Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Walker Family Foundation Blair Nichols - Trustee

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$25k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$47kHousing & Shelter$41kHealth$34kCivil Rights$26kArts & Culture$15kYouth Development$15kEducation$10kInternational$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$431k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALL SAINTS CHURCH$15,000
Orlando Jazz Collective Inc$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $43k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER ORLANDO: $22k → 13%HELPLINE HOUSE: $3k → 10%FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER ORLANDO: $11k → 13%FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER ORLANDO: $8k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
NY
MA
PA
CA
KY
DC
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$130k · 5 repeat orgs$77k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
13

Total granted

$130k
$67k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+80%

Still filing today

80%
77%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalCivil RightsEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FP
    FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER ORLANDO INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $41k · revenue +66%
  • TB
    THE BRIDGE TO RECOVERY INC
    4× · 2017–2021 · $32k · revenue +56%
  • ISLANDWOOD
    2× · 2017–2018 · $5k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • THE LOVELAND FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $22k · revenue ×11
  • TT
    Teen Talking Circles
    one grant, 2017 · $7k · revenue +10%
  • TR
    THE RENFREW FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $6k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Belong Partners

BELONG Partners is an education equity nonprofit that believes in a future where everyone has the opportunity to thrive because they know they matter and belong. We partner with schools and organizations to build equitable communities…

Youth Development
2
Techbridge Inc

Techbridge breaks the cycle of generational poverty through the innovative use of technology to transform nonprofit and community impact. techbridge's work is focused on four pillars: hunger relief, homeless support, social justice and…

Philanthropy
3
Partnersglobal

Partnersglobal (partners) works through a global network to support local leaders and create partnerships that transform conflict, strengthen democratic institutions, and achieve sustainable development.

International
4
Partnership On Ai to Benefit People and Society

Bringing diverse voices together across global sectors, disciplines, and demographics so developments in ai advance positive outcomes for people and society.

Science & Tech
5
Transformca dba Transform

Transform works to ensure that people of all incomes thrive in a world safe from climate chaos.

Community Improvement
6
Out & Equal

To provide leadership and professional development, education and research to create workplaces free from discrimination.

Social Science
7
Wayside House Inc

Our mission is to break the cycle of addiction and trauma for women, children, and families.

8
Asylee Women Enterprise Inc

Asylee Women Enterprise (AWE), journeys with asylum seekers and other forced migrants as they navigate the immigration legal process, begin to heal from past trauma, and rebuild their lives in Baltimore.

International
9
International Budget Partnership

Ibp works with civil society, governments, international institutions and the private sector to bring about a world in which empowered citizens participate in open, inclusive public budgeting processes to shape policies and practices that…

International
10
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

11
Youthbuild Global Inc

With love and respect, we partner with opportunity youth to build the skillsets and mindsets that lead to lifelong learning, livelihood, and leadership. youthbuild strives to create a world where all young people are seen for their…

Employment
12
Springboard Collaborative

Springboard collaborative combines targeted student instruction with parent training in an incentivized system that closes the literacy gap, by transferring the summer from a barrier into a springboard for financially disadvantaged…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Thousand Currents and the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ALL SAINTS CHURCH — $45,000 · OtherALL SAINTS CHURCHTHE BRIDGE TO RECOVERY INC — $31,865 · OtherTHE BRIDGE TO RECOVERY INCORLANDO JAZZ COLLECTIVE — $10,000 · OtherORLANDO JAZZ COLLECTIVETHE RENFREW FOUNDATION — $5,635 · OtherTHE RENFREW FOUNDATIONBAINBRIDGE PERFORMING ARTS — $5,000 · Other+3 more — $7,365 · Other+3 moreFAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER ORLANDO INC — $40,750 · Human ServicesFAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER O…Teen Talking Circles — $7,100 · Human ServicesTeen Talking CirclesHELPLINE HOUSE — $2,500 · Human ServicesTHE LOVELAND FOUNDATION INC — $22,100 · Civil RightsTHE LOVELAND F…ADVOCATES FOR TRANS EQUALITY EDUCATION FUND — $3,550 · Civil RightsADVOCATES FOR …International Rescue Committee INC — $5,000 · InternationalTHOUSAND CURRENTS — $3,550 · InternationalSPURS OF HOPE INC — $7,500 · Youth DevelopmentISLANDWOOD — $4,865 · EnvironmentPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $2,500 · HealthTHE SEATTLE SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY & PSYCHOLOGY — $2,500 · Education
Other$104,865Human Services$50,350Civil Rights$25,650International$8,550Youth Development$7,500Environment$4,865Health$2,500Education$2,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER ORLANDO INC — $40,750 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetTHE BRIDGE TO RECOVERY INC — $31,865 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetSPURS OF HOPE INC — $7,500 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISLANDWOOD — $4,865 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHOUSAND CURRENTS — $3,550 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetADVOCATES FOR TRANS EQUALITY EDUCATION FUND — $3,550 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY YEAR INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SEATTLE SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY & PSYCHOLOGY — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHELPLINE HOUSE — $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

One Call for AllWA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: One Call for All · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Walker Family Foundation Blair Nichols - Trustee funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 11%
  • City Year Inc11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph