Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Walter J Gatti Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$33k
Granted FY2020
10
Grants FY2020
2
States reached
$19k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

99% of The Walter J Gatti Foundation Inc’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Community Foundation For Brevard Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 2 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year The Walter J Gatti Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $33k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

8
’17
9
’18
9
’19
5
’20
4
’21
4
’22
2
’23
2
’24
2
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$5.5MHuman Services$619kPublic Safety & Disaster$164kAnimals$80kHealth$39kEducation$35kHousing & Shelter$10kYouth Development$6kOther$0
02FY2020 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k9 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $19k
$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$19,054
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF THE BAHAMAS RELIEF$6,500
HEALTH FIRST FOUNDATION$2,600
FLORIDA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$1,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF BREVARD INC$1,000
WOMEN'S CENTER$1,000
BREVARD COUNTY FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE$750
HIGH COUNTRY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$500
FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF POLICE$500
BANNER ELK VOLUNTEER FIRE RESCUE INC$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $616k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%VETERANS AIRLIFT COMMAND: $25k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $148k → 14%VETERANS AIRLIFT COMMAND: $24k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $143k → 14%VETERANS AIRLIFT COMMAND: $15k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $78k → 14%VETERANS AIRLIFT COMMAND: $11k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $53k → 14%VETERANS AIRLIFT COMMAND: $10k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $33k → 14%VETERANS AIRLIFT COMMAND: $10k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $19k → 14%VETERANS AIRLIFT COMMAND: $10k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $13k → 14%VETERANS AIRLIFT COMMAND: $1k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $13k → 14%WOMEN'S CENTER: $8k → 10%WOMEN'S CENTER: $2k → 10%WOMEN'S CENTER: $1k → 10%WOMENS CENTER OF BREVARD: $500 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
MN
IL
NY
NV
VA
MD
KS
NC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$915k · 17 repeat orgs$67k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +85% since the first grant, against +0% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2020, 8 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
21

Total granted

$915k
$43k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+85%
+0%

Still filing today

41%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationPublic Safety & DisasterPhilanthropyHealthHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $499k · revenue +90%
  • TA
    THE AOPA FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $150k · revenue +85%
  • TH
    The High Country Charitable Foundation
    6× · 2017–2022 · $17k · revenue +129%

Funded once

  • TW
    THE WINGS CLUB FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue -13%
  • AS
    AMERICAN STUDIES CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue +0%
  • WF
    WISHES FOR OUR HEROES
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
3
Air & Space Forces Association

The air & space forces association (afa) is a nonprofit, independent, professional military, and aerospace education association. the association's mission is to promote dominant u.s. air and space forces as the foundation of a strong…

Education
4
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
5
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
6
National Veterans Legal Services Program Inc

To provide at no cost legal assistance to veterans of the u.s. armed forces and current service members.

—
7
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
8
America's Newspapers

Providing research, education and practical information all aimed at optimizing newspapers' business operations, deepening their community engagement and enhancing the quality of their journalism.

Employment
9
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
10
American Foreign Service Association

American foreign service association (afsa) is both the principal advocate for the long-term institutional wellbeing of the professional career foreign service and responsible for safeguarding the interest of afsa members. (continued on…

—
11
Waterstep Inc

Waterstep focuses on providing safe water, sanitation, and hygiene solutions to communities in need around the world. its mission is rooted in the belief that safe water is a basic human right and a critical foundation for health,…

Youth Development
12
Security Council Report Inc

See schedule osecurity council report was established to provide timely, accurate, and objective information and analysis on the activities of the united nations security council. this information and analysis is provided for the benefit…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Jewish National Fund (Keren Kayemeth Leisrael) Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
14/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR BREVARD INC: $5,467,397 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR BREVARD INC+1 more: $17,353 · PhilanthropyWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $499,318 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WA…VETERANS AIRLIFT COMMAND: $105,581 · Human ServicesVETERANS A…+2 more: $11,600 · Human ServicesBREVARD ZOO: $79,304 · OtherHEALTH FIRST FOUNDATION: $32,100 · OtherNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF THE BAHAMAS RELIEF: $6,500 · Other+31 more: $37,444 · OtherTHE AOPA FOUNDATION INC: $150,000 · Public Safety & DisasterTHE WINGS CLUB FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · EducationAISC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · EducationFLORIDA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $3,000 · Education+1 more: $250 · EducationSerene Harbor Inc: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $1,000 · International
Philanthropy$5,484,750Human Services$616,499Other$155,348Public Safety & Disaster$150,000Education$33,250Housing & Shelter$10,000International$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $499,318 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE AOPA FOUNDATION INC: $150,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetVETERANS AIRLIFT COMMAND: $105,581 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetThe High Country Charitable Foundation: $17,353 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetSOUTH BREVARD WOMEN'S CENTER INC: $11,100 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSerene Harbor Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetAISC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFLORIDA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN STUDIES CENTER: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEVADA SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLeadership Institute: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWreaths Across America: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnited American Patriots Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE RESOURCES COUNCIL OF EAST FLORIDA INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR BREVARD INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AOPA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds VETERANS AIRLIFT COMMAND ↗
  • Who funds THE WINGS CLUB FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The High Country Charitable Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH BREVARD WOMEN'S CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Serene Harbor Inc ↗
  • Who funds AISC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN STUDIES CENTER ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds LINVILLE CENTRAL RESCUE SQUAD INC ↗
  • Who funds NEVADA SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds Leadership Institute ↗
  • Who funds RESCUE- FREEDOM INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds Wreaths Across America ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC6.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Walter J Gatti Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Walter J Gatti Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 31%
  • South Brevard Women's Center Inc: 45% of income from government
  • Serene Harbor Inc: 31% of income from government
  • Florida Institute of Technology Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Walter J Gatti Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Walter J Gatti Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Walter J Gatti’s filings →

More from the funding graph