Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Warren Foundation Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$41k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$224kHealth$36kHuman Services$14kArts & Culture$7kYouth Development$7kEducation$6kInternational$4kRecreation & Sports$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$664k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CARING HANDS$30,000
HIGHLAND MEMORY GARDENS$5,000
CHRIS NORTON FOUNDATION$5,000
LLAA FOUNDATION$500
SEP DOLLARS FOR SCHOLARS$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PUPPY JAKE FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MN
NY
OR
IA
CA
AR
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$254k · 7 repeat orgs$57k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +90% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
23

Total granted

$254k
$52k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+90%
+20%

Still filing today

14%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesInternationalArts & CultureFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CARING HANDS
    8× · 2017–2024 · $216k
  • M
    MOSAIC
    3× · 2019–2022 · $10k
  • CN
    CHRIS NORTON FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $8k

Funded once

  • AU
    ALTOONA UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2018 · $6k
  • YE
    YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES SHELTER
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
  • EI
    EASTERN IOWA DIAPER BANK
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Imagine a Cure Cancer Treatment
Health
2
We Beat Cancer
Philanthropy
3
Mya Strong Foundation
Human Services
4
Connect Thru Cancer

Connect thru cancer's mission is to improve the quality of life for cancer patients and their families by providing physical and emotional support programs that foster connection, provide a sense of normalcy and focus on fun.

Health
5
Ryan's Case for Smiles

Ryan's case for smiles helps with the stress and emotional impact of illness in the here and now. our whimsical pillowcases give children an emotional boost, while our copingspace and justsibs resources and tools help families better…

Human Services
6
Beat Childhood Cancer Foundation Inc

Beat childhood cancer drives childhood cancer research and raises awareness, making a difference in kids' survival today. our vision is to change the story for the next family by finding viable treatments and ultimately, cures for…

Health
7
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
8
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
9
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
10
Cannonball Kids' Cancer Foundation Inc

Cannonball kids cancer foundation (ckc) funds innovative, accessible research for children fighting cancer to provide better treatments and quality of life, and to educate for change, so that children arent forced to sacrifice their future…

Health
11
Chance for Life

Chance for life's mission is to raise awareness and funds for critical research and clinical trials for pediatric cancer in the united states of america.

Health
12
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Stupid Cancer Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Young Mens Christian Association of Greater Des Moines. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CARING HANDS: $216,000 · OtherCARING HANDSMOSAIC: $10,000 · Other+20 more: $60,800 · Other+20 moreFOOD BANK OF IOWA: $6,500 · Food & NutritionPUPPY JAKE FOUNDATION: $3,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $1,350 · Human ServicesCANDO CANCER: $2,000 · HealthSTUPID CANCER INC: $2,000 · HealthRUTH HARBOR: $3,000 · Housing & ShelterGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $3,000 · PhilanthropyAmigos For Christ Inc: $1,650 · InternationalCLASS ACT PRODUCTIONS INC: $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$286,800Food & Nutrition$6,500Human Services$4,350Health$4,000Housing & Shelter$3,000Philanthropy$3,000International$1,650Arts & Culture$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOOD BANK OF IOWA: $6,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRUTH HARBOR: $3,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPUPPY JAKE FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildrens Cancer Therapy Development Institute: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTUPID CANCER INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmigos For Christ Inc: $1,650 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLASS ACT PRODUCTIONS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER DES MOINES: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF IOWA ↗
  • Who funds RUTH HARBOR ↗
  • Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PUPPY JAKE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CANDO CANCER ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds Childrens Cancer Therapy Development Institute ↗
  • Who funds STUPID CANCER INC ↗
  • Who funds Amigos For Christ Inc ↗
  • Who funds TRAIN TO INSPIRE ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CLASS ACT PRODUCTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER DES MOINES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community FdnIA17× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community Fdn · Meredith Corporation Foundation · Prairie Meadows Race Track and Casino Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Warren Foundation Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Warren Foundation Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 44%
  • Childrens Cancer Therapy Development Institute: 44% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Warren Foundation Trust?

Find your warmest path to The Warren Foundation Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Warren’s filings →

More from the funding graph