Skip to content

· Private foundation

The White Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$216k
Granted FY2020
14
Grants FY2020
8
States reached
$52k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of The White Foundation’s FY2023 grant dollars went to Guidestream Charitable Gift Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2023 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year The White Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 12 organizations, $216k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

11
’18
12
’19
12
’20
16
’21
0
’22
0
’23

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2023.

Philanthropy$2.5MReligion$497kEducation$291kRecreation & Sports$45kInternational$37kEnvironment$12kCommunity Improvement$4kHealth$2kOther$0
02FY2020 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k3 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $150k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $52k
$10,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Spring Arbor University$52,000
Ferndale Free Methodist Church$40,000
Light and Life Arabic Free Methodist Church$15,300
Free Methodist Foundation$15,000
Global Scholars$15,000
Impact Middle East$15,000
Southfield Christian School$10,000
Faith and Learning International$10,000
Caspian Project$10,000
SonSet Solutions$10,000
Africa Inland Mission$10,000
Fellowship International Mission$5,000
Somerset Beach Camp$5,000
Free Methodist Church - USA$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 96% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Holiday Free Methodist Church: $20k → 11%Ferndale Free Methodist Church: $40k → 8%Mancelona Free Methodist Church: $20k → 9%Light & Life Arabic Free Methodist Church: $20k → 10%GuideStream Charitable Gift Fund: $1.4M → 13%Somerset Beach Camp: $40k → 14%The Harbor: $10k → 21%Global Scholars: $15k → 5%Africa Inland Mission: $10k → 6%Caspian Project: $10k → 8%SonSet Solutions: $10k → 13%Impact Middle East: $15k → 12%Faith and Learning International: $10k → 7%Ferndale Free Methodist Church: $40k → 8%Light and Life Arabic Free Methodist Church: $15k → 10%GuideStream Charitable Gift Fund: $1.0M → 13%Somerset Beach Campground: $20k → 14%Global Scholars: $15k → 5%Africa Inland Mission: $10k → 6%Caspian Project: $10k → 8%SonSet Solutions: $10k → 13%Impact Middle East: $15k → 12%Faith and Learning International: $10k → 7%Ferndale Free Methodist Church: $40k → 8%Spring Arbor University: $66k → 13%Global Scholars: $15k → 5%Africa Inland Mission: $10k → 6%Caspian Project: $10k → 8%SonSet Solutions: $10k → 13%Impact Middle East: $15k → 12%Faith and Learning International: $10k → 7%Ferndale Free Methodist Church: $40k → 8%Spring Arbor University: $52k → 13%Global Scholars: $10k → 5%Africa Inland Mission: $10k → 6%Caspian Project: $10k → 8%SonSet Solutions: $10k → 13%Impact Middle East: $10k → 12%Southfield Christian School: $10k → 8%Spring Arbor University: $40k → 13%Hope in View: $15k → 13%Southfield Christian School: $10k → 8%Spring Arbor University: $40k → 13%Southfield Christian School: $10k → 8%Mission Igniter: $20k → 13%Southfield Christian School: $8k → 8%Central Africa Healthcare Organization: $15k → 13%GuideStream Charitable Gift Fund: $9k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
MA
IN
OH
PA
CA
CO
KS
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 54% of The White Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The White Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$847k · 15 repeat orgs$119k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2020, 1 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
6

Total granted

$847k
$44k

Still filing today

33%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21
ReligionEducationInternationalPhilanthropyHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    Spring Arbor University
    4× · 2018–2021 · $198k · revenue +8%
  • IM
    IMPACT MIDDLE EAST INC
    4× · 2018–2021 · $55k · revenue +55%
  • SS
    SONSET SOLUTIONS INC
    4× · 2018–2021 · $40k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
  • TH
    The Harbor
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • IC
    International Child Care Ministries
    one grant, 2019 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
Ason International Inc

Assisting national Christian leaders around the world.

Human Services
3
Timothy Two Project International

Reaching and teaching pastors in the majority world.

Religion
4
Manna University

Manna University is a biblical higher education institution dedicated to educating, equipping, and empowering emerging leaders to change the world.

Education
5
Olivet University

Providing guality Christian education to the network generation

Education
6
Christian Leaders for Africa Inc

Christian leaders from africa promotes christian theological training & education of local leaders in kenya and throughout africa. it invests in undergraduate, masters, and phd scholarships, faculty support for african professors and…

Religion
7
Seek Partners International Inc

Christian leadership development with formal and non-formal theological education and training.

Religion
8
Christar International Inc

Christar international serves as a catalyst to the network of christar ministries by facilitating and encouraging partnerships with churches who sen dout men and women who proclaim the gospel for life-giving transformation in communitiesw…

Religion
9
Next Worldwide Inc

With a desire to see the Gospel proclaimed in all nations, we exist to make and multiply disciples of the next generation through the vehicles of church-planting missions and missional leadership training.

—
10
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
11
Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

—
12
Spiritual Directors International

Spiritual Directors International inspires and connects seekers with spiritual guidance around the world and across traditions. Spiritual Directors International provides multi-faith and global education

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Global Scholars; the most unlike its peers is Central Africa Health Care Organization. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GuideStream Charitable Gift Fund: $2,451,869 · PhilanthropyGuideStream Charitable Gift Fund+1 more: $30,000 · PhilanthropyFERNDALE FREE METHODIST CHURCH: $160,000 · OtherFERNDALE FREE METHO…GLOBAL SCHOLARS: $55,000 · OtherGLOBAL SCHOLARSTHE FREE METHODIST FOUNDATION: $47,500 · OtherTHE FREE METHODIST …Somerset Beach Camp: $45,000 · OtherSomerset Beach CampCaspian Project: $40,000 · OtherCaspian ProjectAFRICA INLAND MISSION INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED: $40,000 · OtherAFRICA INLAND MISSI…SOUTHFIELD CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $37,500 · OtherSOUTHFIELD CHRISTIA…Light & Life Arabic Free Methodist Church: $35,300 · OtherLight & Life Arabic…FELLOWSHIP INTERNATIONAL MISSION: $20,000 · OtherMission Igniter: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherMANCELONA FREE METHODIST CHURCH: $20,000 · OtherHOLIDAY FREE METHODIST CHURCH: $20,000 · Other+6 more: $38,100 · Other+6 moreSpring Arbor University: $198,000 · EducationSONSET SOLUTIONS INC: $40,000 · ReligionFaith and Learning International NFP: $30,000 · ReligionIMPACT MIDDLE EAST INC: $55,000 · InternationalHOPE IN VIEW INC: $15,000 · Health
Philanthropy$2,481,869Other$598,400Education$198,000Religion$70,000International$55,000Health$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGuideStream Charitable Gift Fund: $2,451,869 over 3y, 21% of budgetSpring Arbor University: $198,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetIMPACT MIDDLE EAST INC: $55,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetGLOBAL SCHOLARS: $55,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetSONSET SOLUTIONS INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetCENTRAL AFRICA HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION: $30,000 over 3y, 5.3% of budgetFaith and Learning International NFP: $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHOPE IN VIEW INC: $15,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GuideStream Charitable Gift Fund ↗
  • Who funds Spring Arbor University ↗
  • Who funds IMPACT MIDDLE EAST INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL SCHOLARS ↗
  • Who funds SONSET SOLUTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL AFRICA HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION ↗
  • Who funds Faith and Learning International NFP ↗
  • Who funds HOPE IN VIEW INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

GuideStream Charitable Gift FundMI30.5× affinity12 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: GuideStream Charitable Gift Fund · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The White Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The White Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The White Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The White Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on White’s filings →

    More from the funding graph