Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Woodbury Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
60
Grants FY2025still arriving
18
States reached
$325k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$5.3MArts & Culture$1.7MHealth$1.5MReligion$875kAnimals$613kRecreation & Sports$588kFood & Nutrition$523kEnvironment$422kOther$0
02FY2025 · 60 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $68k
  • $10k–50k36 grants · $740k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $723k
  • $250k+1 grant · $325k
$15,000
Median grant
18
States reached
$38M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WARREN WILSON COLLEGE$325,000
WARREN WILSON COLLEGE$150,000
THETFORD ACADEMY$105,000
USC NORRIS COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CEN$97,500
HEADLANDS CENTER FOR THE ARTS$85,000
THE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION$80,000
DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN MISSIONARY SOC$55,000
ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$50,000
PROJECT TRANSFORMATION RIO TEXAS$50,000
CORAL RESTORATION FOUNDATION$50,000
DIGITAL STONE PROJECT$40,000
WILLING HANDS$40,000
CAMP THORPE$40,000
PLOWSHARE FARM$40,000
NE SCULPTURE GALLERY FACTORY$35,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $436k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%INTERCAMBIO DE COMUNIDADES: $14k → 12%INDIANA BLIND CHILDRENS FOUNDATION: $5k → 16%WILLING HANDS: $50k → 9%INTERCAMBIO DE COMUNIDADES: $8k → 12%WILLING HANDS: $40k → 9%INTERCAMBIO DE COMUNIDADES: $5k → 12%WILLING HANDS: $30k → 9%INTERCAMBIO DE COMUNIDADES: $5k → 12%WILLING HANDS: $30k → 9%INTERCAMBIO DE COMUNIDADES: $5k → 12%WILLING HANDS: $30k → 9%WILLING HANDS: $25k → 9%WILLING HANDS: $15k → 9%CHILDRENS RANCH FOUNDATION: $60k → 14%CHILDRENS RANCH FOUNDATION: $44k → 14%CHILDRENS RANCH FOUNDATION: $40k → 14%CHILDRENS RANCH FOUNDATION: $30k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NH
MT
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
IN
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
VA
MD
NM
NC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$12M · 81 repeat orgs$876k to everyone else

81 repeat relationships: 41 still active in FY2025, 40 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

81
33

Total granted

$12M
$646k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+40%

Still filing today

56%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $230k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureEnvironmentAnimalsHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WARREN WILSON COLLEGE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.3M · revenue +78%
  • TA
    THETFORD ACADEMY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $634k · revenue +26%
  • PF
    PLOWSHARE FARM INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $277k · revenue +93%

Funded once

  • DA
    DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN MISSIONARY SOCIETY OF THE PROTESTANT EPISCOPA
    one grant, 2023 · $95k
  • UF
    UT FOUNDATION HEALTH SCIENCE CNTR
    one grant, 2024 · $65k
  • TH
    THE H E ART PROJECT dba ARTWORXLA
    one grant, 2019 · $56k · revenue +6%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
California College of the Arts

California college of the arts educates students to shape culture and society through the practice and critical study of art, architecture, design, and writing. benefitting from its san francisco bay area location, the college prepares…

Education
3
Rhode Island School of Design

The mission of rhode island school of design, through its college and museum,is to educate its students and the public in the creation and (see schedule o)appreciation of works of art and design, to discover and transmit knowledge and to…

Education
4
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
5
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
6
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
7
Sarah Lawrence College

At sarah lawrence college, our mission is to graduate citizens of the world who are diverse in every definition of the word, who take intellectual and creative risks, and who are able to focus exceptional intellectual discipline (continued…

Education
8
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
9
Saint Anselm College

Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…

Education
10
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education
11
California Institute of the Arts

Calarts is a multidisciplinary community of artists. our ongoing educational endeavor is grounded in openness, experimentation, critical engagement, and creative freedom. through artistic practice, we transform ourselves, each other, and…

Arts & Culture
12
Barton College

Founded in 1902, barton college is a four-year, private, liberal arts college located in wilson, n.c. the barton experience focuses on academic excellence within a wide range of professional and liberal arts programs leading to…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Childrens Ranch Foundation; the most unlike its peers is San Antonio Mastersingers. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

73 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 73 of the 127 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
70/73
Grantees still filing
55/73
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

USC NORRIS CANCER CENTER: $551,500 · OtherUSC NORRIS CANCER CENTERWORK-SHOP: $532,500 · OtherWORK-SHOPIndividual grant recipient: $411,080 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPLOWSHARE FARM INC: $276,500 · OtherTHE RETREAT: $197,000 · OtherCHURCH OF OUR SAVIOR: $190,000 · Other+68 more: $3,034,500 · Other+68 moreWARREN WILSON COLLEGE: $3,258,278 · EducationWARREN WILSON COLLEGETHETFORD ACADEMY: $634,000 · EducationTHETFORD ACADEMYSONOMA ACADEMY: $185,000 · Education+16 more: $820,000 · Education+16 moreHEADLANDS CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $160,000 · Arts & CultureBOLINAS MUSEUM: $152,500 · Arts & CultureFRANCONIA SCULPTURE PARK LEGEROS: $125,000 · Arts & CultureSAN DIEGO MUSEUM OF ART: $125,000 · Arts & CultureNE SCULPTURE GALLERY FACTORY: $90,000 · Arts & CultureTHE H E ART PROJECT dba ARTWORXLA: $56,000 · Arts & CultureSAN FRANCISCO BALLET ASSOCIATION: $35,000 · Arts & CultureSAN ANTONIO MASTERSINGERS: $30,000 · Arts & Culture+7 more: $90,000 · Arts & CultureCALIFORNIA TROUT INC: $235,000 · AnimalsDogs For Diabetics - dba National Institute of Canine Service and Training: $95,000 · AnimalsBrother Wolf Animal Rescue Inc: $70,000 · AnimalsGood NewZ Pittie Pups Rescue: $40,000 · AnimalsSISTER KITTEN ANIMAL RESCUE IN: $27,500 · Animals+1 more: $12,500 · AnimalsCAMP THORPE INC: $275,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE ALOHA FOUNDATION INC: $199,000 · Recreation & SportsWILLING HANDS ENTERPRISES INC: $220,000 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDRENS RANCH FOUNDATION: $174,000 · Human ServicesINTERCAMBIO DE COMUNIDADES: $37,000 · Human Services+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC: $175,000 · EnvironmentBACKCOUNTRY HUNTERS & ANGLERS: $86,500 · EnvironmentTHE CORAL RESTORATION FOUNDATION INC: $80,000 · EnvironmentSUSTAINABLE RESOURCES INSTITUTE INC: $40,000 · EnvironmentTHE WILDERNESS SOCIETY: $30,000 · Environment+2 more: $10,000 · Environment
Other$5,193,080Education$4,897,278Arts & Culture$863,500Animals$480,000Recreation & Sports$474,000Human Services$436,000Environment$421,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWARREN WILSON COLLEGE: $3,258,278 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetTHETFORD ACADEMY: $634,000 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetPLOWSHARE FARM INC: $276,500 over 8y, 3.1% of budgetCAMP THORPE INC: $275,000 over 9y, 8.9% of budgetCALIFORNIA TROUT INC: $235,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetWILLING HANDS ENTERPRISES INC: $220,000 over 7y, 1.9% of budgetTHE ALOHA FOUNDATION INC: $199,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetSONOMA ACADEMY: $185,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC: $175,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CHILDRENS RANCH FOUNDATION: $174,000 over 4y, 22% of budgetHEADLANDS CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $160,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetBOLINAS MUSEUM: $152,500 over 4y, 8.5% of budgetMARIN PRIMARY & MIDDLE SCHOOL: $150,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetFRANCONIA SCULPTURE PARK LEGEROS: $125,000 over 2y, 7.4% of budgetSAN DIEGO MUSEUM OF ART: $125,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetBENNINGTON COLLEGE CORPORATION: $120,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWilliams College: $100,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $95,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCarnegie Mellon University: $95,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDogs For Diabetics - dba National Institute of Canine Service and Training: $95,000 over 4y, 6.3% of budgetNE SCULPTURE GALLERY FACTORY: $90,000 over 2y, 25% of budgetBACKCOUNTRY HUNTERS & ANGLERS: $86,500 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetTHE CORAL RESTORATION FOUNDATION INC: $80,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN HIPPOTHERAPY ASSOCIATION INC: $75,000 over 4y, 4.1% of budgetBrother Wolf Animal Rescue Inc: $70,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetNORTH BRIDGE ACADEMY: $65,000 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetRochester Institute of Technology: $65,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $63,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLoving Food Resources Inc: $62,500 over 4y, 5.0% of budgetRoss School Foundation: $60,000 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetTHE H E ART PROJECT dba ARTWORXLA: $56,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $55,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $52,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWestern North Carolina AIDS Project Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGood NewZ Pittie Pups Rescue: $40,000 over 2y, 99% of budgetSUSTAINABLE RESOURCES INSTITUTE INC: $40,000 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetINTERCAMBIO DE COMUNIDADES: $37,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO BALLET ASSOCIATION: $35,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMIGRANT JUSTICE INC: $35,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $33,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WILDERNESS SOCIETY: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAN ANTONIO MASTERSINGERS: $30,000 over 6y, 8.4% of budgetSISTER KITTEN ANIMAL RESCUE IN: $27,500 over 4y, 4.1% of budgetTHE BRANSON SCHOOL: $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHAMPDEN-SYDNEY COLLEGE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE MORRILL HOMESTEAD INC: $25,000 over 2y, 19% of budgetStapleton School of Performing Arts: $22,500 over 6y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WARREN WILSON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THETFORD ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds PLOWSHARE FARM INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP THORPE INC ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA TROUT INC ↗
  • Who funds WILLING HANDS ENTERPRISES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ALOHA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SONOMA ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds THE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDRENS RANCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HEADLANDS CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds BOLINAS MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds MARIN PRIMARY & MIDDLE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds FRANCONIA SCULPTURE PARK LEGEROS ↗
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds BENNINGTON COLLEGE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Williams College ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Carnegie Mellon University ↗
  • Who funds Dogs For Diabetics - dba National Institute of Canine Service and Training ↗
  • Who funds NE SCULPTURE GALLERY FACTORY ↗
  • Who funds BACKCOUNTRY HUNTERS & ANGLERS ↗
  • Who funds THE CORAL RESTORATION FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Marin Community FoundationCA23.4× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Marin Community Foundation · The Vermont Community Foundation · Ben & Jerry's Foundation Inc · Bny Mellon Charitable Gift Fund · The Windham Foundation Inc · Impactassetsinc · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · The San Francisco Foundation · The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina Inc · McBurney Foundation · Vermont Humanities Council · Vermont Council on the Arts Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Woodbury Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Woodbury Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 17%
  • Vermont Folklife Center: 90% of income from government
  • Upper Valley Haven: 38% of income from government
  • Northwest Connecticut Arts Council Inc: 35% of income from government
  • Northeast Slopes Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Retreat Farm Ltd: 25% of income from government
  • Willing Hands Enterprises Inc: 17% of income from government
  • The Coral Restoration Foundation Inc: 16% of income from government
  • Thetford Academy: 2% of income from government
  • Norwich Community Collaborative Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Migrant Justice Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Bennington College Corporation: 0% of income from government
  • Williams College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Woodbury Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Woodbury Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 127 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Woodbury’s filings →

More from the funding graph