Skip to content

· Private foundation

The William H & Margaret M Wallace Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$534k
Granted FY2024still arriving
30
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$703kEducation$699kFood & Nutrition$631kYouth Development$578kEnvironment$456kHuman Services$350kArts & Culture$260kAnimals$240kOther$0
02FY2024 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $50k
  • $10k–50k21 grants · $419k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $80k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MISSOULA FOOD BANK$80,000
POWELL COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION$35,000
CHILDRENS ONCOLOGY CAMP FOUNDATION$30,000
MONTANA NATURAL HISTORY CENTER$30,000
YWCA$30,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS OF MONTANA$25,000
RAPTORS OF THE ROCKIES$25,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$25,000
WATSONS CHILDRENS FOUNDATION$25,000
ST PATRICK HOUSE$25,000
MISSOULA CHILDRENS THEATER$20,000
MISSOULA YOUTH HOMES$20,000
GRANITE COUNTY CENTER FOUNDATION$15,000
ECOLOGY PROJECT INTERNATIONAL$15,000
BOYS GIRLS CLUB$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $190k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $40k → 9%CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $30k → 9%CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $30k → 9%CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $30k → 9%CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $30k → 9%CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $30k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.5M · 35 repeat orgs$52k to everyone else

35 repeat relationships: 30 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
5

Total granted

$4.5M
$52k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+163%

Still filing today

54%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentRecreation & SportsHealthFood & NutritionHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MF
    MISSOULA FOOD BANK & COMMUNITY CENTER
    8× · 2017–2024 · $505k · revenue +38%
  • MN
    MONTANA NATURAL HISTORY CENTER
    8× · 2017–2024 · $240k · revenue +35%
  • RO
    RAPTORS OF THE ROCKIES
    8× · 2017–2024 · $200k · revenue +4% · 34% of their budget

Funded once

  • WM
    WESTERN MONTANA MENTAL HEALTH CENTER
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue -37%
  • HE
    HELLGATE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
  • MA
    MISSOULA ART MUSEUMgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +163%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Scenic Montana Trails
—
2
Missoula Community Foundation

To enhance community vitality by inspiring community giving and strengthening nonprofits

Community Improvement
3
Montana Pediatric Cancer Foundation
Philanthropy
4
Montana Healthcare Foundation
Philanthropy
5
Montana Conservation Corps Inc

Montana Conservation Corps (MCC) inspires young people through hands-on conservation service to be leaders, stewards of the land and engaged citizens who improve their communities.

Civil Rights
6
Montana Wilderness School

The mission of the montana wilderness school is to provide empowering expeditionary wilderness courses to youth that foster personal growth and cultivate a conservation ethic through connecting with remote landscapes and wild places.

Environment
7
Montanas Outdoor Legacy Foundation

To collectively serve as a catalyst for engagement and bonding of people to our wildlife and public lands in montana through a sense of place, education, access, research and stewardship.

Environment
8
Missoula Mountain Bike Coalition

Missoula mountain bike coalition's mission is to promote and create mountain biking opportunities in missoula and surrounding areas through trail building, stewardship, advocacy and outreach.

Recreation & Sports
9
Montana Raptor Conservation Center Inc

Our mission is to improve the welfare of raptors across montana through rehabilitation of injured birds, community education, and partnerships for raptor conservation and research.

Environment
10
Montana Conservation Elders
Environment
11
Montana Hospital Association

Montana hospital association is the principal advocate for the interests of members in their efforts to improve the health status of the communities they serve.

—
12
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Western Montana

Keeping families with a sick child/children close to the care and resources they need, when it matters the most.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Montana Natural History Center; the most unlike its peers is The Roxy Theater. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
15/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

POWELL COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $281,000 · OtherPOWELL COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATIONYWCA: $280,000 · OtherYWCAST PATRICK HOUSE: $200,000 · OtherST PATRICK HOUSEWATSONS CHILDRENS FOUNDATION: $200,000 · OtherWATSONS CHILDRENS FOUNDATIONMCT INC: $160,000 · OtherMCT INCYELLOWSTONE BOYS GIRLS RANCH: $98,255 · OtherDRUMMOND HIGH SCHOOL: $96,500 · OtherBOYS GIRLS CLUB: $85,000 · OtherWRITING COACHES OF MISSOULA: $80,000 · OtherFLAGSHIP PROGRAM: $75,000 · OtherGRANITE COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL: $71,000 · OtherGRANITE COUNTY CENTER FOUNDATION: $120,000 · OtherGRANITE COUNTY CENTER FOUNDATION+13 more: $371,199 · Other+13 moreMONTANA NATURAL HISTORY CENTER: $240,000 · EnvironmentMONTANA NATURA…FIVE VALLEYS LAND TRUST: $120,000 · EnvironmentFIVE VALLEYS L…CLARK FORK COALITION: $120,000 · EnvironmentCLARK FORK COA…ECOLOGY PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $95,999 · EnvironmentECOLOGY PROJEC…MISSOULA FOOD BANK & COMMUNITY CENTER: $505,000 · Food & NutritionMISSOULA FOOD…GARDEN CITY HARVEST INC: $35,000 · Food & NutritionGARDEN CITY H…CHILDRENS ONCOLOGY CAMP FOUNDATION: $240,000 · Recreation & SportsCHILDRENS ON…SPECIAL OLYMPICS MONTANA INC: $200,000 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL OLYM…A CAROUSEL FOR MISSOULA FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 · Recreation & SportsA CAROUSEL F…CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $190,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH HOMES: $160,000 · Human ServicesRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF EASTERN MONTANA: $200,000 · HealthPARTNERS HOPE FOUNDATION: $40,000 · Health+1 more: $8,000 · HealthRAPTORS OF THE ROCKIES: $200,000 · Animals
Other$2,117,954Environment$575,999Food & Nutrition$540,000Recreation & Sports$480,000Human Services$350,000Health$248,000Animals$200,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMISSOULA FOOD BANK & COMMUNITY CENTER: $505,000 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetMONTANA NATURAL HISTORY CENTER: $240,000 over 8y, 5.0% of budgetCHILDRENS ONCOLOGY CAMP FOUNDATION: $240,000 over 8y, 2.6% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MONTANA INC: $200,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetRAPTORS OF THE ROCKIES: $200,000 over 8y, 34% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF EASTERN MONTANA: $200,000 over 8y, 4.8% of budgetCHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $190,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetMCT INC: $160,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetYOUTH HOMES: $160,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetGRANITE COUNTY CENTER FOUNDATION: $120,000 over 8y, 61% of budgetFIVE VALLEYS LAND TRUST: $120,000 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetCLARK FORK COALITION: $120,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetECOLOGY PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $95,999 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetPARTNERS HOPE FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetA CAROUSEL FOR MISSOULA FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 over 8y, 2.4% of budgetGARDEN CITY HARVEST INC: $35,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetMISSOULA WRITING COLLABORATIVE: $30,000 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetWESTERN MONTANA MENTAL HEALTH CENTER: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ROXY THEATER: $15,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetMISSOULA ART MUSEUM: $15,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetGRANITE COUNTY MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 2y, 5.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MISSOULA FOOD BANK & COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MONTANA NATURAL HISTORY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CHILDRENS ONCOLOGY CAMP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS MONTANA INC ↗
  • Who funds RAPTORS OF THE ROCKIES ↗
  • Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF EASTERN MONTANA ↗
  • Who funds CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MCT INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH HOMES ↗
  • Who funds GRANITE COUNTY CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FIVE VALLEYS LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds CLARK FORK COALITION ↗
  • Who funds ECOLOGY PROJECT INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS HOPE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds A CAROUSEL FOR MISSOULA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GARDEN CITY HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSOULA WRITING COLLABORATIVE ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN MONTANA MENTAL HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE ROXY THEATER ↗
  • Who funds MISSOULA ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds GRANITE COUNTY MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dennis & Phyllis Washington FoundationMT35.8× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dennis & Phyllis Washington Foundation · The Llewellyn Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Max and Betty Swanson Foundation · Montana Community Foundation Inc · Pleiades Foundation · James G and Marcia H Valeo Charitable Fd · Jane S Heman Foundation Inc · Merlin Foundation Inc · The Bill & Rosemary Gallagher Foundation · Sample Foundation Inc · Treacy Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The William H & Margaret M Wallace Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The William H & Margaret M Wallace Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The William H & Margaret M Wallace Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The William H & Margaret M Wallace Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on William H & Margaret M Wallace’s filings →

    More from the funding graph