Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Wade Family Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$421k
Granted FY2021
14
Grants FY2021
5
States reached
$125k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

62% of The Wade Family Foundation’s FY2022 grant dollars went to University Of Notre Dame Du Lac, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2022 names 4 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year The Wade Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 7 organizations, $421k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

11
’17
6
’19
7
’20
7
’21
4
’22

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Recreation & Sports$1.3MEducation$1.1MScience & Tech$160kHealth$146kReligion$53kHuman Services$43kCommunity Improvement$40kYouth Development$10kOther$0
02FY2021 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k5 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $128k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $275k
$20,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$9.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC$125,000
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME$100,000
CORNELL$50,000
MUSEUM OF SCIENCE$25,000
BELMONT HILL SCHOOL ANNUAL$25,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
BRIGHAM & WOMEN'S HOSPITAL$20,000
ALZHIEMER ASSOC$13,200
FAIRFIELD UNIVERSITY$5,000
HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL$5,000
ST ROCK HAITI FOUNDATION$5,000
BELMONT DAY SCHOOL$2,150
FENWICK IMPROVEMENT FUND$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $90k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 28% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%EXCEPTIONAL LIVES: $40k → 7%EXCEPTIONAL LIVES: $25k → 7%UNITED SOUTH END SETTLEMENTS: $15k → 16%UNITED SOUTH END SETTLEMENTS: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 21 repeat orgs$381k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2021, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call). Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
6

Total granted

$1.6M
$75k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
+215%

Still filing today

43%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $300k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22
EducationHealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    CATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $518k · revenue +67%
  • EL
    EXCEPTIONAL LIVES INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $65k · revenue +34%
  • Fairfield University
    2× · 2017–2021 · $55k · revenue +63%

Funded once

  • GF
    GREENLIGHT FUND INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $40k · revenue +215%
  • DM
    DECORDOVA MUSEUM
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • BB
    BIG BROTHERSBIG SISTERS OF MA
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Trustees of Boston College

Mission strengthened by more than a century and a half of dedication to academic excellence, boston college commits itself to the highest standards of teaching and research in undergraduate, graduate and professional programs and to the…

Education
2
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
Bentley University

Organization's mission bentley university believes good business can impact more than the bottom line - it can change the world. bentley is a community of future business leaders who will deliver value in the marketplace and lasting…

Education
5
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

—
6
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
7
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
8
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
9
Northeastern University
Education
10
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
11
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
12
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Belmont Day School Inc; the most unlike its peers is Fenwick Improvement Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
12/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

University of Notre Dame du Lac: $1,288,626 · EducationUniversity of Notre Dame du LacCATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $517,800 · EducationCATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC+3 more: $121,400 · Education+3 moreIndividual grant recipient: $250,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBELMONT HILL SCHOOL ANNUAL: $244,700 · OtherBELMONT HILL SCHOOL ANNUALIndividual grant recipient: $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCORNELL: $55,000 · OtherCORNELLST MARY'S: $52,500 · OtherST MARY'SLAWRENCE CATHOLIC ACADEMY OF LAWRENCE MASSACHUSETTS INC: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $40,000 · OtherHARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL: $35,000 · Other+9 more: $86,700 · Other+9 moreMUSEUM OF SCIENCE: $160,000 · Arts & CultureEXCEPTIONAL LIVES INC: $65,000 · Human ServicesUNITED SOUTH END SETTLEMENTS: $25,000 · Human ServicesChildren's Hospital Corporation: $21,200 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $20,000 · HealthSt Rock Haiti Foundation LTD: $5,000 · HealthGREENLIGHT FUND INC: $40,000 · Community ImprovementTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS: $2,500 · EnvironmentFENWICK IMPROVEMENT FUND INC: $1,000 · Philanthropy
Education$1,927,826Other$963,900Arts & Culture$160,000Human Services$90,000Health$46,200Community Improvement$40,000Environment$2,500Philanthropy$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $1,288,626 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $517,800 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetMUSEUM OF SCIENCE: $160,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetEXCEPTIONAL LIVES INC: $65,000 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetFairfield University: $55,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREENLIGHT FUND INC: $40,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBEACON ACADEMY INC: $39,750 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetBELMONT DAY SCHOOL INC: $26,650 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED SOUTH END SETTLEMENTS: $25,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $21,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSt Rock Haiti Foundation LTD: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFENWICK IMPROVEMENT FUND INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF SCIENCE ↗
  • Who funds EXCEPTIONAL LIVES INC ↗
  • Who funds Fairfield University ↗
  • Who funds GREENLIGHT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds BEACON ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds BELMONT DAY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED SOUTH END SETTLEMENTS ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds St Rock Haiti Foundation LTD ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS ↗
  • Who funds FENWICK IMPROVEMENT FUND INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc)MA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Eastern Bank Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Wade Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Wade Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Reservations: 2% of income from government
  • Beacon Academy Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Fairfield University: 1% of income from government
  • Museum of Science: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Wade Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Wade Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Wade Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph