· Public charity
The Wright Center for Graduate Medical Education
(see on schedule o)
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $71k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $238k
- $250k+3 grants · $1.9M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| The Wright Center Medical Group | $1,090,426 |
| Scranton Area Foundation | $500,000 |
| Wayne Memorial Community Health Centers | $268,645 |
| Unity Healthcare INC | $101,531 |
| Health Point CHC | $72,561 |
| Health Source of Ohio | $64,325 |
| America250PA | $36,000 |
| El Rio Health | $34,592 |
| Hospice of the Sacred Heart | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +12% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $136k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TWThe Wright Center Medical Group3× · 2020–2025 · $3.4M · revenue +102%
- WMWAYNE MEMORIAL COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS2× · 2024–2025 · $382k · revenue +19%
- ATA T Still University of Health Sciences4× · 2019–2022 · $278k · revenue +43%
Funded once
- NMNATIVITY MIGUEL SCRANTONone grant, 2023 · $38k
- STSCRANTON TOMORROWone grant, 2023 · $18k · revenue -17%
- CDCommonwealth Dental Care Initiativeone grant, 2023 · $13k · revenue -100%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of upmc western maryland is to serve our community by providing outstanding patient care and to shape tomorrow's health system through clinical & technological innovation, research and education.
UPMC Williamsport is a subsidiary of UPMC Susquehanna. The mission of UPMC Susquehanna and its subsidiaries is to serve the community by providing outstanding patient care and shaping tomorrow's health care through clinical and…
We heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value supported by education and clinical research.
As the parent entity of a blended health organization, highmark health seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people and communities it serves by providing affordable, accessible and high-quality healthcare.
Our community-based and controlled health care system exists to improve regional access to a wide array of premier primary care and advanced health services while supporting a reverence for life and the worth and dignity of each individual.
The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.
The mission of penn highlands mon valley is to enhance the health of the residents of the mid-monongahela valley area by providing outstanding healthcare services.
Susquehanna physician services is a subsidiary of the exempt entity upmc suquehanna. our vision is to create an integrated community health system that delivers world class care. our values are to carefully place our patients and their…
We heal, comfort, and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value supported by education and clinical research.
To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.
The center provides comprehensive health and dental services for residents of scranton pa and other communities in lackawanna and surrounding counties.
Penn state health hampden medical center's mission is to continually improve the health and well-being of the people in pennsylvania. the organization provides patients with excellent, compassionate and culturally responsive and equitable…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Healthsource of Ohio Inc and the most unlike its peers is A T Still University of Health Sciences. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds The Wright Center Medical Group ↗
- Who funds SCRANTON AREA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WAYNE MEMORIAL COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS ↗
- Who funds WYCKOFF HEIGHTS MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds A T Still University of Health Sciences ↗
- Who funds HEALTHPOINT ↗
- Who funds Healthsource of Ohio Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITY HEALTH CARE INC ↗
- Who funds Philadelphia Visitor Center Corporation ↗
- Who funds EL RIO SANTA CRUZ NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds WILKES UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds SCRANTON TOMORROW ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF THE SACRED HEART ↗
- Who funds Commonwealth Dental Care Initiative ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF LACKAWANNA WAYNE AND PIKE COUNTIES ↗
- Who funds THE INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds GEISINGER COMMONWEALTH SCH OF MED ↗
- Who funds Marywood University ↗
- Who funds LACKAWANNA PRO BONO INC ↗
- Who funds INTEND HEALTH STRATEGIES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Wright Center Medical Group · Moses Taylor Foundation Inc · Scranton Area Foundation Inc · Ppl Foundation · Northeastern Pennsylvania Health Care Foundation · Robert H Spitz Foundation · The Hawk Family Foundation · The Honesdale National Bank Foundation · Benco Family Foundation Fka Cohen Family Charitable Foundation · Allone Charities · William G McGowan Charitable Fund · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Wright Center for Graduate Medical Education funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.