Skip to content
The Zarley Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Zarley Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$195k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$95k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$530kHealth$358kReligion$315kFood & Nutrition$175kHousing & Shelter$170kEnvironment$65kRecreation & Sports$45kArts & Culture$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $147k
$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Green Valley Christian Center$95,000
Andys Outreach Fund Inc$52,000
Nevada Partnership for Homeless Youth$20,000
Homeless Helpers$10,000
Street Dogz$10,000
Maui Memorial Hospital Auxiliary$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $565k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 52% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%JEWEL LEVINE FOUNDATION INC: $50k → 10%ANDY'S OUTREACH FUND INC: $100k → 15%JEWEL LEVINE FOUNDATION INC: $25k → 10%Andys Outreach Fund Inc: $52k → 15%JEWEL LEVINE FOUNDATION INC: $25k → 10%ANDY'S OUTREACH FUND INC: $5k → 15%JEWEL LEVINE FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 10%ANDYS OUTREACH FUND INC: $5k → 15%CASA PACIFICA: $43k → 10%ANDYS OUTREACH FUND INC: $5k → 15%CASA PACIFICA: $40k → 10%Women Helping Women: $25k → 9%CASA PACIFICA: $40k → 10%Women Helping Women: $20k → 9%SAFE HOUSE INC: $25k → 13%SAFE HOUSE INC: $25k → 13%SAFE HOUSE INC: $20k → 13%SAFE HOUSE INC: $10k → 13%SAFE HOUSE INC: $10k → 13%Homeless Helpers: $10k → 13%SERVING OUR KIDS FOUNDATION INC: $25k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
NV
CA
KY
VA
MD
DC
HI
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 20 repeat orgs$265k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
12

Total granted

$1.4M
$245k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+3%

Still filing today

75%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterRecreation & SportsReligionFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AO
    ANDY'S OUTREACH FUND INC
    5× · 2017–2025 · $167k · revenue +44%
  • TJ
    THE JEWEL LEVINE FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $105k · revenue +4% · 62% of their budget
  • BC
    BROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $95k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue +3%
  • SO
    SERVING OUR KIDS FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +24%
  • SH
    Starkey Hearing Foundation
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue -80%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Las Vegas Rescue Mission

Through feeding the hungry, support, and care, we provide redemption, recovery, and re-entry to the homeless, addicted, and those in need.

Human Services
2
Safe Nesttemporary Assistance for

Safe nest's mission is to provide comprehensive, collaborative, and innovative services for everyone affected by domestic and sexual violence while passionatley working to end this shared epidemic.

Human Services
3
Healthy Nevada
Health
4
The Shade Tree Inc

The shade tree, inc. (organization), a nevada nonprofit corporation, provides temporary shelter for homeless and abused women and children in crisis and offers life-changing services promoting stability, dignity, and self reliance. the…

—
5
Community Action Against Rape

Offering hope, help and healing to those affected by sexual violence and exploitation. making an impact in the core services of: prevention, education, advocacy and counseling.

Crime & Legal
6
Sight for Life

Sight for life provided ophthalmology patients in las vegas with resources to pay for patient medicine bills and treatments.

Health
7
The San Francisco Particular Council of the Society of St Vincent De Paul

The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.

Human Services
8
Interval House

The mission of the organization is to ensure safety and stability for people who are battered, abused, homeless or at risk; to create public awareness about the epidemic of violence; and to mobilize the community to prevent violence and…

Human Services
9
Aid for Aids of Nevada (Afan)

To provide support and advocacy for adults and children living with and affected by hiv/aids in southern nevada. works to reduce the infection through prevention education to eliminate fear, prejudice, and the stigma associated with the…

—
10
Safe Embrace

Safe Embrace is committed to ending the cycle of domestic and sexual violence with innovative prevention and intervention services. We help victims of domestic abuse, sexual assault, and human trafficking become survivors by providing…

Health
11
Southern Arizona Aids Foundation

To promote health, well-being, and social justice for those living with HIV, LGBTQ+ individuals, and communities marginalized by society.

Health
12
Safehouse Denver Inc

Safehouse denver assists adult, children, and youth in reclaiming their right to a life free from domestic violence. the agency provides a broad spectrum of culturally competent, trauma-informed services, including but not limited to,…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Women Helping Women; the most unlike its peers is Saint Therese Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/28
Grantees still filing
20/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GREEN VALLEY CHRISTIAN CENTER: $190,000 · OtherGREEN VALLEY CHRISTIAN CENTERSAINT THERESE CENTER HIV OUTREACH: $100,000 · OtherSAINT THERESE CENTER HIV OUTREACHHale Kau Kau: $95,000 · OtherHale Kau KauBROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC: $95,000 · OtherBROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INCOUR FATHERS HOUSE SOUP KITCHEN INC: $70,000 · OtherOUR FATHERS HOUSE SOUP KITCHEN INCMAUI MEMORIAL HOSPITAL AUXILIARY: $47,500 · OtherMAUI MEMORIAL HOSPITAL AUXILIARYLOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER: $40,000 · OtherLOS ANGELES LGBT CENTERINTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · Other+10 more: $80,000 · Other+10 moreANDY'S OUTREACH FUND INC: $167,000 · Human ServicesANDY'S OUTREACH FUND INCCasa Pacifica Centers for Children & Families: $122,500 · Human ServicesCasa Pacifica Centers for Children & …THE JEWEL LEVINE FOUNDATION INC: $105,000 · Human ServicesTHE JEWEL LEVINE FOUNDATION INCSAFE HOUSE INC: $90,000 · Human ServicesSAFE HOUSE INCWOMEN HELPING WOMEN: $45,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN HELPING WOMENSERVING OUR KIDS FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · Human Services+1 more: $10,000 · Human ServicesHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $100,000 · Housing & ShelterHOMES FOR …NEVADA PARTNERSHIP FOR HOMELESS YOUTH: $40,000 · Housing & ShelterNEVADA PAR…CASAS POR CRISTO: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterCASAS POR …THREE SQUARE: $80,000 · Food & NutritionMaalaea Village Association: $65,000 · Community ImprovementStarkey Hearing Foundation: $25,000 · HealthALS UNITED NEVADA: $20,000 · HealthTHE AMERICAN TINNITUS ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · HealthAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $5,000 · HealthEASTER SEALS DUPAGE & THE FOX VALLEY REGION: $5,000 · HealthREBEL HOCKEY CLUB: $45,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$742,500Human Services$564,500Housing & Shelter$160,000Food & Nutrition$80,000Community Improvement$65,000Health$65,000Recreation & Sports$45,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetANDY'S OUTREACH FUND INC: $167,000 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetCasa Pacifica Centers for Children & Families: $122,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JEWEL LEVINE FOUNDATION INC: $105,000 over 4y, 62% of budgetHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC: $95,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSAFE HOUSE INC: $90,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetTHREE SQUARE: $80,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOUR FATHERS HOUSE SOUP KITCHEN INC: $70,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetMaalaea Village Association: $65,000 over 3y, 19% of budgetMAUI MEMORIAL HOSPITAL AUXILIARY: $47,500 over 7y, 75% of budgetWOMEN HELPING WOMEN: $45,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetREBEL HOCKEY CLUB: $45,000 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetNEVADA PARTNERSHIP FOR HOMELESS YOUTH: $40,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetLOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSERVING OUR KIDS FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetStarkey Hearing Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetALS UNITED NEVADA: $20,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetCASAS POR CRISTO: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE AMERICAN TINNITUS ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetVEGAS GOLDEN KNIGHTS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSTREET DOGZ: $10,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetHomeless Helpers: $10,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEASTER SEALS DUPAGE & THE FOX VALLEY REGION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mondays DarkMgm Resorts FoundationArthur J Gallagher Fo…Enterprise Holdings F…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…The Bank of America C…Charities Aid Foundat…Raymond James Charita…Paypal Charitable Giv…Network for GoodThe Blackbaud Giving …American Online Givin…
Mondays DarkNV13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mondays Dark · Mgm Resorts Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Zarley Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Zarley Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Zarley Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home