· Public charity
ThedaCare Family of Foundations Inc
To inspire giving and provide funding for thedacare initiatives that help people experience exceptional care.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k7 grants · $139k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $216k
- $250k+4 grants · $4.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THEDACARE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER - NEENAH INC | $1,884,016 |
| THEDACARE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER - APPLETON INC | $1,405,409 |
| THEDACARE INC | $478,894 |
| THEDACARE MEDICAL CENTER - SHAWANO INC | $466,003 |
| THEDACARE MEDICAL CENTER - NEW LONDON INC | $152,345 |
| THEDACARE MEDICAL CENTER - WAUPACA INC | $64,002 |
| THEDACARE MEDICAL CENTER - BERLIN INC | $48,737 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB FOX VALLEY INC | $25,000 |
| SHAWANO PATHWAYS ORGANIZATION FOR KIDS ENVIRONMENT AND SAFETY | $15,000 |
| THEDACARE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER - APPLETON VOLUNTEERS | $15,000 |
| THEDACARE MEDICAL CENTER - WILD ROSE INC | $14,785 |
| FOX VALLEY MEMORY PROJECT | $10,000 |
| TRI-COUNTY DENTAL CLINIC | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $305k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
17 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TRThedaCare Regional Medical Center - Neenah Inc9× · 2017–2025 · $50M · revenue +53%
- TIThedaCare Inc9× · 2017–2025 · $5.4M · revenue +29%
- TRThedaCare Regional Medical Center - Appleton Inc9× · 2017–2025 · $4.9M · revenue +80%
Funded once
- UWUNITED WAY FOX CITIES INCone grant, 2020 · $45k · revenue +5%
- NPNEENAH POLICE BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION INCone grant, 2019 · $35k
- SOSOURCES OF STRENGTH INCone grant, 2020 · $32k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Reedsburg area medical center, always there, going beyond the expected to provide compassionate, quality, and efficient health care.
To inspire giving and provide funding for thedacare initiatives that help people experience exceptional care.
Through excellence in healthcare and compassionate service, we care for our community.
Ucare iowa will improve the health of our members through innovative services and partnerships across communities.
Memorial medical center, inc. dba tamarack health ashland medical center will reach out as a trusted partner to improve the health and wellness for people of our south shore region of lake superior.
The lake area free clinic is the medical and dental home to low-income residents of waukesha county. the mission is to provide high-quality comprehensive health care to those in need.
Madison regional health system serves as a community health focal point through the provision of compassionate, quality, and innovative care.
To advance the health of our communities through excellence and discovery, inspiring each person to live their unique, best life.
Together we are dedicated to improve the health and wellness of all generations through high quality, compassionate, and patient-centered care.
The mission of oconto hospital & medical center is to provide 24-hour local access to effective, efficient health, wellness and preventative services to oconto and the surrounding rural communities. toward this purpose oconto hospital &…
The mission of burnett medical center is to provide compassionate, comprehensive, community healthcare that exceeds our customer's expectations. our mission, as well as our vision and values, serves as a guideline for daily decision making…
Riverside medical center is committed to improving the well-being of the communities it serves, regardless of an individual's ability to pay. in addition to the day-to-day services provided to patients, riverside medical center reaches…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is ThedaCare Medical Center - Waupaca Inc and the most unlike its peers is Shawano Pathways Organization for Kids Environment & Safety. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ThedaCare Regional Medical Center - Neenah Inc ↗
- Who funds ThedaCare Inc ↗
- Who funds ThedaCare Regional Medical Center - Appleton Inc ↗
- Who funds ThedaCare Medical Center - Berlin Inc ↗
- Who funds ThedaCare Medical Center - Shawano Inc ↗
- Who funds ThedaCare Medical Center - New London Inc ↗
- Who funds ThedaCare Medical Center - Waupaca Inc ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB FOX VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds TRI-COUNTY COMMUNITY DENTAL CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds ThedaCare Medical Center - Wild Rose Inc ↗
- Who funds VALLEY VNA HEALTH SYSTEMS INC ↗
- Who funds COTS INC ↗
- Who funds SHAWANO AREA MATTHEW 25 INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY FOX CITIES INC ↗
- Who funds THEDACARE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER- APPLETON VOLUNTEERS ↗
- Who funds SHAWANO PATHWAYS ORGANIZATION FOR KIDS ENVIRONMENT & SAFETY ↗
- Who funds GREATER FOX CITIES AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
- Who funds MISSION OF HOPE HOUSE OF WI INC ↗
- Who funds Oxford House Inc ↗
- Who funds NEW MENTAL HEALTH CONNECTION INC ↗
- Who funds GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF NORTH CENTRAL WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds Fox Valley Memory Project Inc ↗
- Who funds OSHKOSH AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds RURAL HEALTH INITIATIVE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation for the Fox Valley Region Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · J J Keller Foundation Inc · Oshkosh Area Community Foundation Corporation · US Ventureschmidt Family Foundation · The Boldt Family Fund Inc · Oshkosh Area United Way Inc · Basic Needs Giving Partnership Inc · The Clarence Wallace & Dolores Lynch Wallace Family Foundation · Oshkosh Corporation Foundation Inc · Theda and Tamblin Clark Smith Family Foundation Inc · Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization ThedaCare Family of Foundations Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Oxford House Inc — 8% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.