Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Wadhams Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$710k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$2.7MEducation$654kArts & Culture$509kRecreation & Sports$307kEnvironment$301kHuman Services$268kPhilanthropy$166kHousing & Shelter$165kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $138k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $150k
  • $250k+1 grant · $710k
$17,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$710,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
ANN ARBOR ART CENTER$50,000
CHAD TOUGH CORNERSTONE CLUB$50,000
STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOC$35,000
ANN ARBOR A'S BASEBALL$20,000
ANN ARBOR PIONEER HS BOOSTER CLUB$20,000
SHELTER ASSOC WASHTENAW CTY$17,500
MICHIGAN LEAGUE CONSERVATION VOTERS$15,000
GARRETT'S SPACE$15,000
RAY & MARY KNIGHT FOUNDATION$15,000
FISHER HOUSE$5,000
PIONEER HIGH SCHOOL - HALL OF FAME$5,000
THERAPEUTIC RIDING$2,500
HURON RIVER WATER SHED COUNCIL$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $199k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MICHIGAN ABILITY PARTNERS: $10k → 14%CHAD TOUGH: $25k → 14%CHAD TOUGH FOUNDATION: $14k → 14%OZONE HOUSE: $50k → 14%ARBOR HOSPICE: $100k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.8M · 22 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +121% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
42

Total granted

$3.8M
$1.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+121%
+9%

Still filing today

45%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentAnimalsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of Michigan
    4× · 2017–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +202% · 94% of their budget
  • AA
    Ann Arbor Art Association
    4× · 2020–2024 · $250k · revenue +122%
  • TS
    THE STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $108k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • UO
    U OF M ALUMNI ASSOC
    one grant, 2017 · $252k
  • AA
    ANN ARBOR A'S TRAVEL BASEBALL
    one grant, 2021 · $200k
  • AMERICAN UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2021 · $200k · revenue +20%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Michigan Enviromental Council

Informing and educating the public and decision makers about environmental issues.

Environment
2
Business Leaders for Michigan

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

—
3
Land Conservancy of West Michigan

Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…

Environment
4
Business Leaders for Michigan Foundation

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

Community Improvement
5
Alumni Association of the University of Michigan

The Association is an independent worldwide organization that nurtures lifelong relationships with and among current and future Michigan alumni. As a committed partner of the University the Association offers programs of relevance and…

Education
6
Michigan Water Environment Association

Be and create stewards for the water environment of michigan. provide high quality education for michigan's water professionals. educate and inform policy makers and the general public. promote scientifically sound environmental practices…

Environment
7
Michigan Chamber of Commerce

To promote conditions favorable to job creation and business success in michigan.

—
8
Michigan Pharmacists Association

To encourage and support its members as professionals responsible for the delivery of patient-focused care.

—
9
Michigan Assoc of Community Mental Health Boards

Assisting the community mental health boards of michigan in developing methods for mental health planning, care and treatment.

—
10
Detroit Historical Society

The Detroit Historical Society tells Detroit's stories and why they matter through its exhibits, programs, outreach, and the preservation and dissemination of its artifacts and collections.

Arts & Culture
11
Michigan Legacy Art Park

Inspire awareness, appreciation and passion for michigan's history and stories, culture and environment through the arts.

Arts & Culture
12
Michigan Science Center

The mission of the michigan science center is to inspire curious minds of all ages to discover, explore and appreciate science, technology, engineering and math in a creative, dynamic learning environment.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ozone House Inc; the most unlike its peers is St Louis Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
20/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

University of Michigan: $2,040,000 · OtherUniversity of MichiganVETERAN'S CONNECTED - FREEDOM RIVER: $260,000 · OtherVETERAN'S CONNECTED - FREEDOM RIVERU OF M ALUMNI ASSOC: $252,017 · OtherU OF M ALUMNI ASSOCSTATE & MI THEATER CAMPAIGN: $220,000 · OtherANN ARBOR A'S TRAVEL BASEBALL: $200,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $200,000 · OtherUNITED WAY: $150,000 · Other+47 more: $1,089,670 · Other+47 moreAnn Arbor Art Association: $250,000 · Arts & CultureMICHIGAN THEATER FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $1,500 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $200,000 · EducationANN ARBOR PIONEER BOOSTER CLUB: $30,000 · EducationArbor Hospice Inc: $100,000 · Human ServicesOZONE HOUSE INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesCHADTOUGH DEFEAT DIPG FOUNDATION: $39,000 · Human ServicesMICHIGAN ABILITY PARTNERS: $10,000 · Human ServicesELE'S PLACE INC: $45,239 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS GROUP: $45,000 · Youth DevelopmentHURON RIVER WATERSHED COUNCIL: $48,000 · EnvironmentMICHIGAN LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS INC: $15,000 · EnvironmentNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $40,000 · AnimalsAMARA CONSERVATION: $10,000 · Animals
Other$4,411,687Arts & Culture$261,500Education$230,000Human Services$199,000Youth Development$90,239Environment$63,000Animals$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Michigan: $2,040,000 over 4y, 94% of budgetAnn Arbor Art Association: $250,000 over 4y, 6.6% of budgetAMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $200,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC: $107,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetArbor Hospice Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetOZONE HOUSE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetHURON RIVER WATERSHED COUNCIL: $48,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetELE'S PLACE INC: $45,239 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetGIRLS GROUP: $45,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHADTOUGH DEFEAT DIPG FOUNDATION: $39,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetANN ARBOR PIONEER BOOSTER CLUB: $30,000 over 2y, 6.7% of budgetPackard Health Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMICHIGAN LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGARRETT'S SPACE: $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTherapeutic Riding Inc: $15,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetTHE GENEROSITY PROJECT CORP: $15,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetMICHIGAN THEATER FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMICHIGAN ABILITY PARTNERS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMACKINAC CENTER: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFriends In Deed: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCreative Washtenaw: $1,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds Ann Arbor Art Association ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Arbor Hospice Inc ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds OZONE HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds HURON RIVER WATERSHED COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds ELE'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS GROUP ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION ↗
  • Who funds CHADTOUGH DEFEAT DIPG FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ANN ARBOR PIONEER BOOSTER CLUB ↗
  • Who funds Packard Health Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds MICHIGAN LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds GARRETT'S SPACE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ann Arbor Area Community FoundationMI38.6× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ann Arbor Area Community Foundation · James a and Faith Knight Foundation · United Way of Washtenaw County · Harry a and Margaret D Towsley Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Herrick Foundation · Speckhard-Knight Charitable Foundation · THE MOSAIC FOUNDATION (Of R & P Heydon) · Thrift Shop Association of Ann Arbor · Edward F Redies Foundation Inc · The Buhr Foundation · DTE Energy Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Wadhams Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Wadhams Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Wadhams Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Wadhams Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 69 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wadhams Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph