Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Wood Foundation of Chambersburg

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$398k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$3.5MEducation$452kPhilanthropy$287kYouth Development$225kEnvironment$137kHealth$25kHuman Services$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $262k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$10,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FLORIDA STUDIO THEATRE$100,000
GIRLS INC OF ALAMEDA COUNTY$40,000
SAINT MARY'S COLLEGE OF CALIFORNIA$40,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SARASOTA COUNTY$40,000
NEW LITERARY PROJECT$30,000
CHAUTAUQUA INSTITUTION$30,000
AURORA THEATRE COMPANY$30,000
JOUNCE PARTNERS$20,000
FREIGHT AND SALVAGE COFFEEHOUSE$12,000
DELAWARE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
ART CENTER SARASOTA$7,000
COMPASSION AND CHOICES$5,000
OLD GROWTH FOREST NETWORK$5,000
THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION FOR SARASOTA COUNTY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $240k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%GIRLS INC OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $40k → 10%GIRLS INC OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $40k → 10%GIRLS INC OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $40k → 10%GIRLS INC OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $35k → 10%GIRLS INC OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $35k → 10%GIRLS INC OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $30k → 10%GIRLS INC OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $5k → 10%WOMEN'S DAY TIME DROP-IN CENTER: $2k → 10%WOMEN'S DAY TIME DROP-IN CENTER: $2k → 10%WOMEN'S DAY TIME DROP-IN CENTER: $2k → 10%WOMEN'S DAY TIME DROP-IN CENTER: $2k → 10%WOMEN'S DAY TIME DROP-IN CENTER: $2k → 10%WOMEN'S DAY TIME DROP-IN CENTER: $2k → 10%WOMEN'S DAY TIME DROP-IN CENTER: $2k → 10%WOMEN'S DAY TIME DROP-IN CENTER: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
OH
PA
CT
CA
CO
MD
DE
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.2M · 28 repeat orgs$93k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
5

Total granted

$4.2M
$43k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+19%

Still filing today

75%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GI
    GIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNTY
    7× · 2018–2024 · $225k · revenue +43%
  • FLORIDA STUDIO THEATRE INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $200k · revenue +48%
  • JP
    JOUNCE PARTNERS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $175k · revenue +173%

Funded once

  • CF
    CENTER FOR ENVIORNMENTAL LITERACY
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
  • SL
    SOAR LEARNING CENTER INC
    one grant, 2022 · $8k · revenue -63%
  • EO
    Eugene O'Neill Foundation Tao Housegraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $4k · revenue +52%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Institute of Contemporary Art
—
2
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…

Arts & Culture
3
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
4
California College of the Arts

California college of the arts educates students to shape culture and society through the practice and critical study of art, architecture, design, and writing. benefitting from its san francisco bay area location, the college prepares…

Education
5
Susan Smith Blackburn Prize Inc
—
6
The Pierpont Morgan Library

The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.

Education
7
Stages

Stages makes plays and tells stories that invite everyone to live more deeply and love more boldly.

Arts & Culture
8
Sarah Lawrence College

At sarah lawrence college, our mission is to graduate citizens of the world who are diverse in every definition of the word, who take intellectual and creative risks, and who are able to focus exceptional intellectual discipline (continued…

Education
9
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
10
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
11
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
12
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Conservatory Theatre Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Charles O Wood Iii & Miriam M Wood Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/28
Grantees still filing
22/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHARLES O WOOD III & MIRIAM M WOOD FOUNDATION: $2,600,000 · OtherCHARLES O WOOD III & MIRIAM M WOOD FOUNDATION+16 more: $426,003 · Other+16 moreFLORIDA STUDIO THEATRE INC: $200,000 · Arts & CultureFLORIDA STUDIO …NEW LITERARY PROJECT: $150,000 · Arts & CultureNEW LITERARY PR…ISABELLA STEWART GARDNER MUSEUM INC: $75,000 · Arts & CultureISABELLA STEWAR…The Aurora Theatre Company: $70,000 · Arts & CultureThe Aurora Thea…BERKELEY SOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION OF TRADITIONAL MUSIC: $48,000 · Arts & CultureBERKELEY SOCIET…CHAUTAUQUA INSTITUTION: $35,000 · Arts & CultureCHAUTAUQUA INST…ART CENTER SARASOTA INC: $31,034 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $18,500 · Arts & CultureLafayette Library and Learning Center Foundation: $150,000 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $90,000 · EducationSAINT MARY'S COLLEGE OF CALIFORNIA: $40,000 · EducationLIBRARY FOUNDATION FOR SARASOTA COUNTY INC: $22,000 · Education+1 more: $2,000 · EducationTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SARASOTA CO INC: $240,000 · PhilanthropyDELAWARE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $46,500 · Philanthropy+1 more: $3,500 · PhilanthropyGIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $225,000 · Human ServicesWOMENS DAYTIME DROP-IN CENTER: $14,500 · Human ServicesJOUNCE PARTNERS INC: $175,000 · Youth DevelopmentCreative Growth Art Center: $14,500 · Health
Other$3,026,003Arts & Culture$627,534Education$304,000Philanthropy$290,000Human Services$239,500Youth Development$175,000Health$14,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHARLES O WOOD III & MIRIAM M WOOD FOUNDATION: $2,600,000 over 6y, 81% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SARASOTA CO INC: $240,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $225,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetFLORIDA STUDIO THEATRE INC: $200,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetJOUNCE PARTNERS INC: $175,000 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetLafayette Library and Learning Center Foundation: $150,000 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetNEW LITERARY PROJECT: $150,000 over 4y, 14% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $90,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetISABELLA STEWART GARDNER MUSEUM INC: $75,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetThe Aurora Theatre Company: $70,000 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetBERKELEY SOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION OF TRADITIONAL MUSIC: $48,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetDELAWARE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $46,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT MARY'S COLLEGE OF CALIFORNIA: $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetURBANITE THEATRE INC: $35,000 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetCHAUTAUQUA INSTITUTION: $35,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetART CENTER SARASOTA INC: $31,034 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetLIBRARY FOUNDATION FOR SARASOTA COUNTY INC: $22,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetOAKLAND MUSEUM OF CALIFORNIA: $15,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCreative Growth Art Center: $14,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetWOMENS DAYTIME DROP-IN CENTER: $14,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetSan Francisco Community Clinic Consortium: $14,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetOLD-GROWTH FOREST NETWORK INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCOMPASSION & CHOICES: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEugene O'Neill Foundation Tao House: $3,500 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetAMERICAN CONSERVATORY THEATRE FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSALISBURY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEarth Island Institute Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHARLES O WOOD III & MIRIAM M WOOD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SARASOTA CO INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA STUDIO THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds JOUNCE PARTNERS INC ↗
  • Who funds Lafayette Library and Learning Center Foundation ↗
  • Who funds NEW LITERARY PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds ISABELLA STEWART GARDNER MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds The Aurora Theatre Company ↗
  • Who funds BERKELEY SOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION OF TRADITIONAL MUSIC ↗
  • Who funds DELAWARE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SAINT MARY'S COLLEGE OF CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds URBANITE THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHAUTAUQUA INSTITUTION ↗
  • Who funds ART CENTER SARASOTA INC ↗
  • Who funds LIBRARY FOUNDATION FOR SARASOTA COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds OAKLAND MUSEUM OF CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds Creative Growth Art Center ↗
  • Who funds WOMENS DAYTIME DROP-IN CENTER ↗
  • Who funds San Francisco Community Clinic Consortium ↗
  • Who funds OLD-GROWTH FOREST NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds COMPASSION & CHOICES ↗
  • Who funds SOAR LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Eugene O'Neill Foundation Tao House ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CONSERVATORY THEATRE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SALISBURY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Earth Island Institute Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

East Bay Community FoundationCA16.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: East Bay Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · Simpson Psb Fund · Gulf Coast Community Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Sarasota Co Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Wood Foundation of Chambersburg funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Wood Foundation of Chambersburg. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Delaware Community Foundation Inc: 13% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Salisbury University Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Florida Studio Theatre Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Wood Foundation of Chambersburg?

Find your warmest path to The Wood Foundation of Chambersburg through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Wood Foundation of Chambersburg’s filings →

More from the funding graph