· Private foundation
The William and Sandra Snyder Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k8 grants · $18k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $98k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $216k
- $250k+1 grant · $498k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SAINT JOHN'S UNIVERSITY | $498,000 |
| ARTIS NAPLES | $155,000 |
| NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN | $60,500 |
| THE LEAGUE CLUB | $40,000 |
| METHODIST CHURCH OF THE RESURRECTION | $26,000 |
| CHURCHILL CENTER & SCHOOL | $12,000 |
| CIRCLE OF FRIENDS | $10,000 |
| THE GOLF FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| NELSON ATIKINS MUSEUM | $5,000 |
| THE KAUFFMAN CENTER | $5,000 |
| JCYM | $3,100 |
| SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN AND CHILDREN | $2,000 |
| ALLIANCE FOR PERIOD SUPPLIES OF SWFL | $1,000 |
| ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION | $1,000 |
| TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +69% since the first grant, against +61% for the ones you funded once.
26 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SJSAINT JOHN'S UNIVERSITY8× · 2018–2025 · $1.8M · revenue +39%
- AIARTIS-NAPLES INC9× · 2017–2025 · $731k · revenue +27%
- TLThe League Club Inc7× · 2019–2025 · $198k · revenue +57%
Funded once
- TSTHE SAINT LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATIONgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $30k · revenue +146%
- YHYOUTH HAVEN INCgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue +126%
- TSTHE SHELTER INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $6k · revenue +292%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.
Our mission is to break the cycle of addiction and trauma for women, children, and families.
Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us
Entryway is a national 501(c)3 organization that transitions individuals and families at risk of or experiencing homelessness to economic self-sufficiency by providing career training, full-time employment and housing opportunities in…
The only free day shelter in the area comprised of a collection of community agencies and service providers, all focused on a single mission: ending homelessness in tarrant county.
Pathways to housing pa empowers people with disabilities to improve their housing stability, achieve better health, and reclaim their lives.
Mission: together we advance the quality of life for people with disabilities. vision: people of all abilities thrive in the world. values: impact- generate solutions that make a difference. choice - create opportunities for people to lead…
The mission of women against abuse is to provide quality, compassionate, and nonjudgmental services in a manner that fosters self-respect and independence in persons experiencing intimate partner violence and to lead the struggle to end…
Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…
The mission of the organization is to ensure safety and stability for people who are battered, abused, homeless or at risk; to create public awareness about the epidemic of violence; and to mobilize the community to prevent violence and…
To provide families facing the crisis of homelessness with a safe place designed to engage, inspire, and guide them toward a future where they feel empowered to control the course of their lives. family promise of greater cleveland…
Covenant house new orleans (the organization) is a not-for-profit organization affiliated with 34 similar organizations across five countries, all of which are affiliates of covenant house international (parent affiliate) and share a…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Shelter for Abused Women & Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is Front Royal Pregnancy Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SAINT JOHN'S UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds ARTIS-NAPLES INC ↗
- Who funds The League Club Inc ↗
- Who funds NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
- Who funds THE REPERTORY THEATRE OF ST LOUIS ↗
- Who funds THE SAINT LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR BARNES-JEWISH HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds YOUTH HAVEN INC ↗
- Who funds THE NELSON GALLERY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE SHELTER ↗
- Who funds Forest Park Forever Inc ↗
- Who funds KAUFFMAN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
- Who funds ST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds AVENUE OF LIFE INC ↗
- Who funds LYRIC OPERA OF KANSAS CITY INC ↗
- Who funds Alliance for Period Supplies of SWFL Inc ↗
- Who funds THE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GATEWAY ARCH PARK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VAGABOND SCHOOL OF THE DRAMA INC ↗
- Who funds Front Royal Pregnancy Center Inc ↗
- Who funds PROVIDENCE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds PISGAH LEGAL SERVICES ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PEDAL THE CAUSE ↗
- Who funds GREAT CIRCLE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Collier Community Foundation Inc · William T Kemper Foundation Commerce Bank Trustee · World Wide Technology Foundation · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · Edward Jones Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The William and Sandra Snyder Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Naples Botanical Garden Inc — 3% of income from government
- The Shelter for Abused Women & Children Inc — 2% of income from government
- Youth Haven Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.