Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Walter J Gatti Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$33k
Granted FY2020
10
Grants FY2020
2
States reached
$19k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

99% of The Walter J Gatti Foundation Inc’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Community Foundation For Brevard Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 2 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year The Walter J Gatti Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $33k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

8
17
9
18
9
19
5
20
4
21
4
22
2
23
2
24
2
25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Philanthropy$5.5MHuman Services$619kPublic Safety & Disaster$164kAnimals$80kHealth$39kEducation$35kHousing & Shelter$10kYouth Development$6kOther$0
02FY2020 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k9 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $19k
$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$19,054
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF THE BAHAMAS RELIEF$6,500
HEALTH FIRST FOUNDATION$2,600
JEWISH FEDERATION OF BREVARD INC$1,000
WOMEN'S CENTER$1,000
FLORIDA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$1,000
BREVARD COUNTY FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE$750
HIGH COUNTRY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$500
FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF POLICE$500
BANNER ELK VOLUNTEER FIRE RESCUE INC$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $616k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%VETERANS AIRLIFT COMMAND: $25k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $148k → 14%VETERANS AIRLIFT COMMAND: $24k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $143k → 14%VETERANS AIRLIFT COMMAND: $15k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $78k → 14%VETERANS AIRLIFT COMMAND: $11k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $53k → 14%VETERANS AIRLIFT COMMAND: $10k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $33k → 14%VETERANS AIRLIFT COMMAND: $10k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $19k → 14%VETERANS AIRLIFT COMMAND: $10k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $13k → 14%VETERANS AIRLIFT COMMAND: $1k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $13k → 14%WOMEN'S CENTER: $8k → 10%WOMEN'S CENTER: $2k → 10%WOMEN'S CENTER: $1k → 10%WOMENS CENTER OF BREVARD: $500 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
WA
MN
IL
NY
NV
VA
MD
KS
NC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$915k · 17 repeat orgs$67k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +70% since the first grant, against -13% for the ones you funded once.

17 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2020, 8 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
21

Total granted

$915k
$43k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+70%
-13%

Still filing today

41%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationPublic Safety & DisasterPhilanthropyHealthHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $499k · revenue +70%
  • TA
    THE AOPA FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $150k · revenue +85%
  • TH
    The High Country Charitable Foundation
    6× · 2017–2022 · $17k · revenue +129%

Funded once

  • TW
    THE WINGS CLUB FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue -13%
  • AS
    AMERICAN STUDIES CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue -21%
  • WF
    WISHES FOR OUR HEROES
    one grant, 2017 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

3
Air & Space Forces Association

The air & space forces association (afa) is a nonprofit, independent, professional military, and aerospace education association. the association's mission is to promote dominant u.s. air and space forces as the foundation of a strong…

Education
4
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
5
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
6
National Veterans Legal Services Program Inc

To provide at no cost legal assistance to veterans of the u.s. armed forces and current service members.

7
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
8
America's Newspapers

Providing research, education and practical information all aimed at optimizing newspapers' business operations, deepening their community engagement and enhancing the quality of their journalism.

Employment
9
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
10
American Foreign Service Association

American foreign service association (afsa) is both the principal advocate for the long-term institutional wellbeing of the professional career foreign service and responsible for safeguarding the interest of afsa members. (continued on…

11
Waterstep Inc

Waterstep focuses on providing safe water, sanitation, and hygiene solutions to communities in need around the world. its mission is rooted in the belief that safe water is a basic human right and a critical foundation for health,…

Youth Development
12
Security Council Report Inc

See schedule osecurity council report was established to provide timely, accurate, and objective information and analysis on the activities of the united nations security council. this information and analysis is provided for the benefit…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is Jewish National Fund (Keren Kayemeth Leisrael) Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR BREVARD INC — $5,467,397 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR BREVARD INC+1 more — $17,353 · PhilanthropyWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $499,318 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WA…VETERANS AIRLIFT COMMAND — $105,581 · Human ServicesVETERANS A…+2 more — $11,600 · Human ServicesBREVARD ZOO — $79,304 · OtherHEALTH FIRST FOUNDATION — $32,100 · OtherNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF THE BAHAMAS RELIEF — $6,500 · Other+31 more — $37,444 · OtherTHE AOPA FOUNDATION INC — $150,000 · Public Safety & DisasterTHE WINGS CLUB FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 · EducationAISC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · EducationFLORIDA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC — $3,000 · Education+1 more — $250 · EducationSerene Harbor Inc — $10,000 · Housing & ShelterJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $1,000 · International
Philanthropy$5,484,750Human Services$616,499Other$155,348Public Safety & Disaster$150,000Education$33,250Housing & Shelter$10,000International$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $499,318 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE AOPA FOUNDATION INC — $150,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetVETERANS AIRLIFT COMMAND — $105,581 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetThe High Country Charitable Foundation — $17,353 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetSOUTH BREVARD WOMEN'S CENTER INC — $11,100 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSerene Harbor Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetAISC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFLORIDA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN STUDIES CENTER — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEVADA SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLeadership Institute — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWreaths Across America — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnited American Patriots Inc — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE RESOURCES COUNCIL OF EAST FLORIDA INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR BREVARD INC
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
  • Who funds THE AOPA FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds VETERANS AIRLIFT COMMAND
  • Who funds THE WINGS CLUB FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds The High Country Charitable Foundation
  • Who funds SOUTH BREVARD WOMEN'S CENTER INC
  • Who funds Serene Harbor Inc
  • Who funds AISC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds FLORIDA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN STUDIES CENTER
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC
  • Who funds LINVILLE CENTRAL RESCUE SQUAD INC
  • Who funds NEVADA SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
  • Who funds Leadership Institute
  • Who funds RESCUE- FREEDOM INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds Wreaths Across America

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC6.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Walter J Gatti Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 31%
  • South Brevard Women's Center Inc45% of income from government
  • Serene Harbor Inc31% of income from government
  • Florida Institute of Technology Inc5% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Walter J Gatti Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Walter J Gatti Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph