Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Wilford Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$70k
Granted FY2024still arriving
33
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$169kHuman Services$149kReligion$42kEducation$32kHousing & Shelter$25kYouth Development$24kFood & Nutrition$9kPhilanthropy$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k32 grants · $50k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$1,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$813k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$20,000
FIRST LOVE INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES$5,000
NEW LIFE FAMILY SERVICES$5,000
NEW LIFE ACADEMY EDUCATION$3,500
C247 FATHER'S ARMS MINISTRIES$3,000
YOUNG LIFE$2,500
LINC MINISTRIES INT'L$2,000
CORBELLA CLINIC$2,000
ESTHER HOMES$2,000
HOPE ACADEMY$2,000
TRINITY FIRST LUTHERAN SCHOOL$2,000
LIFESPRING MINISTRIES$2,000
REFUGE FOR WOMEN - CHICAGO$2,000
SOLID GROUND$1,750
HOPE INTERNATIONAL$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $56k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CORRIE'S HOUSE: $1k → 11%SOLID GROUND: $2k → 14%BEAUTIFUL U MINISTRIES: $1k → 8%C247 FATHER'S ARMS MINISTRIES: $4k → 14%C247 FATHER'S ARMS MINISTRIES: $4k → 14%SOLID GROUND: $2k → 14%SOLID GROUND: $2k → 14%SOLID GROUND: $2k → 14%VALLEY OUTREACH: $1k → 6%VALLEY OUTREACH: $1k → 6%SOLID GROUND: $2k → 14%VALLEY OUTREACH: $1k → 6%VALLEY OUTREACH: $1k → 6%SOLID GROUND: $2k → 14%C247 FATHER'S ARMS MINISTRIES: $4k → 14%VALLEY OUTREACH: $1k → 6%C247 FATHER'S ARMS MINISTRIES: $4k → 14%VALLEY OUTREACH: $500 → 6%SOLID GROUND: $2k → 14%C247 FATHER'S ARMS MINISTRIES: $3k → 14%VALLEY OUTREACH: $500 → 6%C247 FATHER'S ARMS MINISTRIES: $3k → 14%VALLEY OUTREACH: $500 → 6%SOLID GROUND: $2k → 14%C247 FATHER'S ARMS MINISTRIES: $3k → 14%C247 FATHER'S ARMS MINISTRIES: $3k → 14%WILDER FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%WILDER FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%WILDER FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%WILDER FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%WILDER FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
MA
PA
CO
MO
MD
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$464k · 35 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

35 repeat relationships: 31 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
4

Total granted

$464k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
+233%

Still filing today

54%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthInternationalHousing & ShelterEducationYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NL
    NEW LIFE FAMILY SERVICES
    8× · 2017–2024 · $42k · revenue +255%
  • FL
    FIRST LOVE INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES
    8× · 2017–2024 · $37k · revenue +7%
  • C7
    C24 7 FATHER'S ARMS MINISTRIES
    8× · 2017–2024 · $28k · revenue +72%

Funded once

  • BU
    BEAUTIFUL U MINISTRIES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +82%
  • JF
    JETT FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +233%
  • CH
    CORRIE'S HOUSEgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +294%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mercy House Minneapolis
Human Services
2
Hope House of Northwest Michigan

Hope house of northwest michigan is a non-profit christian maternity home that provides a safe loving residential environment for single expectant young women. through up to two years of residence the organization offers housing baby…

Human Services
3
House of Charity

Feed those in need, house those experiencing homelessness, and empower individuals to achieve independence.

—
4
Family Housing Network of Fort Collins Inc

Faith Family Hospitality's mission is to support families experiencing homelessness to achieve sustainable self-sufficiency in a timely and dignified manner. This interfaith volunteer effort coordinates the work of 30 diverse Fort Collins…

Human Services
5
Life House Inc

Life house works to reconnect homeless and street youth to their dreams with a vision that no youth will be left homeless, alone, uncared for, or fending for themselves on the streets. our comprehensive service model aims to engage and…

Youth Development
6
Hope Gospel Mission Inc

Hope gospel mission exists to offer christ-centered, life changing help to the homeless and needy in western wisconsin.

Philanthropy
7
Freedom House Ministries

House of Hope Kansas City is unique, because we work with teens and their parents to find solutions and ultimately, restoration of healthy family relationships. We serve families in crisis with our program for residents to experience the…

Education
8
Family Promise in Anoka County

Family Promise in Anoka County (FPAC) empowers families experiencing housing insecurity to build a foundation of lasting independence.

Human Services
9
Christ House

Christ House provides 24-hour comprehensive and compassionate care for people experiencing homelessness with acute medical needs in the District of Columbia and offers assistance in addressing critical issues to help break the cycle of…

Housing & Shelter
10
Hope Ministries

Hope ministries is one of the largest private providers of free meals, safe shelter, and comprehensive life-recovery support for homeless, near-homeless, and hungry men, women, and children in iowa. the mission of hope ministries is to…

Human Services
11
The Dwelling Place

The Dwelling Place is a Christ-centered ministry providing healing and hope to victims of domestic abuse through supportive services and a safe, transitional place to call home.

Human Services
12
Missions Inc Programs

See Schedule O.Established in 1895, Missions Inc. Programs is a multi-service non-profit organization with a long history of providing services to those who are most in need, each year offering thousands of people, whose lives have been…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed My Starving Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is Fox Valley Pregnancy Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
21/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $123,429 · OtherCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONNEW LIFE FAMILY SERVICES: $41,993 · OtherNEW LIFE FAMILY SERVICESLINC MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL INC: $30,383 · OtherLINC MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL INCTLC PREGNANCY CENTER: $20,000 · OtherTLC PREGNANCY CENTERTRINITY FIRST LUTHERAN CHURCH: $11,500 · Other+19 more: $76,950 · Other+19 moreFIRST LOVE INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES: $36,952 · Human ServicesFIRST LOVE INTERNATION…C24 7 FATHER'S ARMS MINISTRIES: $28,000 · Human ServicesC24 7 FATHER'S ARMS MI…Solid Ground: $14,000 · Human ServicesSolid GroundValley Outreach: $6,500 · Human ServicesValley OutreachAMHERST H WILDER FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Human ServicesAMHERST H WILDER FOUND…+2 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesGillette Children's Hospital Foundation: $16,000 · HealthFox Valley Pregnancy Center: $2,000 · HealthJETT FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · HealthYOUNG LIFE: $18,500 · Youth DevelopmentREFUGE FOR WOMEN INC: $11,000 · Housing & ShelterE S T H E R Homes Inc: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterHOPE ACADEMY INC: $8,000 · EducationHOPE FARM SCHOOL: $3,500 · EducationFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $7,000 · InternationalHOPE INTERNATIONAL: $3,000 · International
Other$304,255Human Services$92,452Health$19,000Youth Development$18,500Housing & Shelter$16,000Education$11,500International$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEW LIFE FAMILY SERVICES: $41,993 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetFIRST LOVE INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES: $36,952 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetC24 7 FATHER'S ARMS MINISTRIES: $28,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $18,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGillette Children's Hospital Foundation: $16,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSolid Ground: $14,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetREFUGE FOR WOMEN INC: $11,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE ACADEMY INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $7,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $7,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetValley Outreach: $6,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetOPEN HANDS FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetAMHERST H WILDER FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetE S T H E R Homes Inc: $5,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetHOPE FARM SCHOOL: $3,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE INTERNATIONAL: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFox Valley Pregnancy Center: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJOSEPHS COAT INC: $1,950 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN CUPBOARD EMERGENCY FOOD SHELF DBA OPEN CUPBOARD: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJETT FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCORRIE'S HOUSE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetURBAN VENTURES LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEW LIFE FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds FIRST LOVE INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds C24 7 FATHER'S ARMS MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds Gillette Children's Hospital Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Solid Ground ↗
  • Who funds REFUGE FOR WOMEN INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Valley Outreach ↗
  • Who funds OPEN HANDS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMHERST H WILDER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds E S T H E R Homes Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOPE FARM SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds HOPE INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds Fox Valley Pregnancy Center ↗
  • Who funds JOSEPHS COAT INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN CUPBOARD EMERGENCY FOOD SHELF DBA OPEN CUPBOARD ↗
  • Who funds BEAUTIFUL U MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds JETT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CORRIE'S HOUSE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Saint Paul & Minnesota FoundationMN20.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Catholic Community Foundation of Minnesota · Otto Bremer Trust · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Edina Realty Foundation · The Jamf Nation Global Foundation · Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Hardenbergh Foundation · Fred C and Katherine B Andersen Foundation · Fr Bigelow Foundation · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Wilford Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Wilford Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wilford Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph