Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

The Vanadium Charitable Foundation

To provide financial assistance to worthy causes

$28k
Granted FY2020
19
Grants FY2020
2
States reached
$6k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

54% of The Vanadium Charitable Foundation’s FY2022 grant dollars went to University Of Notre Dame Du Lac, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2022 names 6 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year The Vanadium Charitable Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 12 organizations, $28k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

3
18
4
19
12
20
1
21
6
22

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182022.

Recreation & Sports$57kEducation$52kHuman Services$27kYouth Development$24kHealth$19kInternational$10kEmployment$1kPhilanthropy$1kOther$0
02FY2020 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$500
Median grant
2
States reached
$311
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS ACADEMY$6,000
FAMILY & CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION$5,000
THE GREEN VALE SCHOOL$5,000
COLGATE UNIVERSITY$3,000
LUEKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$1,000
COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY$1,000
WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE$1,000
COLGATE FUND$1,000
ST FRANCIS HOSPITAL$500
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF AMERICA$500
GLEN COVE HOSPITAL$500
SEAWANHAKA CORINTHIAN YACHT CLUB EMPLOYEE FUND$500
MYSTIC SEAPORT MUSEUM$500
MEADOWBROOK CLUB EMPLOYEE FUND$500
BONE MARROW AND CANCER FOUNDATION$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–21, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%FAMILY & CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION: $5k → 6%THE BOOK FAIRIES: $17k → 6%FAMILY & CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION: $5k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

48%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$66k · 5 repeat orgs$70k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2020, 1 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
2

Total granted

$66k
$559

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+55%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 13% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $42k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22
EducationHealthYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesScience & TechArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GC
    GLEN COVE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB AT LINCOLN HOUSE INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $23k · revenue +36%
  • GV
    GREEN VALE SCHOOL
    2× · 2018–2020 · $15k · revenue +2%
  • FA
    FRIENDS ACADEMY
    2× · 2020–2022 · $12k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • RR
    ROAD RUNNERS CLUB OF AMERICA INC
    one grant, 2019 · $295 · revenue +13%
  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEFgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $264 · revenue +55%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

4
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Brooklyn Law School

To provide students with the knowledge, skills, ethical values needed for a career in law.

Education
11
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
12
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friends Academy and the most unlike its peers is University of Notre Dame du Lac. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 49 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%9%10–20yr19%32%20–35yr14%18%35–55yr15%41%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%14%10–20yr19%18%20–35yr14%38%35–55yr15%30%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/22
the rest of the field
13%
9,056/70,640

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
16/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

University of Notre Dame du Lac — $56,000 · EducationUniversity of Notre Dame du LacGREEN VALE SCHOOL — $15,000 · EducationGREEN VALE SCHOOLFRIENDS ACADEMY — $12,000 · EducationFRIENDS ACADEMYEDUCATE BWINDI — $10,000 · EducationEDUCATE BWINDILA SCUOLA D ITALIA-GUGLIELMO MARCONI — $10,000 · EducationLA SCUOLA D ITALIA-GUGLIELMO MARCONIROBIN HOOD PTO INC — $6,412 · EducationROBIN HOOD PTO INC+1 more — $3,000 · EducationBOOK FAIRIES INC — $17,000 · Human ServicesBOOK FAIRIES IN…FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY AND CHIL…GLEN COVE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB AT LINCOLN HOUSE INC — $23,125 · Youth DevelopmentGLEN COVE BOY…+1 more — $500 · Youth DevelopmentCAROL M BALDWIN BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FUND OF CENTRAL NEW YORK INC — $10,000 · HealthCAROL M BA…BONE MARROW & CANCER FOUNDATION INC — $5,500 · HealthBONE MARRO…BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $1,000 · HealthBLOOD CANC…+3 more — $1,250 · Health+3 moreWESTCHESTER DAY SCHOOL — $5,250 · OtherWEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE — $1,000 · OtherCOLGATE FUND — $1,000 · OtherMEADOWBROOK CLUB EMPLOYEE FUND — $500 · OtherSEAWANHAKA CORINTHIAN YACHT CLUB EMPLOYEE FUND — $500 · OtherTHE UNION LEAGUE CLUB EMPLOYEE FUND — $325 · Other+4 more — $1,009 · OtherCOLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY — $1,000 · Science & TechMYSTIC SEAPORT MUSEUM INC — $500 · Arts & Culture
Education$112,412Human Services$27,000Youth Development$23,625Health$17,750Other$9,584Science & Tech$1,000Arts & Culture$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac — $56,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLEN COVE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB AT LINCOLN HOUSE INC — $23,125 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetBOOK FAIRIES INC — $17,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetGREEN VALE SCHOOL — $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS ACADEMY — $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAROL M BALDWIN BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FUND OF CENTRAL NEW YORK INC — $10,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetFAMILY AND CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEDUCATE BWINDI — $10,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetLA SCUOLA D ITALIA-GUGLIELMO MARCONI — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBONE MARROW & CANCER FOUNDATION INC — $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOLGATE UNIVERSITY — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST FRANCIS HOSPITAL — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLEN COVE HOSPITAL — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMYSTIC SEAPORT MUSEUM INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROAD RUNNERS CLUB OF AMERICA INC — $295 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $264 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOOMER ESIASON FOUNDATION — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The New York Community TrustNY15× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The New York Community Trust · The Bahnik Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Vanadium Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 5%
  • Mystic Seaport Museum Inc5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Vanadium Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Vanadium Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph