Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Workman Family Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$85k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$333kArts & Culture$255kReligion$130kHuman Services$93kEducation$70kHousing & Shelter$50kAnimals$37kPhilanthropy$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $75k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PRISMA HEALTH FOUNDATION$35,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$20,000
SALVATION ARMY$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
PAWMETTO LIFELINE$5,000
OLIVER GOSPEL MISSION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHILDREN'S TRUST OF SC: $3k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$908k · 11 repeat orgs$133k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +68% since the first grant, against +47% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
6

Total granted

$908k
$133k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%
+47%

Still filing today

45%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHealthHuman ServicesAnimalsEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PH
    PRISMA HEALTH MIDLANDS FOUNDATION F/K/A PALMETTO HEALTH FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2019 · $178k · revenue +68%
  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2025 · $70k · revenue +112%
  • PO
    PROMISE OF HOPE MINISTRIES D/B/A HOMEPLACE MINISTRIES
    3× · 2017–2019 · $45k · revenue +332%

Funded once

  • SC
    SOUTH CAROLINA NETWORK
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • PO
    PROMISE OF HOPE MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • GARY SINISE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +47%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Shield of Faith Missions

Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.

Religion
2
South Carolina Ems Foundation
—
3
Claiborne Medical Center

Claiborne Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of a patient's ability to pay.

Health
4
Gaston Memorial Hospital Inc

To provide compassionate, exceptional and highly reliable care.

Health
5
Prisma Health-Upstate Foundation

The Prisma Health-Upstate Foundation is committed to improving the health of the communities it serves in the Upstate. We make connections between grateful patients, corporate partners, visionary organizations, and individuals of all ages…

Philanthropy
6
Gaston Memorial Hospital Foundation Inc

To engage and inspire our community to support caromont health in providing compassionate, exceptional and highly reliable care.

Health
7
Methodist Medical Center

Methodist Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health regardless of a patient's ability to pay.

Health
8
Thompson Cancer Survival Center

Thompson Cancer Survival Center provides support services for cancer patients, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of a patient's ability to…

—
9
Cumberland Medical Center

Cumberland Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Health
10
The Daniel O Morris South Carolina Low Country Heritage Trust
Philanthropy
11
Sarasota Memorial Healthcare Foundation Inc

Sarasota memorial healthcare foundation is the philanthropic partner that helps sarasota memorial health care system bring world-class care to our community.

Health
12
Chatt Foundation

To meet the most basic needs of hungry, homeless, and vulnerable individuals in the chattanooga community while providing a clear path to self-sufficiency. services include access to food, shelter, clothing, hygiene facilities, counseling,…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Promise of Hope Ministries D/B/a Homeplace Ministries; the most unlike its peers is Oliver Gospel Mission. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SC STATE MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $205,000 · OtherSC STATE MUSEUM FOUNDATIONPRISMA HEALTH FOUNDATION: $155,000 · OtherPRISMA HEALTH FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $72,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSALVATION ARMY: $70,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYSOUTH CAROLINA NETWORK: $50,000 · OtherSOUTH CAROLINA NETWORKPROMISE OF HOPE MINISTRIES: $50,000 · OtherPROMISE OF HOPE MINISTRIESHOMEPLACE MINISTRIES: $40,000 · OtherHOMEPLACE MINISTRIES+3 more: $20,000 · OtherPRISMA HEALTH MIDLANDS FOUNDATION F/K/A PALMETTO HEALTH FOUNDATION: $178,000 · HealthPRISMA HEALTH MIDLA…PROMISE OF HOPE MINISTRIES D/B/A HOMEPLACE MINISTRIES: $45,000 · ReligionOliver Gospel Mission: $35,000 · ReligionSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $70,000 · EducationPAWMETTO LIFELINE: $27,000 · AnimalsGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $20,000 · PhilanthropyCENTRAL CAROLINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyCHILDREN'S TRUST OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $2,500 · Human Services
Other$662,500Health$178,000Religion$80,000Education$70,000Animals$27,000Philanthropy$25,000Human Services$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPRISMA HEALTH MIDLANDS FOUNDATION F/K/A PALMETTO HEALTH FOUNDATION: $178,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $70,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPROMISE OF HOPE MINISTRIES D/B/A HOMEPLACE MINISTRIES: $45,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetOliver Gospel Mission: $35,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetPAWMETTO LIFELINE: $27,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL CAROLINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S TRUST OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PRISMA HEALTH MIDLANDS FOUNDATION F/K/A PALMETTO HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PROMISE OF HOPE MINISTRIES D/B/A HOMEPLACE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds Oliver Gospel Mission ↗
  • Who funds PAWMETTO LIFELINE ↗
  • Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL CAROLINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S TRUST OF SOUTH CAROLINA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lillian S Smith FoundationSC15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lillian S Smith Foundation · Dorothy D Smith Charitable Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Michael J Mungo Foundation · Central Carolina Community Foundation · McKesson Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Workman Family Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Workman Family Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Workman Family Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to The Workman Family Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Workman Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph