Skip to content

· Private foundation

The W & R Bernheimer Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$58k
Granted FY2025still arriving
38
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$86kPhilanthropy$52kEducation$33kHuman Services$23kHealth$17kEnvironment$15kAnimals$14kFood & Nutrition$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k37 grants · $48k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARK MORRIS DANCE GROUP$10,000
BUTTONWOOD PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY$6,000
INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC ARCHITECTURE$5,500
WILLIAMS COLLEGE$5,500
ARCHITECTURAL LEAGUE OF NY$3,500
CENTER FOR BIODIVERSITY$2,000
MAEDAY RESCUE$2,000
FRESHMAN FRESH START$1,575
SISTER JOSE WOMEN'S CENTER$1,500
KCRW$1,500
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$1,500
EMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUS$1,300
WOMEN'S LUNCH PLACE$1,100
ST LOUIS CANCER AWARENESS$1,000
OUR BIG KITCHEN LOS ANGELES$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 31% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NEWTON AT HOME: $1k → 8%NEWTON AT HOME: $1k → 8%FRESHMAN FRESH START: $2k → 7%EMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUS: $1k → 15%FRESHMAN FRESH START: $2k → 7%EMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUS: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
NY
MA
IN
PA
CA
MO
VA
MD
AZ
KS
NC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$167k · 54 repeat orgs$60k to everyone else

54 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2025, 32 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

54
64

Total granted

$167k
$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+4%

Still filing today

30%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DI
    DISCALCED INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $14k · revenue +7%
  • Williams College
    2× · 2024–2025 · $7k · revenue +18%
  • SJ
    Sister Jose Women's Center
    2× · 2024–2025 · $3k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $4k
  • WC
    WILLIAMS COLLEGE MUSEUM BUILDING
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
  • AL
    ARCHITECTURAL LEAGUE OF NY
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
Greater Boston Food Bank Inc

Our costs consist of acquiring, sorting and distributing food to 617 member agencies, transportation and logistics, and community outreach to 69 direct distribution sites such as gbfb mobile markets, and federal distributions for low…

—
4
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

—
5
Boston Public Library Fund Inc

The boston public library fund provides financial support to the boston public library (bpl), ensuring that it remains viable, engaging, accessible, and free to all. the library fund fulfills this mission by working in partnership with…

Education
6
Neighborhealth Corporation

Neighborhealth's mission is to promote and sustain healthy communities, families, and individuals by providing accessible, person-centered, and compassionate, high-quality health care services to all who live and work in our service area,…

Health
7
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
8
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education
9
Boston Harbor Now Inc

Our mission is to ensure that the people of greater boston benefit from a vibrant, resilient, and inclusive waterfront, harbor, and islands; these spaces are equitable, accessible, and adapted to climate change; and to ensure our public,…

Environment
10
Aclu Foundation of Massachusetts Inc

Aclu foundation of ma was established to defend freedoms guaranteed in the constitution and bill of rights through public education and litigation.

Civil Rights
11
The Boston Foundation for Sight Inc

Our mission is to improve quality of life by transforming the understanding, treatment, and care of the ocular surface.

Human Services
12
Mass General Brigham Health Plan Inc

Mass general brigham health plan's mission is to promote the health and wellness of our members, and to help ensure equitable, affordbale health care for the diverse communities we serve.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Bedford Women's Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is St Louis Classical Guitar. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 134 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/38
Grantees still filing
19/38
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MARK MORRIS DANCE GROUP: $25,500 · OtherMARK MORRIS DANCE GROUPINSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC ARCHITECTURE: $12,950 · OtherINSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC ARCHITECTURECENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY: $7,865 · OtherTHE ARCHITECTURAL LEAGUE OF NEW YORK: $6,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $5,750 · Other+107 more: $109,760 · Other+107 moreINSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC ARCHITECTURE INC: $10,100 · EducationINSTITUTE…Williams College: $6,500 · EducationWilliams …+7 more: $2,700 · Education+7 moreDISCALCED INC: $14,000 · Arts & CultureST LOUIS CLASSICAL GUITAR: $2,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureFRESHMAN FRESH START INC: $3,075 · Human ServicesTUCSON CENTERS FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC DBA EMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE: $2,300 · Human ServicesNEWTON AT HOME INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE: $400 · Human ServicesBUTTONWOOD PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC: $6,000 · AnimalsBREAKING GROUND HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATION: $3,000 · Housing & ShelterSister Jose Women's Center: $2,500 · Housing & ShelterROSIE'S PLACE INC: $500 · Housing & ShelterMAEDAY RESCUE INC: $3,000 · PhilanthropyLIBERTY HILL FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Philanthropy
Other$167,825Education$19,300Arts & Culture$17,000Human Services$7,775Animals$6,000Housing & Shelter$6,000Philanthropy$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDISCALCED INC: $14,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC ARCHITECTURE INC: $10,100 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetWilliams College: $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARCHITECTURAL LEAGUE OF NEW YORK: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFRESHMAN FRESH START INC: $3,075 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetBREAKING GROUND HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAEDAY RESCUE INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSister Jose Women's Center: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTUCSON CENTERS FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC DBA EMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE: $2,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEWTON AT HOME INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHOLLYWOOD FOOD COALITION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIBERTY HILL FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBUZZARDS BAY COALITION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS CLASSICAL GUITAR: $2,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN'S LUNCH PLACE INC: $1,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHARLEY'S FUND INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of the Dartmouth Libraries Inc: $500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetROSIE'S PLACE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget826 BOSTON INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLIC LIBRARY ASSOCIATION OF EASTHAMPTON: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBECCA SCHMILL FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFRIENDSHIPWORKS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEWTON FOOD PANTRY INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARK SCHOOL CORPORATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILTON ACADEMY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW BEDFORD WOMEN'S CENTER INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AND STATE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DISCALCED INC ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC ARCHITECTURE INC ↗
  • Who funds Williams College ↗
  • Who funds THE ARCHITECTURAL LEAGUE OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds BUTTONWOOD PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds FRESHMAN FRESH START INC ↗
  • Who funds BREAKING GROUND HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds MAEDAY RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds Sister Jose Women's Center ↗
  • Who funds TUCSON CENTERS FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC DBA EMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE ↗
  • Who funds NEWTON AT HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds HOLLYWOOD FOOD COALITION ↗
  • Who funds LIBERTY HILL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BUZZARDS BAY COALITION ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS CLASSICAL GUITAR ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Eastern Bank FoundationMA14.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Eastern Bank Foundation · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Boston Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The W & R Bernheimer Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The W & R Bernheimer Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • New Bedford Women's Center Inc: 84% of income from government
  • Buzzards Bay Coalition: 37% of income from government
  • Women's Lunch Place Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • 826 Boston Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Newton at Home Inc: 3% of income from government
  • National Yiddish Book Center Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Rosie's Place Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Public Library Association of Easthampton: 0% of income from government
  • Milton Academy: 0% of income from government
  • Williams College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 134 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on W & R Bernheimer Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph