Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Wilson Family Private Foundation

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$26k
Granted FY2020
6
Grants FY2020
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Education$130kAnimals$55kReligion$43kArts & Culture$23kRecreation & Sports$9kHuman Services$8kHealth$5kYouth Development$2kOther$0
02FY2020 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k5 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$2,750
Median grant
2
States reached
$57k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BESSEMER CITY HIGH SCHOOL$15,400
ST MARGARET MARY ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH MEN'S CLUB$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,750
ROCK SPRINGS ELEMENTARY$2,000
ROCK SPRINGS ELEMENTARY PTO$500
HOLBROOK MIDDLE SCHOOL$300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $450) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BEDS FOR KIDS: $450 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$198k · 6 repeat orgs$82k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +170% since the first grant, against +101% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2020, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
17

Total granted

$198k
$72k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+170%
+101%

Still filing today

50%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
EnvironmentArts & CultureAnimalsHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RS
    ROCK SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTO INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $24k · revenue +183%
  • TW
    TED WILLIAMS MUSEUM AND HITTERS HALL OF FAME INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $21k · revenue +78%
  • NC
    North Carolina Wildlife Federation Inc
    2× · 2018–2019 · $11k · revenue +170%

Funded once

  • EB
    EMMANUEL BAPTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $14k
  • LC
    LAST CHANCE MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2019 · $11k
  • PP
    PIEDMONT PIRATES LITTLE LEAGUE
    one grant, 2018 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Carolina Wildlife Conservation Cent Er

Our mission is to rescue, rehabilitate and release injured, orphaned and ill local wildlife. we focus on wildlife conservation education so that people and animals can live in productive harmony.

Animals
2
American Wildlife Refuge Inc

The organization exists to rescue and rehab raptor birds in and around Raleigh, North Carolina and educate the public about them.

Animals
3
North American Wolf Foundation Inc

Protect the wolf in the wild through education and exposure.

Animals
4
Catawba Valley Wildlife Club Inc

The Catawba Valley Wildlife Club is a conservation organization where the primary goal is to conserve our natural resources. We offer educational programs to the general public in order to raise public safety. Facilities are open to NC…

Environment
5
Friends of the Great Dismal Swamp National Wildlife Refuge

The mission of the Friends of the GDSNWR Organization is to promote a better understanding and appreciation for the natural environment of the Great Dismal Swamp National Wildlife Refuge by enhancing public awareness and interest and by…

Environment
6
Wildlife & Outdoor Recreation Found

To conserve, protect, enhance, and support the fisheries, wildlife, and habitat resources of nc; increase and maintain access to the resources for all outdoorenthusiasts, sportspersons, conservationists, biologists, and scientificpartners,…

Environment
7
Collie Rescue of the Carolinas

Endangered animal rescue and adoption

Animals
8
Nc Dog Rescue Organization
—
9
Moore-Odom Wildlife Foundation Inc
Environment
10
Rob & Bessie Welder Wildlife Foundation
—
11
North Carolina Sports Legacy Foundation Fka Promote the Youth Foundation
Philanthropy
12
Loudoun Wildlife Conservancy

Loudoun Wildlife Conservancy inspires, motivates, and engages people to protect, preserve, and restore wildlife habitat in Loudoun County, Virginia.We accomplish our mission through our advocacy, education, citizen science, and habitat…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Carolina Wildlife Federation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ted Williams Museum and Hitters Hall of Fame Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GASTON COUNTY SCHOOLS: $102,900 · OtherGASTON COUNTY SCHOOLSROCK SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTO INC: $24,224 · OtherROCK SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTO INCEMMANUEL BAPTIST CHURCH: $14,200 · OtherEMMANUEL BAPTIST CHURCHLAST CHANCE MINISTRIES: $10,500 · OtherPIEDMONT PIRATES LITTLE LEAGUE: $8,000 · OtherCHAPEL GROVE CHURCH OF GOD: $7,350 · OtherBESSEMER CITY OPTIMIST CLUB: $7,189 · Other+13 more: $30,375 · Other+13 moreLake Norman Wildlife Conservationists: $38,000 · EnvironmentLake Norman Wildlif…North Carolina Wildlife Federation Inc: $11,000 · EnvironmentNorth Carolina Wild…TED WILLIAMS MUSEUM AND HITTERS HALL OF FAME INC: $20,853 · Arts & CultureTED WILLI…Mooresville Artist Guild: $2,500 · Arts & CultureMooresvil…Carolina Raptor Center Inc: $1,500 · AnimalsALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 · HealthBEDS FOR KIDS INC: $450 · Human Services
Other$204,738Environment$49,000Arts & Culture$23,353Animals$1,500Health$1,000Human Services$450

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLake Norman Wildlife Conservationists: $38,000 over 2y, 49% of budgetROCK SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTO INC: $24,224 over 4y, 22% of budgetTED WILLIAMS MUSEUM AND HITTERS HALL OF FAME INC: $20,853 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetNorth Carolina Wildlife Federation Inc: $11,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetMooresville Artist Guild: $2,500 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetCarolina Raptor Center Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEDS FOR KIDS INC: $450 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Lake Norman Wildlife Conservationists ↗
  • Who funds ROCK SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTO INC ↗
  • Who funds TED WILLIAMS MUSEUM AND HITTERS HALL OF FAME INC ↗
  • Who funds North Carolina Wildlife Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Mooresville Artist Guild ↗
  • Who funds Carolina Raptor Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BEDS FOR KIDS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Duke Energy FoundationNC13.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Duke Energy Foundation · Foundation for the Carolinas · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Wilson Family Private Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Wilson Family Private Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wilson Family Private’s filings →

    More from the funding graph