Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Wurtele Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5.0M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$32MEducation$6.0MPhilanthropy$1.3MReligion$600kHousing & Shelter$500k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MINNESOTA ORCHESTRA$5,000,000
THE ARTS PARTNERSHIP$1,000,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SMITH COLLEGE: $2.0M → 12%THE MINNESOTA OPERA: $4.0M → 11%EPISCOPAL HOUSE OF PRAYER: $550k → 11%THE ARTS PARTNERSHIP: $1.0M → 14%SMITH COLLEGE: $2.0M → 12%THE MINNESOTA OPERA: $4.0M → 11%EPISCOPAL HOUSE OF PRAYER: $50k → 11%THE ARTS PARTNERSHIP: $1.0M → 14%SMITH COLLEGE: $2.0M → 12%THE MINNESOTA OPERA: $4.0M → 11%THE ARTS PARTNERSHIP: $1.0M → 14%THE MINNESOTA OPERA: $4.0M → 11%THE ARTS PARTNERSHIP: $1.0M → 14%ARTSPACE PROJECTS: $500k → 11%THE ARTS PARTNERSHIP: $1.0M → 14%MACPHAIL CENTER FOR MUSIC: $250k → 11%MACPHAIL CENTER FOR MUSIC: $250k → 11%GREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY: $250k → 11%GREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY: $250k → 11%GREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY: $250k → 11%GREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY: $250k → 11%GREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY: $250k → 11%THE LOFT LITERARY CENTER: $30k → 11%THE LOFT LITERARY CENTER: $30k → 11%THE LOFT LITERARY CENTER: $30k → 11%MINNESOTA ORCHESTRA: $5.0M → 11%MINNESOTA ORCHESTRA: $2.5M → 11%MINNESOTA ORCHESTRA: $2.5M → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$39M · 8 repeat orgs$500k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
1

Total granted

$39M
$500k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-7%
0%

Still filing today

88%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    The Minnesota Opera
    4× · 2018–2023 · $16M · revenue -5% · 36% of their budget
  • MO
    MINNESOTA ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $10M · revenue -14%
  • TT
    THE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $6.0M · revenue -25%

Funded once

  • AP
    Artspace Projects Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $500k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Saint Paul Chamber Orchestra Society

To enrich the Twin Cities community by sharing distinctive and engaging chamber orchestra performances. We are committed to inclusivity and strive to provide all people in our community with opportunities to connect with our music.

Arts & Culture
2
San Francisco Opera Association

We believe opera is a uniquely compelling, entertaining and emotionally thrilling art form. our mission is to bring together growing audiences to experience opera's transformative power.

Arts & Culture
3
Guthrie Theater Foundation

The guthrie theater engages exceptional theater artists in the exploration of both classic and contemporary plays, connecting the community we serve to one another and to the world. through its extraordinary artists, staff and facility,…

Arts & Culture
4
Women's Project & Productions Inc

Wp theater is the nation's oldest and largest theater company dedicated to developing, producing, and promoting the work of women+ at every stage of their careers. for over four decades we have served as leaders of a global movement…

Arts & Culture
5
Schubert Club the

Schubert club creates inspiring musical experiences that contribute to the cultural vibrancy of the twin cities community through concert presentations, music education and student scholarship programs, and musuem exhibits.

Arts & Culture
6
Nashville Symphony Association

The Nashville Symphony inspires and engages a diverse and growing community with extraordinary live orchestral music experiences. As Middle Tennessee continues to grow and transform, the Nashville Symphony will be a financially robust,…

Arts & Culture
7
Park Square Theatre

To enrich the community by producing and presenting exceptional live theatre that touches the heart, engages the mind and delights the spirit.

—
8
Theater Mu Incorporated

Theater mu produces great performances born of arts, equity, and justice from the heart of the asian american experience.

Arts & Culture
9
Children's Theatre Company and School

Children's Theatre Company exists to create extraordinary theater experiences that educate, challenge, and inspire young people and their communities.

Arts & Culture
10
Bach Society of Minnesota

The mission of bach society of minnesota is to build a diverse community of music lovers who perform, promote, and appreciate the music of j.s. bach and those he inspired.

Arts & Culture
11
Theater Latte Da

The mission of theater latte' da is to create new connections between story, music, artist and audience by exploring and expanding the art of musical theater.

Arts & Culture
12
The Fischoff National Chamber Music Association Inc

To promote and encourage development, awareness, and appreciation of the art of chamber music and its role in our culture through education programs, chamber music performances, and sponsorshop of the fischoff chamber music competition.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Minnesota Orchestral Association; the most unlike its peers is The Trustees of the Smith College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
2/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Minnesota Opera: $16,000,000 · Arts & CultureThe Minnesota OperaMINNESOTA ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION: $10,000,000 · Arts & CultureMINNESOTA ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATIONThe Arts Partnership: $5,000,000 · Arts & CultureThe Arts Partnership+3 more: $1,090,000 · Arts & CultureTHE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE: $6,000,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF T…GREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY: $1,250,000 · PhilanthropyEPISCOPAL HOUSE OF PRAYER: $600,000 · Other
Arts & Culture$32,090,000Education$6,000,000Philanthropy$1,250,000Other$600,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Minnesota Opera: $16,000,000 over 4y, 36% of budgetMINNESOTA ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION: $10,000,000 over 3y, 6.5% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE: $6,000,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetThe Arts Partnership: $5,000,000 over 5y, 19% of budgetGREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY: $1,250,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetMACPHAIL CENTER FOR MUSIC: $500,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetArtspace Projects Inc: $500,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetTHE LOFT INC: $90,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Minneapolis FoundationMN15.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · The McKnight Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Wurtele Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Wurtele Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • The Trustees of the Smith College: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Wurtele’s filings →

More from the funding graph