Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Warren Foundation Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$41k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Food & Nutrition$224kHealth$36kHuman Services$14kArts & Culture$7kYouth Development$7kEducation$6kInternational$4kRecreation & Sports$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$664k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CARING HANDS$30,000
HIGHLAND MEMORY GARDENS$5,000
CHRIS NORTON FOUNDATION$5,000
LLAA FOUNDATION$500
SEP DOLLARS FOR SCHOLARS$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PUPPY JAKE FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
MN
NY
OR
IA
CA
AR
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$254k · 7 repeat orgs$57k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +90% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
23

Total granted

$254k
$52k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+90%
+4%

Still filing today

14%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesInternationalArts & CultureFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CARING HANDS
    8× · 2017–2024 · $216k
  • M
    MOSAIC
    3× · 2019–2022 · $10k
  • CN
    CHRIS NORTON FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $8k

Funded once

  • AU
    ALTOONA UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2018 · $6k
  • YE
    YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES SHELTER
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
  • EI
    EASTERN IOWA DIAPER BANK
    one grant, 2020 · $4k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Imagine a Cure Cancer Treatment
Health
2
We Beat Cancer
Philanthropy
3
Mya Strong Foundation
Human Services
4
Connect Thru Cancer

Connect thru cancer's mission is to improve the quality of life for cancer patients and their families by providing physical and emotional support programs that foster connection, provide a sense of normalcy and focus on fun.

Health
5
Ryan's Case for Smiles

Ryan's case for smiles helps with the stress and emotional impact of illness in the here and now. our whimsical pillowcases give children an emotional boost, while our copingspace and justsibs resources and tools help families better…

Human Services
6
Beat Childhood Cancer Foundation Inc

Beat childhood cancer drives childhood cancer research and raises awareness, making a difference in kids' survival today. our vision is to change the story for the next family by finding viable treatments and ultimately, cures for…

Health
7
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

8
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
9
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
10
Cannonball Kids' Cancer Foundation Inc

Cannonball kids cancer foundation (ckc) funds innovative, accessible research for children fighting cancer to provide better treatments and quality of life, and to educate for change, so that children arent forced to sacrifice their future…

Health
11
Chance for Life

Chance for life's mission is to raise awareness and funds for critical research and clinical trials for pediatric cancer in the united states of america.

Health
12
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Stupid Cancer Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Young Mens Christian Association of Greater Des Moines. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CARING HANDS — $216,000 · OtherCARING HANDSMOSAIC — $10,000 · Other+20 more — $60,800 · Other+20 moreFOOD BANK OF IOWA — $6,500 · Food & NutritionPUPPY JAKE FOUNDATION — $3,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY RESOURCE CENTER INC — $1,350 · Human ServicesCANDO CANCER — $2,000 · HealthSTUPID CANCER INC — $2,000 · HealthGARY SINISE FOUNDATION — $3,000 · PhilanthropyRUTH HARBOR — $3,000 · Housing & ShelterAmigos For Christ Inc — $1,650 · InternationalCLASS ACT PRODUCTIONS INC — $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$286,800Food & Nutrition$6,500Human Services$4,350Health$4,000Philanthropy$3,000Housing & Shelter$3,000International$1,650Arts & Culture$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFOOD BANK OF IOWA — $6,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPUPPY JAKE FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRUTH HARBOR — $3,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSTUPID CANCER INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildrens Cancer Therapy Development Institute — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmigos For Christ Inc — $1,650 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLASS ACT PRODUCTIONS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER DES MOINES — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF IOWA
  • Who funds PUPPY JAKE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds RUTH HARBOR
  • Who funds CANDO CANCER
  • Who funds STUPID CANCER INC
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC
  • Who funds Childrens Cancer Therapy Development Institute
  • Who funds Amigos For Christ Inc
  • Who funds TRAIN TO INSPIRE
  • Who funds FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER INC
  • Who funds CLASS ACT PRODUCTIONS INC
  • Who funds THE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER DES MOINES

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community FdnIA17× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community Fdn · Meredith Corporation Foundation · Prairie Meadows Race Track and Casino Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Warren Foundation Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 44%
  • Childrens Cancer Therapy Development Institute44% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Warren Foundation Trust?

Find your warmest path to The Warren Foundation Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph