· Private foundation
Edward F Redies Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k14 grants · $67k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $194k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES | $30,000 |
| SALINE AREA SOCIAL SERVICES | $25,000 |
| WORK & PLAY SPECIAL NEEDS RESOURCE CENTER | $20,000 |
| REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN | $20,000 |
| ARBOR HOSPICE | $20,000 |
| REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN | $20,000 |
| SHELTER ASSOCIATION OF WASHTENAW COUNTY | $15,000 |
| MOTHERLY INTERCESSION | $12,000 |
| OAKLAND CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS | $12,000 |
| CHILDREN'S HEALING CENTER | $10,000 |
| SALINE AREA SCHOOLS | $10,000 |
| EVANGELICAL HOMES OF MICHIGAN | $7,000 |
| CHILDREN'S LITERACY NETWORK | $6,000 |
| WASHTENAW COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| SALINE AREA SCHOOLS | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $264k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
50 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 36 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $89k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AHArbor Hospice Inc8× · 2017–2024 · $121k · revenue +23%
- SASHELTER ASSOCIATION OF WASHTENAW COUNTY6× · 2017–2024 · $46k · revenue +149%
STUDENT ADVOCACY CENTER OF MICHIGAN INC7× · 2018–2024 · $28k · revenue +29%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $50k
- SRSALINE REC CENTERone grant, 2021 · $50k
EASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $12k · revenue +4%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To ensure all michigan children and youth with emotional, behavioral, or mental health challenges and their families live in a safe, welcoming community with access to needed services and supports.
Mid michigan community action guides local residents on the path to self-sufficiency through empowerment, education and community enrichment.
Assisting the community mental health boards of michigan in developing methods for mental health planning, care and treatment.
The michigan christian home dba beacon hill at eastgate, a not-for-profit corporation, provides housing and health services in a christian environment for older adults, thus enabling them to meet their ongoing physical, social and…
Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County D/B/A Catholic Charities Washtenaw County provides diverse, holistic social services including adoption and pregnancy counseling, food and basic needs assistance, domestic and child abuse…
Education of young people in the Montessori method
To assist people with low or moderate income to obtain safe and affordable housing
Through internal expertise, external partnerships, and advocacy, the area agency on aging of western michigan provides older adults, adults with disabilities, and their caregivers equitable access to services that promote independence and…
To provide comprehensive outpatient mental health services to over 5400 individuals and their families in a consumer driven person centered delivery system. Approximately 15% of our staff members are our clients who are involved in a…
Provide free legal assistance to indigent and low income persons
To provide high quality community-oriented, patient-centered health services for all.
Michigan Family Resources mission is to deliver holistic family-centered services to children that promote their well-being and development.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ozone House Inc and the most unlike its peers is Many Hands Lifesharing Community. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 72 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SALINE AREA SOCIAL SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds Arbor Hospice Inc ↗
- Who funds EVANGELICAL HOMES OF MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds SHELTER ASSOCIATION OF WASHTENAW COUNTY ↗
- Who funds ST LOUIS CENTER ↗
- Who funds STUDENT ADVOCACY CENTER OF MICHIGAN INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED METHODIST RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds GOLF ASSOC OF MICH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALING CENTER ↗
- Who funds CORNER HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds CHILDRENS LITERACY NETWORK ↗
- Who funds WASHTENAW COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OZONE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE MEDICAL CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK ↗
- Who funds EASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OAKLAND CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Ann Arbor Area Community Foundation · Harry a and Margaret D Towsley Foundation · United Way of Washtenaw County · James a and Faith Knight Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Kiwanis Club of Ann Arbor Foundation Inc · Dte Energy Foundation · The Buhr Foundation · Speckhard-Knight Charitable Foundation · The Martin Family Foundation · Food Gatherers · United Way for Southeastern Michigan
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Edward F Redies Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Edward F Redies Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Edward F Redies Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.