· Private foundation
The William and Karin Banks Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k36 grants · $147k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $234k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LOUDOUN CLUB 12 | $30,000 |
| HIGHLAND MEDICAL CENTER | $24,500 |
| DC RAPE CRISIS CENTER | $22,500 |
| SAFE HARBOR | $22,500 |
| BLOOD STAINED MEN | $15,000 |
| ALEXANDRIA SEAPORT FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| BOLAR VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY | $15,000 |
| HIGHLAND CENTER | $15,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $15,000 |
| VIRGINIA HORSE CENTER FOUNDATION CO JENNIFER DONOVAN | $14,500 |
| MARYLAND INSTITUTE COLLEGE OF ART | $13,550 |
| EQUINE RESCUE LEAGUE | $11,000 |
| SHANTI BHAVAN CHILDREN'S PROJECT | $10,000 |
| RED HORSE CENTER FOR COLLABORATIVE LEADERSHIP | $10,000 |
| WATERORG | $9,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $249k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 65% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
58 repeat relationships — 46 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HMHIGHLAND MEDICAL CENTER INC6× · 2020–2025 · $131k · revenue +27%
- LCLoudoun Club 123× · 2020–2025 · $106k · revenue +195% · 57% of their budget
- VHVIRGINIA HORSE CENTER FOUNDATION6× · 2020–2025 · $84k · revenue +46%
Funded once
- TFTLI FOUNDATIONone grant, 2024 · $40k
- ICINFORMED CONSENT ACTION NETWORKone grant, 2022 · $23k · revenue +14%
- AASKCA125one grant, 2022 · $12k · revenue -69%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Calverthealth medical center provides quality inpatient and ambulatory health care to the people of southern maryland that is accessible, cost-effective and compassionate. chmc works in partnership with the community to improve the health…
Shelter House's mission is to prevent and end homelessness and domestic violence by engaging the community, building effective relationships and providing crisis intervention, safe housing and supportive services.
Cvmc works collaboratively to meet the needs and improve the health of the residents of central vermont.
The organization's mission is to sustain a vibrant, healthy and strong community through affordable, culturally competent, quality primary health care.
Our mission is to improve the health of the communities we serve through our commitment to a common purpose of better patient care, better community health, and lower cost.
Facilitating statewide collaboration among Virginia's food banks, partners, and neighbors to improve nutrition security and empower strong, healthy communities.
Cultivate local food systems prioritizing health, equity, and sustainability, from farm forward.
To promote wellness for people with personal challenges who can benefit from equine-assisted activities and therapies in a safe and supportive environment.
To provide dignified access to free groceries for qualified families in Arlington, VA and surrounding counties.
To improve the health of the people in the communities we serve by integrating patient care, education, and research in a caring environment.
To provide excellence in the delivery of healthcare.
Community health center of snohomish county (chc) provides our diverse communities with access to high quality, affordable primary health care.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Champlain Valley Office of Economic Opportunity Inc and the most unlike its peers is T Colin Campbell Center for Nutrition Studies. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
54 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 54 of the 79 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HIGHLAND MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Loudoun Club 12 ↗
- Who funds VIRGINIA HORSE CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Highland Center ↗
- Who funds Maryland Institute ↗
- Who funds Alexandria Seaport Foundation ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE ↗
- Who funds SAFE HARBOR ↗
- Who funds DC RAPE CRISIS CENTER ↗
- Who funds EQUINE RESCUE LEAGUE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WATERORG ↗
- Who funds GERDAS EQUINE RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF CHITTENDEN COUNTY ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds COMMITTEE ON TEMPORARY SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds SAIL BEYOND CANCER VT INC ↗
- Who funds Highland County Volunteer Fire Department ↗
- Who funds Highland County Volunteer Rescue Squad Inc ↗
- Who funds THE LIGHT HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds UNITED COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SHANTI BHAVAN CHILDREN'S PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds INTERFAITH SOCIAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
- Who funds OUTRIGHT VERMONT ↗
- Who funds INFORMED CONSENT ACTION NETWORK ↗
- Who funds PRINCE GEORGE'S COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds CAMP FIRE USA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Harrisonburg & Rockingham County · Seventh Generation Foundation Inc · United Way of the National Capital Area · Nora Roberts Foundation · The Morris & Bessie Altman Foundation · Philip L Graham Fund co Graham Holdings Company · Ben & Jerry's Foundation Inc · Greater Washington Community Foundation · The Vermont Community Foundation · The Jerry Greenfield & Elizabeth Skarie Foundation · The University of Vermont Medical Center · United Way of Northwest Vermont Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The William and Karin Banks Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Committee On Temporary Shelter Inc — 52% of income from government
- Community Advocates for Family and Youth — 23% of income from government
- Champlain Valley Office of Economic Opportunity Inc — 23% of income from government
- Community Health Centers of Burlington Inc — 17% of income from government
- United Communities Against Poverty Inc — 17% of income from government
- Outright Vermont — 13% of income from government
- Burlington City Arts Foundation Inc — 6% of income from government
- Community Crisis Services Inc — 4% of income from government
- Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- Annapolis Maritime Museum Inc — 2% of income from government
- Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The William and Karin Banks Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The William and Karin Banks Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.