYPE CULTURE COLLECTION: $3,750 · Science & Tech
Other$617,123Education$156,250Science & Tech$3,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNDSCS FOUNDATION: $111,250 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetCONCORDIA COLLEGE CORPORATION: $22,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN - ST PAUL: $13,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Mary: $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWESTERN HEALTH SCIENCES UNIVERSITY: $8,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPALMER COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $6,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN TYPE CULTURE COLLECTION: $3,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPresentation College: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROWN COLLEGE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHLAND COLLEGE: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NDSCS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CONCORDIA COLLEGE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN - ST PAUL ↗
  • Who funds University of Mary ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWESTERN HEALTH SCIENCES UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PALMER COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN TYPE CULTURE COLLECTION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD ↗
  • Who funds Presentation College ↗
  • Who funds CROWN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds NORTHLAND COLLEGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Helen Gough Fdn TrustMN13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Helen Gough Fdn Trust · The Eagle Foundation · National Collegiate Athletic Association · Xcel Energy Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Theodore H Sedler Scholarship Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Theodore H Sedler Scholarship Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • University of Hartford: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Theodore H Sedler Scholarship’s filings →

More from the funding graph