Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Wicklander Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$70k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
—
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$121kEducation$100kHealth$87kHuman Services$72kArts & Culture$51kReligion$47kFood & Nutrition$11kPublic Benefit$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 15 grants below total $57,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $70,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $12,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$5,000
Median grant
—
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Big Shoulders Fund$6,500
Boys and Girls Clubs of Chicago$6,500
Chicago Jesuit Academy$6,500
Shirly Ryan Ability Lab$6,500
After School Matters$5,000
Mercy Home for Boys and Girls$5,000
Misericordia Foundation$5,000
Our Lady of Tepeyac$5,000
Chicago Youth Symphony Orchestra$3,000
Josephinum Academy$2,000
DePaul University$1,500
Fenwick High School$1,500
The Chicago Help Initiative$1,500
Cincinatti Childrens Hospital$1,000
Community Support Services$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SHARING CONNECTIONS: $4k → 7%BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK: $4k → 14%BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK: $4k → 14%ASPIRE: $1k → 14%BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK: $4k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $1k → 14%THE LEADERSHOP: $3k → 14%THE LEADERSHOP: $3k → 14%THE LEADER SHOP: $2k → 14%THE LEADERSHOP: $1k → 14%SALUTE: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$447k · 31 repeat orgs$63k to everyone else

31 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
28

Total granted

$447k
$57k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+54%

Still filing today

29%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentArts & CulturePublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BS
    Big Shoulders Fund
    5× · 2017–2021 · $28k · revenue +67%
  • UV
    UNITING VOICES
    5× · 2017–2021 · $25k · revenue +22%
  • AS
    AFTER SCHOOL MATTERS INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $21k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • BA
    Boys and Girls Club Chicago
    one grant, 2022 · $8k
  • EV
    EL VALOR CORPORATION
    one grant, 2021 · $7k · revenue +12%
  • DU
    DEPAUL UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue +11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
2
Big Brothers-Big Sisters of Metropolitan Chicago

Create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite and empower the promise of youth. we nurture children, strengthen communities and believe that inherent in every child is the ability to succeed and thrive in life.

—
3
The Chicago Scholars Foundation

Chicago scholars is transforming the leadership landscape of our city by resolving the fundamental barriers to success for academically driven, first generation college students from under-resourced communities.

Education
4
Junior Achievement of Chicago

To inspire and prepare young people to succeed in a global economy

International
5
Kipp Chicago Schools

The team at kipp chicago schools is guided by a simple, yet powerful mission: to create a network of excellent schools in chicago that teach our students the character and academic skills necessary to succeed in college and beyond, and to…

Education
6
A Better Chicago

A better chicago is changing how chicago fights poverty by investing in bold ideas that create opportunity for our youth.

Human Services
7
Loyola University of Chicago

We are chicago's jesuit, catholic university - a diverse community seeking god in all things and working to expand knowledge in the service of humanity through learning, justice, and faith.

Education
8
Alternatives Inc

Alternatives, inc.'s mission is to facilitate personal development,strengthen family relationships and enhance the community's well being. serving over 3,000 youth and families annually, the organization offers a range of counseling and…

Health
9
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
10
Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago

Ann & robert h. lurie children's hospital of chicago is dedicated to the health and well-being of all children. as the pediatric teaching facility for northwestern university feinberg school of medicine, this commitment drives us to be a…

Health
11
Illinois Children's Healthcare Foundation
Human Services
12
Skills for Chicago

See schedule othe mission of skills is to stand as a life-changing employment resource connecting underrepresented job seekers to employers with opportunities across industries. we do this by building multi-level, trusted relationships…

Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is After School Matters Inc; the most unlike its peers is Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
18/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MISERICORDIA: $35,000 · OtherMISERICORDIACHICAGO JESUIT ACADEMY: $26,000 · OtherCHICAGO JESUIT ACADEMYMERCY HOME FOR BOYS &: $24,000 · OtherMERCY HOME FOR BOYS &Shirly Ryan Ability Lab: $24,000 · OtherShirly Ryan Ability LabMERCY HOME FOR BOYS AND GIRLS: $21,000 · OtherMERCY HOME FOR BOYS AND GIRLSOUR LADY OF TEPEYAC: $20,000 · OtherOUR LADY OF TEPEYACOUR LADY OF TEPEYAC HS: $20,000 · OtherOUR LADY OF TEPEYAC HSChicago Jesuit Academy: $19,500 · OtherChicago Jesuit AcademyCHICAGO YOUTH SYMPHONY: $17,500 · OtherAfter School Matters: $15,000 · OtherBoys and Girls Clubs of Chicago: $14,000 · OtherAMATE HOUSE: $14,000 · OtherBig Shoulders Fund: $14,000 · Other+31 more: $84,400 · Other+31 moreBig Shoulders Fund: $27,500 · EducationBig Shoulder…AFTER SCHOOL MATTERS INC: $21,000 · EducationAFTER SCHOOL…DEPAUL UNIVERSITY: $5,500 · EducationDEPAUL UNIVE…ELIM CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $3,000 · EducationBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGO: $18,000 · Youth DevelopmentUNION LEAGUE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $10,500 · Human ServicesTHE LEADERSHOP: $8,000 · Human ServicesSHARING CONNECTIONS INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesSALUTE INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesTHE NIGHT MINISTRY: $1,000 · Human ServicesASPIRE OF ILLINOIS: $1,000 · Human ServicesUNITING VOICES: $25,000 · Arts & CultureRehabilitation Institute of Chicago: $11,500 · HealthIMERMAN ANGELS: $1,500 · HealthAIDS Foundation of Chicago: $1,000 · HealthBRAIN RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $500 · Health+1 more: $250 · HealthFRIENDS OF FISHER HOUSE - ILLINOIS INC: $6,000 · Public Benefit
Other$348,400Education$57,000Youth Development$33,000Human Services$26,000Arts & Culture$25,000Health$14,750Public Benefit$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBig Shoulders Fund: $27,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNITING VOICES: $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAFTER SCHOOL MATTERS INC: $21,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGO: $18,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNION LEAGUE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRehabilitation Institute of Chicago: $11,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $10,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LEADERSHOP: $8,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetEL VALOR CORPORATION: $6,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF FISHER HOUSE - ILLINOIS INC: $6,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetDEPAUL UNIVERSITY: $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHARING CONNECTIONS INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetELIM CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSALUTE INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetIMERMAN ANGELS: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NIGHT MINISTRY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASPIRE OF ILLINOIS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAIDS Foundation of Chicago: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRAIN RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Big Shoulders Fund ↗
  • Who funds UNITING VOICES ↗
  • Who funds AFTER SCHOOL MATTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds UNION LEAGUE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS ↗
  • Who funds Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LEADERSHOP ↗
  • Who funds EL VALOR CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF FISHER HOUSE - ILLINOIS INC ↗
  • Who funds DEPAUL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SHARING CONNECTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds ELIM CHRISTIAN SERVICES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Service Club of ChicagoIL15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Service Club of Chicago · Baird Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Edmond and Alice Opler Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Wicklander Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Wicklander Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Wicklander Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Wicklander Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wicklander Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph