Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Wade Family Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$421k
Granted FY2021
14
Grants FY2021
5
States reached
$125k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

62% of The Wade Family Foundation’s FY2022 grant dollars went to University Of Notre Dame Du Lac, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2022 names 4 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year The Wade Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 7 organizations, $421k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

11
17
6
19
7
20
7
21
4
22

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0185% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172022.

Recreation & Sports$1.3MEducation$1.1MScience & Tech$160kHealth$146kReligion$53kHuman Services$43kCommunity Improvement$40kYouth Development$10kOther$0
02FY2021 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k5 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $128k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $275k
$20,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$9.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC$125,000
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME$100,000
CORNELL$50,000
MUSEUM OF SCIENCE$25,000
BELMONT HILL SCHOOL ANNUAL$25,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
BRIGHAM & WOMEN'S HOSPITAL$20,000
ALZHIEMER ASSOC$13,200
ST ROCK HAITI FOUNDATION$5,000
FAIRFIELD UNIVERSITY$5,000
HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL$5,000
BELMONT DAY SCHOOL$2,150
FENWICK IMPROVEMENT FUND$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $90k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 28% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%EXCEPTIONAL LIVES: $40k → 7%EXCEPTIONAL LIVES: $25k → 7%UNITED SOUTH END SETTLEMENTS: $15k → 16%UNITED SOUTH END SETTLEMENTS: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.6M · 21 repeat orgs$381k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2021, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call). Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
6

Total granted

$1.6M
$75k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
+215%

Still filing today

43%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $300k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22
EducationHealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    CATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $518k · revenue +67%
  • EL
    EXCEPTIONAL LIVES INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $65k · revenue +34%
  • Fairfield University
    2× · 2017–2021 · $55k · revenue +63%

Funded once

  • GF
    GREENLIGHT FUND INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $40k · revenue +215%
  • DM
    DECORDOVA MUSEUM
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • BB
    BIG BROTHERSBIG SISTERS OF MA
    one grant, 2017 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Trustees of Boston College

Mission strengthened by more than a century and a half of dedication to academic excellence, boston college commits itself to the highest standards of teaching and research in undergraduate, graduate and professional programs and to the…

Education
2
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
Bentley University

Organization's mission bentley university believes good business can impact more than the bottom line - it can change the world. bentley is a community of future business leaders who will deliver value in the marketplace and lasting…

Education
5
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

6
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
7
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

8
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
9
Northeastern University
Education
10
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
11
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
12
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Belmont Day School Inc and the most unlike its peers is Fenwick Improvement Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
12/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

University of Notre Dame du Lac — $1,288,626 · EducationUniversity of Notre Dame du LacCATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC — $517,800 · EducationCATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC+3 more — $121,400 · Education+3 moreIndividual grant recipient — $250,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBELMONT HILL SCHOOL ANNUAL — $244,700 · OtherBELMONT HILL SCHOOL ANNUALIndividual grant recipient — $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCORNELL — $55,000 · OtherCORNELLST MARY'S — $52,500 · OtherST MARY'SIndividual grant recipient — $50,000 · OtherLAWRENCE CATHOLIC ACADEMY OF LAWRENCE MASSACHUSETTS INC — $50,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED — $40,000 · OtherHARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL — $35,000 · Other+9 more — $86,700 · Other+9 moreMUSEUM OF SCIENCE — $160,000 · Arts & CultureEXCEPTIONAL LIVES INC — $65,000 · Human ServicesUNITED SOUTH END SETTLEMENTS — $25,000 · Human ServicesChildren's Hospital Corporation — $21,200 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $20,000 · HealthSt Rock Haiti Foundation LTD — $5,000 · HealthGREENLIGHT FUND INC — $40,000 · Community ImprovementTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS — $2,500 · EnvironmentFENWICK IMPROVEMENT FUND INC — $1,000 · Philanthropy
Education$1,927,826Other$963,900Arts & Culture$160,000Human Services$90,000Health$46,200Community Improvement$40,000Environment$2,500Philanthropy$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac — $1,288,626 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC — $517,800 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetMUSEUM OF SCIENCE — $160,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetEXCEPTIONAL LIVES INC — $65,000 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetFairfield University — $55,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREENLIGHT FUND INC — $40,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBEACON ACADEMY INC — $39,750 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetBELMONT DAY SCHOOL INC — $26,650 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED SOUTH END SETTLEMENTS — $25,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation — $21,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSt Rock Haiti Foundation LTD — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFENWICK IMPROVEMENT FUND INC — $1,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac
  • Who funds CATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF SCIENCE
  • Who funds EXCEPTIONAL LIVES INC
  • Who funds Fairfield University
  • Who funds GREENLIGHT FUND INC
  • Who funds BEACON ACADEMY INC
  • Who funds BELMONT DAY SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds UNITED SOUTH END SETTLEMENTS
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D
  • Who funds St Rock Haiti Foundation LTD
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS
  • Who funds FENWICK IMPROVEMENT FUND INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc)MA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Eastern Bank Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Wade Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 60%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Children's Hospital Corporation10% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Reservations2% of income from government
  • Beacon Academy Inc1% of income from government
  • Fairfield University1% of income from government
  • Museum of Science0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Wade Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Wade Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph