· Private foundation
The Wyman Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k40 grants · $124k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $204k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BOULDER COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION | $39,500 |
| MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $26,500 |
| JOHN HOPKINS CANCER CENTER | $25,000 |
| JOHNS HOPKINS HEART VASCULAR INSTITUTE | $25,000 |
| THE METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART | $25,000 |
| HUMANE SOCIETY OF BOULDER VALLEY | $25,000 |
| HEALTH NETWORK FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION | $12,500 |
| AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE | $10,000 |
| ACADEMY ART MUSEUM | $9,500 |
| ST MATTHEWS UNITED METHODIST CHURCH | $7,500 |
| FOOTHILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTO | $7,500 |
| FRACTURED ATLAS | $7,500 |
| TRU COMMUNITY CARE | $5,000 |
| NYU LANGONE HEALTH | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $83k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 57% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
49 repeat relationships — 43 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BCBOULDER COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION3× · 2023–2025 · $170k · revenue +13%
- THTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF BOULDER VALLEY INC4× · 2022–2025 · $80k · revenue +22%
- MHMemorial Hospital Foundation Inc4× · 2022–2025 · $79k · revenue ×18
Funded once
- TNTHE NEW PRESS INCone grant, 2021 · $75k · revenue -31%
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $60k · revenue +26%- FSFOUR SEASONS HOMEOWNER'S FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.
To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.
A non-profit established in 1998, the cultural landscape foundation (tclf) connects people to places. tclf educates and engages the public to make our shared landscape heritage more visible, identify its value, and empower its stewards.…
See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…
Provide post-secondary education of excellence.
The Television Academy is dedicated to celebrating excellence, innovation and the advancement of the telecommunications arts and sciences through recognition, education and leadership, while fostering a diverse, inclusive and accessible…
Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
The museum is an educational corporation formed to ignite a life-long passion for exploring, discovering, and valuing nature and science.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mid Shore Community Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Metropolitan Museum of Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BOULDER COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF BOULDER VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds Memorial Hospital Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds THE NEW PRESS INC ↗
- Who funds THE COUNTRY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION ↗
- Who funds TALBOT HOSPICE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC ↗
- Who funds TRU COMMUNITY CARE ↗
- Who funds MERIDIAN INTERNATIONAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FOR ALL SEASONS INC ↗
- Who funds CHILD AND FAMILY ADVOCACY PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds ACADEMY ART MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds LYFORD CAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MID SHORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AVALON FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY ↗
- Who funds CASA OF TALBOT COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds TALBOT HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds FRACTURED ATLAS INC ↗
- Who funds CHEF ANN FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Llandaff Family Trust · The Seip Family Foundation Limited Eevercore Trust CO C/O Ashley Ferriello · Mid Shore Community Foundation Inc · Watson Stone Family Foundation Inc · Richard J and Ellen G Bodorff Charitable Foundation Inc · Dock Street Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · T & M Mitchell Fdn Dima-Blrk · Grayce B Kerr Fund Inc · Dalton Family Foundation · Alan M & Mildred S Ravenal Foundation · Van Strum Foundation 8833023
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Wyman Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- For All Seasons Inc — 22% of income from government
- Chesapeake Bay Maritime Museum Inc — 17% of income from government
- Shorerivers Inc — 13% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- Avalon Foundation Inc — 6% of income from government
- Academy Art Museum Inc — 5% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.