Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Van Buren Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$371k
Granted FY2024still arriving
33
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Community Improvement$242kArts & Culture$180kRecreation & Sports$171kEducation$163kPublic Safety & Disaster$100kEnvironment$91kPublic Benefit$88kHealth$68kOther$0
02FY2024 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k22 grants · $80k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $291k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CITY OF KEOSAUQUA$40,000
VILLAGES OF VAN BUREN$39,000
VBC TRAILS ASSOCIATION$38,000
VAN BUREN HISTORICAL SOCIETY$35,373
VAN BUREN COUNTY COMMUNITY SCHOOL$34,500
Individual grant recipient$27,500
Individual grant recipient$25,000
FARMINGTON EMERGENCY RESPONDERS$15,000
CITY OF FARMINGTON - EMS$14,000
BONAPARTE COMM IMPROVEMENT ASSN$12,493
INDIAN HILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FDTN$10,000
CHRIST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$7,200
UNIVERSITY OF IOWA$6,000
MILTON LIONS CLUB$6,000
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CITY OF BIRMINGHAM FIRE DEPT: $10k → 13%AMERICAN LEGION: $50k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF IOWA: $8k → 15%INDIAN HILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FDTN: $10k → 16%CITY OF BIRMINGHAM: $9k → 13%CITY OF FARMINGTON: $20k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF IOWA: $6k → 15%CITY OF BIRMINGHAM: $8k → 13%FARMINGTON EMERGENCY RESPONDERS: $15k → 14%CITY OF FARMINGTON: $15k → 14%CITY OF FARMINGTON: $15k → 14%CITY OF FARMINGTON - EMS: $14k → 14%FARMINGTON FIRST RESPONDERS: $10k → 14%MILTON LIONS CLUB: $6k → 13%DOUDS CELESTIAL LODGE: $18k → 13%VBC AGRICULTURAL ASSOCIATION INC: $18k → 13%DOUDS METHODIST CHURCH: $15k → 13%VBC AGRICULTURAL ASSOCIATION INC: $10k → 13%DOUDS UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $10k → 13%DOUDS COMMUNITY CLUB: $9k → 13%ZION LUTHERAN CEMETERY: $8k → 13%STOCKPORT HERITAGE SOCIETY: $8k → 13%BONAPARTE EMS: $25k → 13%BONAPARTE FIRE DEPARTMENT: $13k → 13%BONAPARTE COMM IMPROVEMENT ASSN: $12k → 13%BONAPARTE COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT: $10k → 13%CITY OF KEOSAUQUA: $40k → 13%VILLAGES OF VAN BUREN: $39k → 13%VBC TRAILS ASSOCIATION: $38k → 13%VAN BUREN HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $35k → 13%VILLAGES OF VAN BUREN: $35k → 13%VAN BUREN CONSERVATION BOARD: $35k → 13%VAN BUREN COUNTY COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $35k → 13%VILLAGES OF VAN BUREN: $34k → 13%VILLAGES OF VAN BUREN: $34k → 13%VILLAGES OF VAN BUREN: $34k → 13%VILLAGES OF VAN BUREN: $34k → 13%FRIENDS OF LACEY: $28k → 13%VAN BUREN HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $20k → 13%VAN BUREN COUNTY HOSPITAL: $20k → 13%CITY OF KEOSAUQUA: $10k → 13%KEOSAUQUA SENIOR CENTER: $10k → 13%CITY OF KEOSAUQUA: $10k → 13%KEOSAUQUA VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT: $10k → 13%VAN BUREN COUNTY HOSPITAL: $10k → 13%VAN BUREN COUNTY TRAILS ASSN: $10k → 13%ENGAGE KEOSAUQUA: $8k → 13%CHRIST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $7k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$803k · 38 repeat orgs$504k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +13% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

38 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
70

Total granted

$803k
$335k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+2%

Still filing today

13%
6%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $169k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CulturePublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VO
    VILLAGES OF VAN BUREN INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $213k · revenue +39% · 27% of their budget
  • IH
    INDIAN HILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    4× · 2021–2024 · $13k · revenue +1%
  • WP
    WILLIAM PENN UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2021–2022 · $9k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • AL
    AMERICAN LEGION
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • VB
    VAN BUREN CONSERVATION BOARD
    one grant, 2020 · $35k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $18k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cornell College

Cornell college offers an innovative and rigorous learning community where faculty and staff collaborate with students to develop the intellectual curiosity, creativity and moral courage necessary for a lifetime of learning and engaged…

Education
2
Wiley College

Provide a liberal arts education with globally focused endeavors to provide an intellectually stimulating environment, promoting student competencies in communication, as well as critical and analytical thinking.

Education
3
Texas College

To ensure that the student body experiences balanced intellectual, psychological, social and spiritual development, aimed at enabling them to become active productive members of society where they live and work.

Education
4
The Trustees of Grinnell College

To educate students in the liberal arts through free inquiry and the open exchange of ideas.when grinnell college framed its charter in the iowa territory of the united states in 1846, it set forth a mission to educate its students "for…

Education
5
Coker University

Coker university is a student-centered, comprehensive university. it is dedicated to providing every student an academic curriculum based upon a uniformly excellent liberal arts core that enhances the structured development of key personal…

Education
6
The College of Wooster

The college of wooster is a community of independent minds, working together to prepare students to become leaders of character and influence in an interdependent global community. (continued on schedule o)we engage motivated students in a…

Education
7
Luther College

Founded by the norwegian evangelical lutheran church in 1861, luther college is a four-year, residential liberal arts institution. luther welcomes students of all backgrounds to engage in a way of learning that moves beyond immediate…

Education
8
Oak Valley College

Equip students to live, learn, and grow in their faith, service, and calling through a Bachelor of Arts in Business framed by a Christian worldview with no student loans.

Education
9
Vaughn College of Aeronautics and Technology

To provide a dynamic learning environment built on our aeronautical heritage that inspires a diverse and committed community of students to achieve success as leaders in the industries we serve.

Education
10
Cumberland University

The mission of cumberland university is to provide a personalized, high-quality, value-based educational experience that equips learners to lead, serve, and excel in an ever-evolving world.

—
11
Geneva College

Geneva college is a christ-centered academic community that provides a comprehensive education to equip students for faithful and fruitful service to god and neighbor.

Education
12
Raritan Valley Community College

Raritan Valley Community College is an educational community that works to develop critical thinking, foster intellectual curiosity, promote leadership, encourage social responsibility and support personal growth.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Indian Hills Community College; the most unlike its peers is Van Buren County Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 119 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VILLAGES OF VAN BUREN INC: $212,500 · OtherVILLAGES OF VAN BUREN INCCITY OF KEOSAUQUA: $66,354 · OtherCITY OF KEOSAUQUACITY OF FARMINGTON: $53,000 · OtherVAN BUREN COUNTY HOSPITAL: $51,905 · OtherAMERICAN LEGION: $50,000 · Other+107 more: $776,277 · Other+107 moreVan Buren County Historical Society: $63,284 · Arts & CultureINDIAN HILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · EducationWILLIAM PENN UNIVERSITY: $8,500 · EducationGRAND VIEW UNIVERSITY: $3,000 · EducationGRACELAND UNIVERSITY: $2,000 · Education+1 more: $500 · EducationKEOSAUQUA VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT INC: $10,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$1,210,036Arts & Culture$63,284Education$24,000Public Safety & Disaster$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVILLAGES OF VAN BUREN INC: $212,500 over 6y, 27% of budgetVan Buren County Historical Society: $63,284 over 5y, 36% of budgetINDIAN HILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $13,250 over 4y, 6.7% of budgetKEOSAUQUA VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetINDIAN HILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWILLIAM PENN UNIVERSITY: $8,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGRAND VIEW UNIVERSITY: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNortheastern Oklahoma A&M College Development Foundation Inc: $2,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGRACELAND UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOE COLLEGE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VILLAGES OF VAN BUREN INC ↗
  • Who funds Van Buren County Historical Society ↗
  • Who funds INDIAN HILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds KEOSAUQUA VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT INC ↗
  • Who funds INDIAN HILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

William M & Donna J Hoaglin Foundation IncIA28.5× affinity11 shared granteesties to 4 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: William M & Donna J Hoaglin Foundation Inc · Quad Cities Community Foundation · Harry and Winnie McNay Education Trust · Moore Scholarship Trust · Pella Rolscreen Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Van Buren Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Van Buren Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 119 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Van Buren’s filings →

    More from the funding graph