Skip to content

· Private foundation

The White Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$113k
Granted FY2023
23
Grants FY2023
9
States reached
$10k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

50% of The White Family Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Toledo Community Foundation Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year The White Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 9 organizations, $113k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

5
’17
2
’18
4
’19
2
’20
4
’21
10
’22
9
’23
0
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$698kPhilanthropy$401k
02FY2023 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k21 grants · $93k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$4,370
Median grant
9
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI$10,000
OHIO UNIVERSITY$9,500
UNIVERSITY OF AKRON$9,000
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY LIMA$7,500
BLACK HILLS STATE UNIVERSITY$5,440
UNION UNIVERSITY$5,000
OBERLIN COLLEGE$5,000
INDIANA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY$5,000
WILMINGTON COLLEGE$4,500
UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON$4,500
MURRAY STATE UNIVERSITY$4,370
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY$4,250
CORNELL UNIVERSITY$4,000
WASHINGTON AND JEFFERSON COLLEGE$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 66% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%WASHINGTON & JEFFERSON COLLEGE: $8k → 12%MS GIFT DAF: $134k → 9%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $5k → 17%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 16%UNION UNIVERSITY: $5k → 15%TENNESSEE TECH: $10k → 19%BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY: $6k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $5k → 12%INDIANA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $5k → 19%WILMINGTON COLLEGE: $5k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF AKRON: $12k → 13%OBERLIN COLLEGE: $5k → 13%BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY: $8k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI: $13k → 16%LOURDES: $5k → 18%OHIO UNIVERSITY: $13k → 22%BLACK HILLS STATE UNIVERSITY: $6k → 11%MOUNT MARTY COLLEGE: $10k → 11%MS GIFT DAF: $33k → 9%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $5k → 17%UNION UNIVERSITY: $5k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF AKRON: $6k → 13%THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY AT LIMA: $7k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI: $7k → 16%OHIO UNIVERSITY: $10k → 22%BLACK HILLS STATE UNIVERSITY: $17k → 11%MOUNT MARTY COLLEGE: $10k → 11%MS GIFT DAF: $33k → 9%THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY AT LIMA: $5k → 13%OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $17k → 15%OHIO UNIVERSITY: $10k → 22%BLACK HILLS STATE UNIVERSITY: $15k → 11%OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $11k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO: $9k → 18%BLACK HILLS STATE UNIVERSITY: $8k → 11%OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO: $8k → 18%BLACK HILLS STATE UNIVERSITY: $8k → 11%OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 15%BLACK HILLS STATE UNIVERSITY: $6k → 11%OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $9k → 15%BLACK HILLS STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 11%OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $7k → 15%GREATER TOLEDO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $67k → 18%GREATER TOLEDO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $67k → 18%GREATER TOLEDO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $33k → 18%GREATER TOLEDO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $33k → 18%OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY LIMA: $8k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
IL
MI
NY
OR
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
UT
CO
NE
KY
TN
MS
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of The White Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 50% of the giving stays in OH; by stated purpose, 38%.

The White Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 12% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$600k · 34 repeat orgs$284k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +21% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

34 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2023, 16 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
21

Total granted

$600k
$56k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+7%

Still filing today

26%
5%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $201k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MM
    MOUNT MARTY UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2017–2020 · $29k · revenue +63%
  • WJ
    WASHINGTON & JEFFERSON COLLEGE
    3× · 2021–2023 · $17k · revenue +21%
  • Cornell University
    3× · 2021–2023 · $12k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • L
    LOURDES
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
2
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
3
Loyola University

Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…

Education
4
Xavier University

Xavier is a jesuit catholic university rooted in the liberal arts tradition. our mission is to educate each student intellectually, morally, and spiritually. we create learning opportunities through rigorous academic and professional…

Education
5
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
6
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
7
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
8
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
9
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
10
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
11
Walsh University Inc

Walsh university is an independent, coeducational catholic, liberal arts and sciences institution dedicated to educating its students to become leaders in service to others through a values-based education with an international perspective…

Education
12
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mount Marty University; the most unlike its peers is Toledo Community Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $200,554 · OtherIndividual grant recipientOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $67,100 · OtherOHIO STATE UNIVERSITYBLACK HILLS STATE UNIVERSITY: $63,990 · OtherBLACK HILLS STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF WYOMING: $56,490 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WYOMINGUNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI: $45,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATIOHIO UNIVERSITY: $43,600 · OtherOHIO UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF AKRON: $35,200 · Other+43 more: $255,730 · Other+43 moreTOLEDO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $200,554 · PhilanthropyTOLEDO COMMUNITY FOU…MOUNT MARTY UNIVERSITY: $29,000 · EducationMOUNT MARTY U…WASHINGTON & JEFFERSON COLLEGE: $16,500 · EducationWASHINGTON & …THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $14,500 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES …Cornell University: $12,000 · EducationCornell Unive…Wilmington College: $10,700 · EducationWilmington Co…UNION UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · EducationUNION UNIVERS…INDIANA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · EducationINDIANA WESLE…Oberlin College: $10,000 · EducationOberlin Colle…LOURDES UNIVERSITY: $7,500 · EducationLOURDES UNIVE…CAPITAL UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · EducationUniversity of Dayton: $4,500 · Education+1 more: $1,250 · Education
Other$767,664Philanthropy$200,554Education$130,950

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTOLEDO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $200,554 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMOUNT MARTY UNIVERSITY: $29,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON & JEFFERSON COLLEGE: $16,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $14,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University: $12,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWilmington College: $10,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNION UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINDIANA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOberlin College: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOURDES UNIVERSITY: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Dayton: $4,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT XAVIER UNIVERSITY: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TOLEDO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MOUNT MARTY UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON & JEFFERSON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds Cornell University ↗
  • Who funds Wilmington College ↗
  • Who funds UNION UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds INDIANA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Oberlin College ↗
  • Who funds LOURDES UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CAPITAL UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tulsa Community FoundationOK13× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tulsa Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The White Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The White Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The White Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The White Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on White Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph