Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Victoria Casey and Peter Teeley Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$10k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$62kHealth$30kCivil Rights$20kYouth Development$10kHuman Services$8kPhilanthropy$7kFood & Nutrition$4kPublic Safety & Disaster$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$75k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST ANDREWS EPIS SCHOOL$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%DC CHILDRENS TRUST FUND: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 100% of The Victoria Casey and Peter Teeley Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 45% of the giving stays in MD; by stated purpose, 0%.

The Victoria Casey and Peter Teeley Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$89k · 7 repeat orgs$54k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
15

Total granted

$89k
$54k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+4%

Still filing today

71%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WH
    WASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER CORPORATION
    2× · 2022–2023 · $30k · revenue +12%
  • GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2020–2021 · $13k · revenue +36%
  • TH
    THE HOLTON ARMS SCHOOL
    3× · 2017–2019 · $12k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • FT
    FOUNDATION TO CHANGE GUN LAWS IN AMERICA INC
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
  • TP
    THE PETER B TEELEY CHILDRENS CHARITIES FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue -16%
  • FF
    FOXHALL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Seton Hall University

Seton hall university is a catholic institution of higher education

—
2
Harvard Club of Washington Dc

To inform and enrich the intellectual lives of 20,000 alumni of harvard university in the washington, dc area and to assist harvard university with respect to applicants and undergraduates from the dc area.

Education
3
St Mary's University

St. marys university, as a catholic marianist university, fosters the formation of people in faith and educates leaders for the common good through community, integrated liberal arts and professional education, and academic excellence.

—
4
The Collegiate School

To create a diverse and inclusive community of learners committed to a challenging and supportive educational experience that will foster the intellectual, moral, emotional, and physical development of each student.

Education
5
Capitol Hill Day School

Capitol Hill Day School is a co-educational independent school serving students from pre-kindergarten through 8th grade. Capitol Hill Day School deeply engages a diverse community of students in connecting the classroom with the larger…

Education
6
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
7
Johns Hopkins University

The mission of the johns hopkins university is to educate its students and cultivate their capacity for life-long learning, to foster independent and original research, and to bring the benefits of discovery to the world.

Education
8
Washington College

Washington college challenges and inspires emerging citizen leaders to discover lives of purpose and passion.core valueswe share these values of our founding patron, george washington: integrity, determination, curiosity, civility,…

Education
9
The Seed Public Charter School of Washington Dc

The seed public charter school of washington, dc is a public college-preparatory boarding school whose primary mission is to provide an outstanding intensive educational program that prepares children, both academically and socially, for…

Education
10
Phillips Exeter Academy

Unite goodness and knowledge and inspire youth from every quarter to lead purposeful lives. [text in quotations is taken from the academy's deed of gift, drafted in 1781] knowledge and goodness "above all, it is expected that the attention…

Education
11
The Georgetown Trust
Education
12
Washington & Jefferson College

To graduate people of uncommon integrity, competence, and maturity, who are effective lifelong learners and responsible citizens, and who are prepared to contribute substantially to the world in which they live.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Georgetown University; the most unlike its peers is Foxhall Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST ANDREWS EPIS SCHOOL: $27,000 · OtherST ANDREWS EPIS SCHOOLFOUNDATION TO CHANGE GUN LAWS IN AMERICA INC: $20,000 · OtherFOUNDATION TO CHANGE GUN LAWS IN AMERICA INCFOXHALL FOUNDATION: $5,000 · OtherFOXHALL FOUNDATIONST ANDREW'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL INC: $3,000 · OtherDC CHILDREN TRUST FOR CHILD: $2,500 · Other+8 more: $6,750 · Other+8 moreGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $13,000 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITYTHE HOLTON ARMS SCHOOL: $12,000 · EducationTHE HOLTON ARMS SCHOOLWHEELING JESUIT UNIVERSITY INC: $2,500 · EducationWHEELING JESUIT UNIVERSI…THE HARBOR SCHOOL CORPORATION: $2,000 · EducationTHE HARBOR SCHOOL CORPOR…+1 more: $1,000 · EducationWASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER CORPORATION: $30,000 · HealthWASHINGTON HOSPITAL CEN…THE PETER B TEELEY CHILDRENS CHARITIES FOUNDATION INC: $9,750 · Youth DevelopmentDC CHILDREN'S TRUST FUND: $5,000 · Human ServicesCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $3,500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$64,250Education$30,500Health$30,000Youth Development$9,750Human Services$5,000Food & Nutrition$3,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER CORPORATION: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $13,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOLTON ARMS SCHOOL: $12,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PETER B TEELEY CHILDRENS CHARITIES FOUNDATION INC: $9,750 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetDC CHILDREN'S TRUST FUND: $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST ANDREW'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWHEELING JESUIT UNIVERSITY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HARBOR SCHOOL CORPORATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFoxhall Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetEDLAVITCH JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF WASHINGTON DC INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIG GREEN SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA8.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Victoria Casey and Peter Teeley Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Victoria Casey and Peter Teeley Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Victoria Casey and Peter Teeley Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Victoria Casey and Peter Teeley Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Victoria Casey and Peter Teeley’s filings →

    More from the funding graph