Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Vos Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$100k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$609kInternational$477kArts & Culture$151kScience & Tech$75kCivil Rights$25kAnimals$20kHuman Services$12kEnvironment$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$449k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
American Horse Trials Foundation$60,000
Shakespeare Theatre Company$25,000
Upperville Colt & Horse Show$10,000
Cleveland & Woodley Park Village$2,500
Vinceremos Therapeutic Horsemanship Center$1,700
United States Equestrian Team Foundation$1,106
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 81% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PAN MASS CHALLENGE: $500 → 7%PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD: $25k → 8%PLANTATION FIELDS EQUESTRIAN: $3k → 6%EDEN REFORESTATION PROJECTS: $107k → 14%AIKEN HORSE PARK FOUNDATION: $3k → 17%SHAKESPEARE THEATRE COMPANY: $35k → 14%Vinceremos Therapeutic Horsemanship Center: $2k → 11%UNITED STATES EQUESTRIAN TEAM FOUNDATION: $25k → 5%UPPERVILLE COLT AND HORSE: $258 → 4%Piedmont Environmental Council: $5k → 6%ATHLETES FOR HOPE: $500 → 8%MARYLAND FIVE STAR HORSE TRIALS: $10k → 10%AMERICAN HORSE TRIALS FOUNDATION: $85k → 11%KENTUCKY HORSE PARK FOUNDATION: $30k → 15%PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD: $25k → 8%PLANTATION FIELDS EQUESTRIAN: $1k → 6%EDEN REFORESTATION PROJECTS: $100k → 14%Shakespeare Theatre Company: $25k → 14%US EQUESTRIAN TEAM FOUNDATION: $25k → 5%GREEN MEADOW FOUNDATION: $6k → 6%MARYLAND FIVE STAR HORSE TRIALS: $10k → 10%AMERICAN HORSE TRIALS FOUNDATION: $65k → 11%CARR CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS POLICY: $25k → 8%EDEN REFORESTATION PROJECTS: $100k → 14%Shakespeare Theatre Company: $25k → 14%US EQUESTRIAN TEAM FOUNDATION: $25k → 5%GREAT MEADOW INTERNATIONAL: $5k → 6%AMERICAN HORSE TRIALS FOUNDATION: $60k → 11%PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD: $25k → 8%EDEN REFORESTATION PROJECTS: $96k → 14%SHAKESPEARE THEATRE COMPANY: $24k → 14%US EQUESTRIAN TEAM FOUNDATION: $25k → 5%American Horse Trials Foundation: $60k → 11%EDEN REFORESTATION PROJECTS: $66k → 14%SHAKESPEARE THEATRE COMPANY: $20k → 14%United States Equestrian Team Foundation: $15k → 5%AMERICAN HORSE TRIALS FOUNDATION: $60k → 11%Eden Reforestation Projects: $8k → 14%SHAKESPEARE THEATRE COMPANY: $13k → 14%United States Equestrian Team Foundation: $1k → 5%American Horse Trials Foundation: $60k → 11%SHAKESPEARE THEATRE COMPANY: $10k → 14%AMERICAN HORSE TRIALS FOUNDATION: $40k → 11%Cleveland & Woodley Park Village: $5k → 14%Cleveland & Woodley Park Village: $3k → 14%CLEVELAND & WOODLEY PARK VILLAGE: $3k → 14%CLEVELAND & WOODLEY PARK VILLAGE: $1k → 14%CLEVELAND & WOODLEY PARK VILLAGE: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MA
PA
NJ
CA
KY
VA
MD
SC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 8 repeat orgs$77k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
10

Total granted

$1.2M
$75k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+85%

Still filing today

75%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Recreation & SportsEnvironmentInternationalArts & CultureAnimalsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EP
    EDEN PEOPLEPLANET
    6× · 2018–2023 · $477k · revenue +289%
  • AH
    AMERICAN HORSE TRIALS FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $430k · revenue +31%
  • US
    UNITED STATES EQUESTRIAN TEAM FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $116k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • KH
    KENTUCKY HORSE PARK FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue -49%
  • CC
    CARR CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS POLICY
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • GM
    GREAT MEADOW FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2018 · $6k · revenue -64%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Breeders' Cup Limited

To conduct the breeders' cup world championships at the highest levels of quality, safety and integrity and to promote the growth of thoroughbred breeding, racing and sales through proactive leadership, innovation and service.

—
2
United States Equestrian Federation Inc

The united states equestrian federation's mission is to provide access to and increase participation in equestrian sports at all levels by ensuring fairness, safety, and enjoyment.

Recreation & Sports
3
United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee

Empowering the competitive excellence and well-being of team usa athletes, championing the power of sport, and inspiring the nation.

Recreation & Sports
4
Grayson-Jockey Club Research Foundation Inc

The organization is committed to the advancement of research to enhance the safety and health of the horse.

Animals
5
American Paint Horse Association

The mission of the american paint horse association is to collect, record and preserve the pedigrees of american paint horses, and to stimulate and regulate all matters pertaining to the promotion, history, breeding and exhibition of this…

—
6
Home Planet Fund

None

Environment
7
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
8
The Jockey Club

The organization is dedicated to the improvement of thoroughbred breeding and racing. It fulfills that mandate by serving many segments of the industry through its subsidiary companies and by providing support to a wide range of industry…

Recreation & Sports
9
Horse Country Inc

Horse country, inc. is a coordinated equine industry initiative to connect guests to the horse, land, and people of kentucky's signature equine industry through immerserive experiences at unique member locations. horse country, inc.…

Membership Benefit
10
Harvard Conservation Trust

To preserve the unique character and natural resources of harvard.

Environment
11
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
12
Washington International Horse Show

The Washingon International Horse Show is a historic, world class equestrian event that engages,entertains and educates the Washington DC community while supporting charitable and military causes

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Horse Trials Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Aiken Horse Park Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN HORSE TRIALS FOUNDATION INC: $430,000 · Recreation & SportsAMERICAN HORSE TRIALS FOUNDATION INCUNITED STATES EQUESTRIAN TEAM FOUNDATION INC: $116,106 · Recreation & SportsUNITED STATES EQUESTRIAN TEAM FOUNDATION INCKENTUCKY HORSE PARK FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · Recreation & SportsUPPERVILLE COLT & HORSE SHOW INC: $22,266 · Recreation & SportsEDEN PEOPLEPLANET: $476,979 · InternationalEDEN PEOPLEPLANETTHE SHAKESPEARE THEATRE: $151,400 · Arts & CultureTHE SHAKESPE…President and Fellows of Harvard College: $75,000 · EducationCARR CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS POLICY: $25,000 · OtherMARYLAND FIVE STAR HORSE TRIALS: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $4,900 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $3,500 · OtherAIKEN HORSE PARK FOUNDATION: $2,500 · Other+5 more: $3,258 · OtherCLEVELAND PARK VILLAGE INC: $12,000 · Food & NutritionGREAT MEADOW FOUNDATION INC: $5,900 · EnvironmentTHE PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL: $5,000 · Environment
Recreation & Sports$598,372International$476,979Arts & Culture$151,400Education$75,000Other$59,158Food & Nutrition$12,000Environment$10,900

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEDEN PEOPLEPLANET: $476,979 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetAMERICAN HORSE TRIALS FOUNDATION INC: $430,000 over 7y, 3.1% of budgetTHE SHAKESPEARE THEATRE: $151,400 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED STATES EQUESTRIAN TEAM FOUNDATION INC: $116,106 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $75,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKENTUCKY HORSE PARK FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetUPPERVILLE COLT & HORSE SHOW INC: $22,266 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCLEVELAND PARK VILLAGE INC: $12,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetGREAT MEADOW FOUNDATION INC: $5,900 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetATHLETES FOR HOPE: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA11× affinity7 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Vos Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Vos Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Vos Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Vos Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Vos’ filings →

More from the funding graph