Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Westlake Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$60k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$53kEducation$45kRecreation & Sports$36kHuman Services$36kEmployment$28kInternational$12kFood & Nutrition$12kReligion$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $45k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$5,250
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SHIELDS & STRIPES$15,000
THE FUND OF AMERICAN STUDIES$7,500
ST JOSEPH'S CHURCH$5,550
A PLACE TO BE$5,250
GABRIEL PROJECT$5,250
VETERANS ADVOCACY SERVICES$5,250
FOOD FOR THE POOR$5,250
A FARM LESS ORDINARY$5,000
WOMEN GIVING BACK$5,000
Individual grant recipient$750
SPECIAL OLYMPICS$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $49k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%VETERANS ADVOCACY SERVICES: $8k → 8%A FARM LESS ORDINARY: $10k → 7%VETERANS ADVOCACY SERVICES: $5k → 8%A FARM LESS ORDINARY: $10k → 7%VETERANS ADVOCACY SERVICES: $5k → 8%A FARM LESS ORDINARY: $5k → 7%VETERANS ADVOCACY SERVICES: $3k → 8%A FARM LESS ORDINARY: $3k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
VA
MD
AZ
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$191k · 14 repeat orgs$46k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +80% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
16

Total granted

$191k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+80%
+23%

Still filing today

50%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsInternationalEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    SHIELDS AND STRIPES INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $34k · revenue +163%
  • TF
    THE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES
    5× · 2020–2024 · $30k · revenue +80%
  • AF
    A FARM LESS ORDINARY
    4× · 2019–2024 · $28k · revenue +234%

Funded once

  • GC
    GONZAGA COLLEGE HS
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • UA
    U AND D JESUIT
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • LI
    LINK INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2020 · $4k · revenue -17%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Forum on the Arms Trade Inc

The Forum connects civil society experts to strengthen public efforts on arms transfers, security, and weapons issues, offering a hub for expertise, analysis, and resources.

International
2
Fund for the Global Fund

To encourage individuals, corporations, foundations and donor governments to support the global fund, an international foundation focused on ending three of the world's most deadly infectious diseases.

Human Services
3
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
4
Lyme Disease Biobank Foundation

To advance knowledge and facilitate research of the pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of lyme disease and other tick-borne infections.

Health
5
National Veterans Legal Services Program Inc

To provide at no cost legal assistance to veterans of the u.s. armed forces and current service members.

—
6
Foreign Policy for America

Foreign Policy For America is a nonpartisan advocacy organization founded to strengthen support for principled American engagement in the world.

—
7
Food & Water Watch

Food & water watch conducts extensive research and public education to ensure the food and water we consume is safe, accessible and sustainably produced. so we can all enjoy and trust in what we eat and drink, we help people take charge of…

Food & Nutrition
8
Foodshot Global Inc

Accelerate the transformation to a healthy, sustainable and equitable food system.

Food & Nutrition
9
Fdd Action

FDD Action is a non-profit, non-partisan 504(c)4 organization established to advocate for effective policies to promote U.S. National Security and defend free nations.

Community Improvement
10
Womens Foreign Policy Group Inc

Founded in 1995 wfpg works to expand the foreign policy dialogue across policital divides and generations and to support women at every stake of their careers. as champions of womens leadership we are proud of our role in expanding the…

International
11
Federation of Virginia Food Banks

Facilitating statewide collaboration among Virginia's food banks, partners, and neighbors to improve nutrition security and empower strong, healthy communities.

—
12
Washington State Farm Bureau Federation

Farm bureau is a voluntary, grassroots advocacy organization representing the social economic interests of farm and ranch families at the local, state, and national levels. by providing leadership and organizational skills, farm bureau…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc; the most unlike its peers is Veterans Advocacy Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
7/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES: $30,000 · OtherTHE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIESDEEP CREEK LAKE SAILING: $26,600 · OtherDEEP CREEK LAKE SAILINGGABRIEL PROJECT: $12,268 · OtherGABRIEL PROJECTST JOSEPHS CHURCH: $5,550 · OtherA PLACE TO BE: $5,250 · OtherGONZAGA COLLEGE HS: $5,000 · OtherU AND D JESUIT: $5,000 · OtherGEORGETOWN VISITATION: $4,000 · OtherGONZAGA: $4,000 · Other+14 more: $17,067 · Other+14 moreA FARM LESS ORDINARY: $28,000 · Human ServicesA FARM LESS ORDINARYVETERANS ADVOCACY SERVICES INC: $21,250 · Human ServicesVETERANS ADVOCACY SERVIC…Border Patrol Foundation: $3,000 · Human ServicesBorder Patrol FoundationSHIELDS AND STRIPES INC: $34,000 · HealthSHIELDS AND STRIPES IN…NATIONAL CAPITAL LYME DISEASE ASSOCIATION: $13,000 · HealthNATIONAL CAPITAL LYME …+1 more: $750 · HealthSOCCER WITHOUT BORDERS: $7,000 · Recreation & SportsSHOOTING TOUCH INC: $2,000 · Recreation & SportsFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $8,250 · International+1 more: $102 · InternationalWomen Giving Back Inc: $5,000 · Employment
Other$114,735Human Services$52,250Health$47,750Recreation & Sports$9,000International$8,352Employment$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSHIELDS AND STRIPES INC: $34,000 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetTHE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES: $30,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetA FARM LESS ORDINARY: $28,000 over 4y, 6.0% of budgetVETERANS ADVOCACY SERVICES INC: $21,250 over 4y, 14% of budgetNATIONAL CAPITAL LYME DISEASE ASSOCIATION: $13,000 over 2y, 7.8% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $8,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOCCER WITHOUT BORDERS: $7,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetA PLACE TO BE: $5,250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWomen Giving Back Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLINK INCORPORATED: $3,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBorder Patrol Foundation: $3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSHOOTING TOUCH INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR THE HUNGRY INC: $102 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SHIELDS AND STRIPES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES ↗
  • Who funds A FARM LESS ORDINARY ↗
  • Who funds VETERANS ADVOCACY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL CAPITAL LYME DISEASE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗
  • Who funds SOCCER WITHOUT BORDERS ↗
  • Who funds A PLACE TO BE ↗
  • Who funds Women Giving Back Inc ↗
  • Who funds LINK INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds Border Patrol Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SHOOTING TOUCH INC ↗
  • Who funds LYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE HUNGRY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodDC11.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Westlake Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Westlake Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Westlake Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Westlake Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Westlake’s filings →

More from the funding graph