How much does The William and Sandra Snyder Foundation give?

The William and Sandra Snyder Foundation reported 16 grants totaling $829,600 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 11 and 18 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.

What does The William and Sandra Snyder Foundation fund?

By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Education (47%), Arts & Culture (22%), Religion (12%).

Who are The William and Sandra Snyder Foundation's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Saint John's University ($1.8M), Artis-Naples Inc ($731k), The League Club Inc ($198k).

Does The William and Sandra Snyder Foundation fund new organizations?

In FY2024, 11% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Does The William and Sandra Snyder Foundation accept unsolicited applications?

Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

Which funders back the same organizations as The William and Sandra Snyder Foundation?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Collier Community Foundation Inc, William T Kemper Foundation Commerce Bank Trustee, World Wide Technology Foundation.

Where is The William and Sandra Snyder Foundation based?

The William and Sandra Snyder Foundation is based in FL.

The William and Sandra Snyder Foundation

The William and Sandra Snyder Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The William and Sandra Snyder Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$830k

Granted FY2025still arriving

Grants FY2025still arriving

States reached

$498k

Largest

01What it funds

0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.9MArts & Culture$906kReligion$480kYouth Development$326kCommunity Improvement$198kEnvironment$104kHealth$48kHuman Services$36kOther$0

02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k8 grants · $18k
$10k–50k5 grants · $98k
$50k–250k2 grants · $216k
$250k+1 grant · $498k

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

$3.5M

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
SAINT JOHN'S UNIVERSITY	$498,000
ARTIS NAPLES	$155,000
NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN	$60,500
THE LEAGUE CLUB	$40,000
METHODIST CHURCH OF THE RESURRECTION	$26,000
CHURCHILL CENTER & SCHOOL	$12,000
CIRCLE OF FRIENDS	$10,000
THE GOLF FOUNDATION	$10,000
NELSON ATIKINS MUSEUM	$5,000
THE KAUFFMAN CENTER	$5,000
JCYM	$3,100
SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN AND CHILDREN	$2,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION	$1,000
ALLIANCE FOR PERIOD SUPPLIES OF SWFL	$1,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION	$500

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$3.9M · 26 repeat orgs$104k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +69% since the first grant, against +61% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$3.9M

$83k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+69%

+61%

Still filing today

69%

50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesArts & CultureHealthEducationEnvironmentAnimalsOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

SJ
SAINT JOHN'S UNIVERSITY
8× · 2018–2025 · $1.8M · revenue +39%
AI
ARTIS-NAPLES INC
9× · 2017–2025 · $731k · revenue +27%
TL
The League Club Inc
7× · 2019–2025 · $198k · revenue +57%

Funded once

TS
THE SAINT LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATIONgraduated
one grant, 2018 · $30k · revenue +146%
YH
YOUTH HAVEN INCgraduated
one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue +126%
TS
THE SHELTER INCgraduated
one grant, 2019 · $6k · revenue +292%

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

The San Francisco Particular Council of the Society of St Vincent De Paul

The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.

Human Services

Wayside House Inc

Our mission is to break the cycle of addiction and trauma for women, children, and families.

—

Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc

Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us

Human Services

Entryway

Entryway is a national 501(c)3 organization that transitions individuals and families at risk of or experiencing homelessness to economic self-sufficiency by providing career training, full-time employment and housing opportunities in…

Unclassified

Lighthouse for the Homeless

The only free day shelter in the area comprised of a collection of community agencies and service providers, all focused on a single mission: ending homelessness in tarrant county.

Human Services

Pathways to Housing - Pa

Pathways to housing pa empowers people with disabilities to improve their housing stability, achieve better health, and reclaim their lives.

Housing & Shelter

Opportunity Partners

Mission: together we advance the quality of life for people with disabilities. vision: people of all abilities thrive in the world. values: impact- generate solutions that make a difference. choice - create opportunities for people to lead…

Employment

Women Against Abuse Inc

The mission of women against abuse is to provide quality, compassionate, and nonjudgmental services in a manner that fosters self-respect and independence in persons experiencing intimate partner violence and to lead the struggle to end…

Human Services

Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—

Interval House

The mission of the organization is to ensure safety and stability for people who are battered, abused, homeless or at risk; to create public awareness about the epidemic of violence; and to mobilize the community to prevent violence and…

Human Services

Family Promise of Greater Cleveland

To provide families facing the crisis of homelessness with a safe place designed to engage, inspire, and guide them toward a future where they feel empowered to control the course of their lives. family promise of greater cleveland…

—

Covenant House New Orleans

Covenant house new orleans (the organization) is a not-for-profit organization affiliated with 34 similar organizations across five countries, all of which are affiliates of covenant house international (parent affiliate) and share a…

Human Services

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Shelter for Abused Women & Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is Front Royal Pregnancy Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

34/34

Grantees still filing

27/34

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Other$3,046,250Arts & Culture$795,500Environment$109,350Human Services$36,700Animals$30,000Health$23,800Housing & Shelter$4,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Collier Community Foundation IncFL15.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Collier Community Foundation Inc · William T Kemper Foundation Commerce Bank Trustee · World Wide Technology Foundation · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · Edward Jones Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The William and Sandra Snyder Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The William and Sandra Snyder Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

5get no government money at all

8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

Play a game based on William and Sandra Snyder’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home