Skip to content

· Private foundation

The William B ORourke Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$106k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$438kHuman Services$130kArts & Culture$121kEducation$80kRecreation & Sports$5k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $101k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Colorado Coalition for the Homeless$30,000
Ensight Skills Center Inc$20,000
Aftersight fka AiNC$15,000
Emergency Family Assistance Associa$15,000
Mountain States Congress of Optomet$11,000
See the Future Fund$10,000
Innervision$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $145k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Emergency Family Assistance Associa: $15k → 12%SENIORS RESOURCE CTR INC: $10k → 12%EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOC: $20k → 12%EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOC: $20k → 12%Emergency Family Assistance Associa: $20k → 12%Emergency Family Assistance Associa: $20k → 12%Emergency Family Assistance Associa: $15k → 12%Emergency Family Assistance Associa: $15k → 12%Emergency Family Assistance Associa: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 19% of The William B ORourke Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in CO; by stated purpose, 83%.

The William B ORourke Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$804k · 9 repeat orgs$77k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +81% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
6

Total granted

$804k
$57k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+81%
+17%

Still filing today

67%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ES
    ENSIGHT SKILLS CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $155k · revenue +56%
  • EF
    EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $135k · revenue +112%
  • AI
    AUDIO INFORMATION NETWORK OF COLORA
    8× · 2017–2024 · $121k · revenue +81%

Funded once

  • MS
    MOUNTAIN STATES CONGRESS OF OPTMETR
    one grant, 2019 · $12k
  • CO
    COLORADO OPTOMERTRIC ASSOCIATION IN
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • SR
    SENIORS' RESOURCE CENTER INC
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue -56%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Council of the Blind of Colorado Inc

A3 is a 501 (c)(3) dedicated to personalized education, training, and support for individuals significantly impacted by vision loss to help them adapt, adjust, and achieve maximum independence.

—
2
Foresight Ski Guides Inc

Foresight promotes safety fun and independence for people who are blind or have low vision through accessible outdoor adaptive experiences.

Human Services
3
Delta Gamma Anchor Center for Blind Children

Part i and part iii, line 1: anchor center for blind children is a nationally recognized leader in teaching children with vision, cortical visual, dual sensory (vision and hearing), and co-occurring disabilities during their most formative…

—
4
Alaska Center for the Blind and Visually Impaired

The Alaska Center for the Blind and Visually Impaired's mission is to eliminate vision loss as the barrier to employment, community participation or quality of life. We are the only statewide training and resource center for vision…

—
5
National Federation of the Blind of Colorado

Self-help training and support to blind people.

Health
6
St Louis Society for the Blind

The society enhances independence, empowers individuals and enriches the lives of people who are visually impaired or blind.

Health
7
Bosma Industries for the Blind Inc

Bosma enterprises, creating opportunities for individuals who are blind or visually impaired.

Employment
8
Toledo Society for the Blind Inc

The sight center provides a unique blend of specialized vision rehabilitation programs and services that can help people of all ages work, learn, play and live independently with permanent vision loss. primary services include low vision…

Health
9
Lighthouse of Collier Inc

The mission of lighthouse of collier, inc. is to foster independence and enhance the quality of life for the blind, visually impaired and their caregivers.

Human Services
10
Vision Team
Employment
11
Center of Vision Enhancement

The center of vision enhancement primary mission is to provide services, support, health resource access, training, referrals, education and community outreach for the benefit of persons with any level of visual impairment so as to…

Human Services
12
Visionsservices for the Blind and Visually Impaired

Visions is a 98-year-old nonprofit vision rehabilitation and social service organization that trains low income people of all ages experiencing blindness and severe vision loss to lead independent and active lives at work, in their homes…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ensight Skills Center; the most unlike its peers is Colorado Lions Kidsight Program Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COLORADO COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS: $155,000 · OtherCOLORADO COALITION FOR THE HOMELESSSee the Future Fund: $90,000 · OtherSee the Future FundAftersight fka AiNC: $15,000 · OtherMOUNTAIN STATES CONGRESS OF OPTMETR: $11,800 · Other+5 more: $37,000 · Other+5 moreENSIGHT SKILLS CENTER: $155,000 · HealthENSIGHT SKILLS CENTERMOUNTAIN STATE CONGRESS OF OPTOMETRY: $53,000 · HealthMOUNTAIN STATE CONGRESS OF OPTOMETRYCOLORADO LIONS KIDSIGHT PROGRAM INC: $50,000 · HealthCOLORADO LIONS KIDSIGHT PROGRAM INCCOLORADO CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $37,500 · HealthCOLORADO CENTER FOR THE BLIND+1 more: $10,000 · HealthEMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION: $135,000 · Human ServicesEMERGENCY FAMILY A…SENIORS' RESOURCE CENTER INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesSENIORS' RESOURCE …AUDIO INFORMATION NETWORK OF COLORA: $121,000 · Arts & CultureAUDIO INFORMATI…
Other$308,800Health$305,500Human Services$145,000Arts & Culture$121,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetENSIGHT SKILLS CENTER: $155,000 over 9y, 5.1% of budgetEMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION: $135,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetAUDIO INFORMATION NETWORK OF COLORA: $121,000 over 8y, 2.7% of budgetMOUNTAIN STATE CONGRESS OF OPTOMETRY: $53,000 over 4y, 18% of budgetCOLORADO LIONS KIDSIGHT PROGRAM INC: $50,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetCOLORADO CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $37,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetSENIORS' RESOURCE CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetA SHARED VISION PARTNERS IN PEDIATRIC BLINDNESS AND VISUAL IMP: $10,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetUNITED STATES ASSOCIATION OF BLIND ATHLETES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ENSIGHT SKILLS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds AUDIO INFORMATION NETWORK OF COLORA ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTAIN STATE CONGRESS OF OPTOMETRY ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO LIONS KIDSIGHT PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO CENTER FOR THE BLIND ↗
  • Who funds SENIORS' RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds A SHARED VISION PARTNERS IN PEDIATRIC BLINDNESS AND VISUAL IMP ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES ASSOCIATION OF BLIND ATHLETES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Denver FoundationCO17.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Denver Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · Schlessman Foundation Inc · Pikes Peak Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The William B ORourke Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The William B ORourke Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on William B ORourke’s filings →

    More from the funding graph