Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Winkler Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$307kEducation$282kPhilanthropy$149kCivil Rights$32kPublic Safety & Disaster$32kCrime & Legal$28kHealth$8kYouth Development$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$147k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE$20,000
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 95% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%LA PHILHARMONIC: $310k → 14%HERITAGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $6k → 13%FORE HADLEY FOUNDATION: $4k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%LA PHILHARMONIC: $225k → 14%AMERICAN CONSTITUTION SOCIETY: $10k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%LA PHILHARMONIC: $99k → 14%AMERICAN CONSTITUTION SOCIETY: $10k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%AMERICAN CONSTITUTION SOCIETY: $10k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION: $8k → 11%MARGO & IRWIN WINKLER FOUNDATION: $100k → 14%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $4k → 17%AMERICAN CONSTITUTION SOCIETY: $2k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION: $8k → 11%MARGO & IRWIN WINKLER FOUNDATION: $30k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION: $8k → 11%THE PAINTED TURTLE: $3k → 14%FILM AT LINCOLN CENTER: $5k → 17%GEORGETOWN FUND: $10k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION: $8k → 11%MOTION PICTURE ACADEMY FOUNDATION: $150k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION: $8k → 11%MOTION PICTURE ACADEMY FOUNDATION: $150k → 14%MULTIPLYING GOOD: $6k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION: $8k → 11%UCLA FOUNDATION: $13k → 14%MULTIPLYING GOOD: $3k → 17%UCLA FOUNDATION: $13k → 14%NYU SCHOOL OF LAW: $7k → 17%NYU SCHOOL OF LAW: $7k → 17%LUPUS LOS ANGELES: $5k → 14%NYU SCHOOL OF LAW: $7k → 17%HARVARD VARSITY CLUB: $3k → 14%NYU SCHOOL OF LAW: $7k → 17%POSSE FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%NYU SCHOOL OF LAW: $7k → 17%NYU SCHOOL OF LAW: $7k → 17%BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE: $20k → 17%BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE: $20k → 17%BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE: $20k → 17%BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE: $20k → 17%BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE: $20k → 17%BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE: $20k → 17%BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE: $20k → 17%BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE: $20k → 17%BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE: $20k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 11 repeat orgs$53k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against +42% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
14

Total granted

$1.4M
$53k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+42%

Still filing today

55%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsMembership BenefitHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $180k · revenue +206%
  • UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $75k · revenue +72%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    4× · 2017–2022 · $32k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • TP
    THE POSSE FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +42%
  • GF
    GEORGETOWN FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • HP
    HERITAGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2024 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
2
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
3
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
4
Brooklyn Law School

To provide students with the knowledge, skills, ethical values needed for a career in law.

Education
5
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
6
Atlantic University Inc

Provide post-secondary education of excellence.

Education
7
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
8
New York University School of Law Foundation

The foundation, a subsidiary of new york university, fosters legal education and research at new york university's school of law by awarding scholarships, making grants for educational purposes related to law, and supporting programs of…

Education
9
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
10
Academy of Television Arts and Sciences

The Television Academy is dedicated to celebrating excellence, innovation and the advancement of the telecommunications arts and sciences through recognition, education and leadership, while fostering a diverse, inclusive and accessible…

—
11
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
12
United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee

Empowering the competitive excellence and well-being of team usa athletes, championing the power of sport, and inspiring the nation.

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Oliver Scholars Program Inc; the most unlike its peers is Fore Hadley Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $634,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMOTION PICTURE ACADEMY FOUNDATION: $300,000 · OtherMOTION PICTURE ACADEMY FOUNDATIONMARGO & IRWIN WINKLER FOUNDATION: $130,000 · OtherMARGO & IRWIN WINKLER FOUNDATIONNYU SCHOOL OF LAW: $42,000 · Other+9 more: $34,279 · OtherWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $180,000 · EducationWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER…UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND C…AMERICAN CONSTITUTION SOCIETY FOR LAW & POLICY: $32,125 · EducationAMERICAN CONSTITUTION SO…UCLA FOUNDATION: $26,000 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATION+1 more: $10,000 · EducationAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $32,000 · Human ServicesMULTIPLYING GOOD INC: $8,509 · PhilanthropyFORE HADLEY FOUNDATION: $3,900 · PhilanthropyFILM AT LINCOLN CENTER INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureBEAT THE STREETS WRESTLING INC: $3,102 · Recreation & SportsTHE LOS ANGELES DODGERS FOUNDATION: $500 · Recreation & SportsTHE PAINTED TURTLE: $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentHOUSE OF SPEAKEASY FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Membership Benefit
Other$1,140,279Education$323,125Human Services$32,000Philanthropy$12,409Arts & Culture$5,000Recreation & Sports$3,602Youth Development$2,500Membership Benefit$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $180,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CONSTITUTION SOCIETY FOR LAW & POLICY: $32,125 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $32,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $26,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE POSSE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMULTIPLYING GOOD INC: $8,509 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFILM AT LINCOLN CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFORE HADLEY FOUNDATION: $3,900 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetBEAT THE STREETS WRESTLING INC: $3,102 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PAINTED TURTLE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OLIVER SCHOLARS PROGRAM INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOUSE OF SPEAKEASY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE LOS ANGELES DODGERS FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CONSTITUTION SOCIETY FOR LAW & POLICY ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE POSSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MULTIPLYING GOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds FILM AT LINCOLN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FORE HADLEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BEAT THE STREETS WRESTLING INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PAINTED TURTLE ↗
  • Who funds THE OLIVER SCHOLARS PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE OF SPEAKEASY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE LOS ANGELES DODGERS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management IncNY13.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Winkler Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Winkler Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Winkler Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Winkler Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Winkler Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph