Skip to content

· Private foundation

The W J Silverstein Family Trust Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$680k
Granted FY2023
9
Grants FY2023
7
States reached
$300k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of The W J Silverstein Family Trust Inc’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Bank Of America Charitable Gift Fd, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year The W J Silverstein Family Trust Inc named its own grantees at scale: 9 organizations, $680k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

7
’18
7
’19
4
’20
7
’21
8
’22
9
’23
1
’24
0
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Philanthropy$1.0MRecreation & Sports$916kHuman Services$660kInternational$530kEnvironment$480kYouth Development$350kReligion$145kCommunity Improvement$120kOther$0
02FY2023 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $360k
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$50,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$6.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
US SOCCER FEDERATION FOUNDATION INC$300,000
NEGOTIATION STRATEGIES INSTITUTE$120,000
OLD-GROWTH FOREST NETWORK INC$80,000
KNOW AGENDA FOUNDATION$60,000
PEACE FIRST INC$50,000
GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC$50,000
INWARD BOUND MINDFULNESS EDUCATION INC$10,000
SMOOOTH INC$5,000
ADIRONDACK ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE INC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $245k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 27% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%INWARD BOUND MINDFULNESS EDUCATION: $40k → 8%GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $50k → 8%SMOOOTH INC: $5k → 15%INWARD BOUND MINDFULNESS EDUCATION INC: $30k → 8%GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $20k → 8%INWARD BOUND MINDFULNESS EDUCATION INC: $30k → 8%MAMA HOPE INC: $60k → 17%INWARD BOUND MINDFULNESS EDUCATION INC: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.2M · 11 repeat orgs$140k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
2

Total granted

$3.2M
$135k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-24%
+156%

Still filing today

91%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationRecreation & SportsInternationalEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NS
    NEGOTIATION STRATEGIES INSTITUTE
    5× · 2018–2023 · $530k · revenue +130%
  • OF
    OLD-GROWTH FOREST NETWORK INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $480k · revenue +215% · 36% of their budget
  • SJ
    SOLUTIONS JOURNALISM NETWORK INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $100k · revenue +74%

Funded once

  • PEACE IN SCHOOLSgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $115k · revenue +156%
  • PP
    Pixie Project Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +30%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Forest Generation

Global Forest Generation restores and protects forest ecosystems in partnership with grassroots leaders and local communities across vast landscapes which play a critical role in preserving water, protecting biodiversity, storing carbon,…

Environment
2
Global Impact Investing Network Inc

The global impact investing network, inc. is dedicated to increasing the scale and effectiveness of impact investing to solve systemic problems facing people and the planet. impact investments are investments made into companies,…

Philanthropy
3
Foodshot Global Inc

Accelerate the transformation to a healthy, sustainable and equitable food system.

Food & Nutrition
4
International Peace Institute Inc

The international peace institute (ipi) bridges policy and real-world diplomacy, advising global leaders and shaping innovative policy solutions across the multilateral system, governments, and beyond through independent research and…

International
5
Environment Next Inc

Environment next supports individuals, nonprofits and businesses around the world on solutions to complex climate issues. we provide leadership, outreach and communication support, grants, and investments to empower leaders and their ideas…

Environment
6
Development Gateway Inc

Development gateway (dg) creates tools and design processes that help collect, visualize, and use data for a more equitable world. for 20 years, we have built systems, dashboards, and tools to create more effective, open, and engaging…

International
7
Climate Breakthrough Inc

To launch breakthrough climate mitigation efforts by identifying, supporting, and unleashing innovative leaders with transformative strategies.

Human Services
8
Pyxera Global Inc

To reinvent how public, private and social interests converge to address global challenges.

International
9
Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft

The quincy institute promotes ideas that move u.s. foreign policy away from endless war and toward vigorous diplomacy in the pursuit of international peace. qi's staff and non-resident experts expose the costs and consequences of…

Community Improvement
10
Legal Advocates for Safe Science and Technology Inc

Using legal advocacy to make advances in science and technology safer for people and the planet.

Science & Tech
11
Sdsn Association Inc

The SDSN Association works to mobilize the world's universities for action on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the Paris Agreement; empower societies through free online education; and translate scientific evidence and ideas…

Human Services
12
Center for International Policy Inc

The center for international policy is a woman-led, progressive, independent nonprofit center for research, education, and advocacy working to advance a more peaceful, just, and sustainable u.s. approach to foreign policy. through…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Peace First Inc; the most unlike its peers is S M O O O T H Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
7/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FD: $1,000,000 · PhilanthropyBANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE…UNITED STATES SOCCER FOUNDATION INC: $916,000 · Recreation & SportsUNITED STATES SOCCER FO…MAMA HOPE INC: $360,000 · Human ServicesMAMA HOPE INCPEACE IN SCHOOLS: $115,000 · Human ServicesPEACE IN SCHOOLSINWARD BOUND MINDFULNESS EDUCATION INC: $110,000 · Human ServicesINWARD BOUND MIND…GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $70,000 · Human ServicesGUIDE DOGS FOR TH…+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesNEGOTIATION STRATEGIES INSTITUTE: $530,000 · InternationalNEGOTIATION S…OLD-GROWTH FOREST NETWORK INC: $480,000 · EnvironmentOLD-GROWTH F…PEACE FIRST INC: $350,000 · Youth DevelopmentPEACE FIR…Know Agenda Foundation: $120,000 · EducationSOLUTIONS JOURNALISM NETWORK INC: $100,000 · EducationNORTHWEST ZEN SANGHA: $145,450 · OtherADIRONDACK ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE INC: $26,869 · OtherPixie Project Inc: $20,000 · Other
Philanthropy$1,000,000Recreation & Sports$916,000Human Services$660,000International$530,000Environment$480,000Youth Development$350,000Education$220,000Other$192,319

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED STATES SOCCER FOUNDATION INC: $916,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetNEGOTIATION STRATEGIES INSTITUTE: $530,000 over 5y, 21% of budgetOLD-GROWTH FOREST NETWORK INC: $480,000 over 6y, 36% of budgetMAMA HOPE INC: $360,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetPEACE FIRST INC: $350,000 over 5y, 7.4% of budgetKnow Agenda Foundation: $120,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetPEACE IN SCHOOLS: $115,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetINWARD BOUND MINDFULNESS EDUCATION INC: $110,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetSOLUTIONS JOURNALISM NETWORK INC: $100,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $70,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetADIRONDACK ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE INC: $26,869 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetPixie Project Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetS M O O O T H INC: $5,000 over 1y, 11% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR14.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The W J Silverstein Family Trust Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The W J Silverstein Family Trust Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    6get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The W J Silverstein Family Trust Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The W J Silverstein Family Trust Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on W J Silverstein Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph