Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Ward Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$287k
Granted FY2024still arriving
24
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$958kHealth$420kFood & Nutrition$191kArts & Culture$141kRecreation & Sports$140kHuman Services$74kInternational$31kCivil Rights$23kOther$0
02FY2024 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $205k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$7.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UPLIFT EDUCATION$50,000
NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK$30,000
UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER$30,000
WOODALL RODGERS PARK FOUNDATION$25,000
BELTON EDUCATION ENRICHMENT FOUNDATION$25,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
SAMARITANS PURSE$15,000
ALSACST JUDE'S CHILDREN RES$10,000
THE MAGIC YARD PROJECT$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
JUNE SHELTON SCHOOL$10,000
DALLAS ARCHITECTURE FORUM$10,000
THE BOOT CAMPAIGN INC$10,000
SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION-MD ANDERSON$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 63% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%AMERICA'S WARRIOR PARTNERSHIP: $10k → 18%REBUILDING WARRIORS: $5k → 11%ADAPTIVE TRAINING FOUNDATION: $15k → 8%ARKANSAS CENTER FOR INDEPENDENCE: $10k → 25%DPA'S ASSIST THE OFFICER FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF DALLAS INC: $100 → 14%CONNECTING POINT OF PARK CITIES: $200 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
NY
MA
CA
AR
TN
NC
OK
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 26 repeat orgs$292k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +62% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
34

Total granted

$1.8M
$176k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
+8%

Still filing today

54%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $115k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyRecreation & SportsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    Children's Hospital Corporation
    5× · 2017–2022 · $205k · revenue +91%
  • NT
    NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK
    7× · 2017–2024 · $191k · revenue +105%
  • WR
    Woodall Rodgers Park Foundation
    7× · 2017–2024 · $120k · revenue +151%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $30k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • BE
    BEVP-BIRD'S EYE VIEW
    one grant, 2019 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council

The mission of the Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council is to drive evidence-based improvement in patient care and health equity throughout the region.

—
2
Baylor Research Institute

To improve the care and well being of our community, nationally and internationally, through innovative clinically relevant research that is consistent with the mission, vision and values of Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).

Health
3
Disabled American Veterans of Texas Service Foundation
Human Services
4
Texas Trees Foundation

The mission of texas trees foundation is to improve the health of cities and people through the transformative power of trees.

—
5
Dallas Fallen Officer Foundation

To provide financial support and programs for fallen officer families. To raise awareness and advocate for national issues impacting officers.

—
6
Texas Wounded Warriors

The mission of the texas wounded warrior foundation is to raise awareness, to honor, and to empower our wounded united state military warriors, enabling them to assimilate back to daily life upon their return from combat. we seek to…

Public Benefit
7
Dallas Va Research Corporation

The mission of the dallas va research corporation is to support scientific research, education, and rehabilitation to improve the lives of veterans and their families.

Health
8
Dallas Area Rape Crisis Center

To engage and educate communities to prevent sexual violence and to support survivors and their loved ones as they heal and thrive.

Human Services
9
Dallas Citizens Council

To lead and serve in the moments that matter the most for the people of dallas.

—
10
Wheelchairs for Warriors

Wheelchairs for warriors designs, builds, and delivers custom-fit, complex-rehab mobility solutions to veterans and first responders injured in the line of duty

Human Services
11
Children's Health System of Texas

With more than 1 million patient visits each year, Children's Health is North Texas' leading pediatric health system and among the largest in the nation. For more than a century, our mission has been clear: make life better for children.…

Health
12
Shield of Faith Missions

Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dallas Museum of Art; the most unlike its peers is Dpas Assist the Officer Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/40
Grantees still filing
22/40
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JUNE SHELTON SCHOOL: $578,406 · OtherJUNE SHELTON SCHOOLBELTON EDUCATION ENRICHMENT FOUNDATION: $195,000 · OtherBELTON EDUCATION ENRICHMENT FOUNDATIONNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $191,200 · OtherNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANKIndividual grant recipient: $67,631 · OtherUT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER: $60,200 · OtherNORTH TEXAS BROADCASTING INC: $49,480 · Other+30 more: $236,209 · Other+30 moreChildren's Hospital Corporation: $205,000 · HealthChildren's Hospita…Baylor Health Care System: $59,500 · HealthBaylor Health Care…FRONTLINE HEALING FOUNDATION: $35,000 · HealthFRONTLINE HEALING …SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $22,500 · HealthSEMPER FI & AMERIC…+4 more: $15,300 · HealthWoodall Rodgers Park Foundation: $120,000 · Recreation & SportsVETERAN OUTDOORS INC: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsDALLAS ARCHITECTURE FORUM: $55,500 · Arts & CultureELLEN NOEL ART MUSEUM OF THE PERMIAN BASIN: $10,000 · Arts & CultureDallas Museum of Art: $9,000 · Arts & Culture+3 more: $2,450 · Arts & CultureUPLIFT EDUCATION: $50,000 · EducationFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $4,000 · EducationAdaptive Training Foundation: $15,000 · Human ServicesAMERICA'S WARRIOR PARTNERSHIP INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE ARKANSAS CENTER FOR INDEPENDENCE: $9,500 · Human ServicesREBUILDING WARRIORS: $5,000 · Human Services+4 more: $1,300 · Human ServicesKERSHAW'S CHALLENGE: $15,000 · PhilanthropyCARRY THE LOAD: $14,200 · Philanthropy22KILL: $5,000 · PhilanthropyBeyond The Burn Foundation: $4,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $700 · Philanthropy
Other$1,378,126Health$337,300Recreation & Sports$125,000Arts & Culture$76,950Education$54,000Human Services$40,800Philanthropy$38,900

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $205,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $191,200 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWoodall Rodgers Park Foundation: $120,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetBaylor Health Care System: $59,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetDALLAS ARCHITECTURE FORUM: $55,500 over 7y, 7.6% of budgetUPLIFT EDUCATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRONTLINE HEALING FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $22,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAdaptive Training Foundation: $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetKERSHAW'S CHALLENGE: $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARRY THE LOAD: $14,200 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetThe Magic Yarn Project: $10,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetAMERICA'S WARRIOR PARTNERSHIP INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetELLEN NOEL ART MUSEUM OF THE PERMIAN BASIN: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BOOT CAMPAIGN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE ARKANSAS CENTER FOR INDEPENDENCE: $9,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDallas Museum of Art: $9,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budget22KILL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetVETERAN OUTDOORS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetREBUILDING WARRIORS: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetMIGHTY OAKS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCrystal Bridges-Museum of American Art Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBPRAPTORCENTER: $1,429 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTURTLE CREEK CONSERVANCY: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS ACADEMY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTURTLE CREEK ASSOCIATION: $800 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetOPERATION KINDNESS: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS IRISH FOUNDATION: $700 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetNORTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTERS FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDPAS ASSIST THE OFFICER FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDallas Holocaust and Human Rights Museum: $450 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOUR HOUSE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBe the Difference Foundation: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONNECTING POINT OF PARK CITIES: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF DALLAS INC DBA JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Woodall Rodgers Park Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Baylor Health Care System ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS ARCHITECTURE FORUM ↗
  • Who funds UPLIFT EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds FRONTLINE HEALING FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND ↗
  • Who funds Adaptive Training Foundation ↗
  • Who funds KERSHAW'S CHALLENGE ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds CARRY THE LOAD ↗
  • Who funds The Magic Yarn Project ↗
  • Who funds AMERICA'S WARRIOR PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds ELLEN NOEL ART MUSEUM OF THE PERMIAN BASIN ↗
  • Who funds THE BOOT CAMPAIGN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ARKANSAS CENTER FOR INDEPENDENCE ↗
  • Who funds Dallas Museum of Art ↗
  • Who funds 22KILL ↗
  • Who funds VETERAN OUTDOORS INC ↗
  • Who funds REBUILDING WARRIORS ↗
  • Who funds MIGHTY OAKS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Beyond The Burn Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX29.1× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The Dallas Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Chive Charities · Gil and Dody Weaver Foundation · Dallas Jewish Community Foundation · Veterans United Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · Enterprise Holdings Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Ward Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Ward Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Ward Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Ward Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 67 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ward Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph