Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Wilson Family Private Foundation

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$26k
Granted FY2020
6
Grants FY2020
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172020.

Education$130kAnimals$55kReligion$43kArts & Culture$23kRecreation & Sports$9kHuman Services$8kHealth$5kYouth Development$2kOther$0
02FY2020 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k5 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$2,750
Median grant
2
States reached
$57k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BESSEMER CITY HIGH SCHOOL$15,400
ST MARGARET MARY ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH MEN'S CLUB$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,750
ROCK SPRINGS ELEMENTARY$2,000
ROCK SPRINGS ELEMENTARY PTO$500
HOLBROOK MIDDLE SCHOOL$300
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $450) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BEDS FOR KIDS: $450 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$198k · 6 repeat orgs$82k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +170% since the first grant, against +73% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2020, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
17

Total granted

$198k
$72k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+170%
+73%

Still filing today

50%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
EnvironmentArts & CultureAnimalsHealthHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RS
    ROCK SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTO INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $24k · revenue +183%
  • TW
    TED WILLIAMS MUSEUM AND HITTERS HALL OF FAME INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $21k · revenue +78%
  • NC
    North Carolina Wildlife Federation Inc
    2× · 2018–2019 · $11k · revenue +170%

Funded once

  • EB
    EMMANUEL BAPTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $14k
  • LC
    LAST CHANCE MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2019 · $11k
  • PP
    PIEDMONT PIRATES LITTLE LEAGUE
    one grant, 2018 · $8k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Carolina Wildlife Conservation Cent Er

Our mission is to rescue, rehabilitate and release injured, orphaned and ill local wildlife. we focus on wildlife conservation education so that people and animals can live in productive harmony.

Animals
2
American Wildlife Refuge Inc

The organization exists to rescue and rehab raptor birds in and around Raleigh, North Carolina and educate the public about them.

Animals
3
North American Wolf Foundation Inc

Protect the wolf in the wild through education and exposure.

Animals
4
Catawba Valley Wildlife Club Inc

The Catawba Valley Wildlife Club is a conservation organization where the primary goal is to conserve our natural resources. We offer educational programs to the general public in order to raise public safety. Facilities are open to NC…

Environment
5
Friends of the Great Dismal Swamp National Wildlife Refuge

The mission of the Friends of the GDSNWR Organization is to promote a better understanding and appreciation for the natural environment of the Great Dismal Swamp National Wildlife Refuge by enhancing public awareness and interest and by…

Environment
6
Wildlife & Outdoor Recreation Found

To conserve, protect, enhance, and support the fisheries, wildlife, and habitat resources of nc; increase and maintain access to the resources for all outdoorenthusiasts, sportspersons, conservationists, biologists, and scientificpartners,…

Environment
7
Collie Rescue of the Carolinas

Endangered animal rescue and adoption

Animals
8
Nc Dog Rescue Organization
9
Moore-Odom Wildlife Foundation Inc
Environment
10
Rob & Bessie Welder Wildlife Foundation
11
North Carolina Sports Legacy Foundation Fka Promote the Youth Foundation
Philanthropy
12
Loudoun Wildlife Conservancy

Loudoun Wildlife Conservancy inspires, motivates, and engages people to protect, preserve, and restore wildlife habitat in Loudoun County, Virginia.We accomplish our mission through our advocacy, education, citizen science, and habitat…

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Carolina Wildlife Federation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ted Williams Museum and Hitters Hall of Fame Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GASTON COUNTY SCHOOLS — $102,900 · OtherGASTON COUNTY SCHOOLSROCK SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTO INC — $24,224 · OtherROCK SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTO INCEMMANUEL BAPTIST CHURCH — $14,200 · OtherEMMANUEL BAPTIST CHURCHLAST CHANCE MINISTRIES — $10,500 · OtherPIEDMONT PIRATES LITTLE LEAGUE — $8,000 · OtherCHAPEL GROVE CHURCH OF GOD — $7,350 · OtherBESSEMER CITY OPTIMIST CLUB — $7,189 · Other+13 more — $30,375 · Other+13 moreLake Norman Wildlife Conservationists — $38,000 · EnvironmentLake Norman Wildlif…North Carolina Wildlife Federation Inc — $11,000 · EnvironmentNorth Carolina Wild…TED WILLIAMS MUSEUM AND HITTERS HALL OF FAME INC — $20,853 · Arts & CultureTED WILLI…Mooresville Artist Guild — $2,500 · Arts & CultureMooresvil…Carolina Raptor Center Inc — $1,500 · AnimalsALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $1,000 · HealthBEDS FOR KIDS INC — $450 · Human Services
Other$204,738Environment$49,000Arts & Culture$23,353Animals$1,500Health$1,000Human Services$450

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLake Norman Wildlife Conservationists — $38,000 over 2y, 49% of budgetROCK SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTO INC — $24,224 over 4y, 22% of budgetTED WILLIAMS MUSEUM AND HITTERS HALL OF FAME INC — $20,853 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetNorth Carolina Wildlife Federation Inc — $11,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetMooresville Artist Guild — $2,500 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetCarolina Raptor Center Inc — $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEDS FOR KIDS INC — $450 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Lake Norman Wildlife Conservationists
  • Who funds ROCK SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTO INC
  • Who funds TED WILLIAMS MUSEUM AND HITTERS HALL OF FAME INC
  • Who funds North Carolina Wildlife Federation Inc
  • Who funds Mooresville Artist Guild
  • Who funds Carolina Raptor Center Inc
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds BEDS FOR KIDS INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Duke Energy FoundationNC13.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Duke Energy Foundation · Foundation for the Carolinas · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Wilson Family Private Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph