Skip to content
The Valley Hospital Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

The Valley Hospital Inc

The valley hospital serves the community by healing and caring for patients, comforting their families and teaching good health.

$131M
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$131M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$523MPublic Benefit$116kCommunity Improvement$84kHousing & Shelter$70kHuman Services$69kArts & Culture$54kPublic Safety & Disaster$50kInternational$35kOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $187k
  • $250k+2 grants · $131M
$12,740
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.5B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VALLEY PHYSICIAN SERVICES INC$130,744,481
VALLEY HEALTH SYSTEM INC$344,547
BERGEN VOLUNTEER MEDICAL INITIATIVE$30,000
BOROUGH OF PARAMUS$25,000
PONY POWER THERAPIES INC$20,000
BERGEN PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC$15,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$15,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$15,000
CHILDREN'S AID & FAMILY SERVICES$13,000
MAHWAH REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$12,740
CHRISTIAN HEALTH CARE CENTER$11,000
NJ HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION$10,000
FAMILY PROMISE$10,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PATERSON$10,000
WEST BERGEN MENTAL HEALTH INC$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $193k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 21% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SPECTRUM FOR LIVING DEVELOPMENT INC: $10k → 7%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $25k → 16%PONY POWER THERAPIES INC: $21k → 7%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $15k → 16%PONY POWER THERAPIES INC: $20k → 7%PONY POWER THERAPIES INC: $18k → 7%PONY POWER THERAPIES INC: $15k → 7%RIDGEWOOD YMCA: $8k → 7%RIDGEWOOD YMCA: $7k → 7%RIDGEWOOD YMCA: $6k → 7%CHILDREN'S AID & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $15k → 7%CHILDREN'S AID & FAMILY SERVICES: $13k → 7%CHILDREN'S AID & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $11k → 7%CHILDREN'S AID & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $9k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$524M · 21 repeat orgs$158k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
13

Total granted

$524M
$141k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+16%

Still filing today

86%
77%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureInternationalHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VP
    VALLEY PHYSICIAN SERVICES INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $520M · revenue +41% · 87% of their budget
  • VH
    VALLEY HEALTH SYSTEM INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $3.0M · revenue +20%
  • BV
    BERGEN VOLUNTEER MEDICAL INITIATIVE INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $143k · revenue +141%

Funded once

  • US
    U S-UKRAINE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -77%
  • RC
    RAMAPO COLLEGE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +27%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Humc Cardiovascular Partners Pc

The organization provides high quality medical care to the community that it serves and specifically provides cardiology & related professional medical services in conjunction with hmh hospitals corp.

Health
2
Humc Medical Observation Pa

To serve as the physician services component of a tax-exempt healthcare delivery network and to thereby promote, support & further the charitable purposes, programs & services of hmh hospitals corp.

—
3
Bridgton Hospital

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment, and compassion ofour family of caregivers.

Health
4
Hackensack Specialty Care Associates Pc

To serve as the physician services component of a tax-exempt healthcare delivery network and to thereby promote, support & further the charitable purposes, programs & services of hmh hospitals corp.

Health
5
Hmh Hospitals Corporation

The organization is committed to providing the full spectrum of life-enhancing care and services to create and sustain healthy, vibrant communities. please refer to schedule h, part vi, question 5 for the organization's community benefit…

Health
6
Jfk Medical Associates Pa

Jfk medical associates, p.a. is committed to excellence in providing quality and compassionate healthcare services to diverse communities.

Health
7
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
8
Community Medical Center

The organization, a not-for-profit acute care hospital serving the ocean county region, is committed to enhancing the overall health status of the community by providing the highest quality healthcare and related services including…

Health
9
Hartford HealthCare Medical Group Specialists Pllc

The Mission of Hartford HealthCare Medical Group Specialists, PLLC is to put the patients first, provide coordinated quality care and value, exceed the expectations of patients, providers, staff and the community that it serves.

Health
10
Vassar Brothers Hospital

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

Health
11
Mass General Brigham Health Plan Inc

Mass general brigham health plan's mission is to promote the health and wellness of our members, and to help ensure equitable, affordbale health care for the diverse communities we serve.

Health
12
The Cooper Health System a New Jersey Non-Profit Corporation

See schedule ocooper health system is an integrated health care delivery system serving the southern new jersey region. cooper health system's mission is to serve, to heal, and to educate. cooper accomplishes its mission through innovative…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cancer Care Inc; the most unlike its peers is Liberty Science Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
17/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VALLEY PHYSICIAN SERVICES INC: $519,691,584 · HealthVALLEY PHYSICIAN SERVICES INC+10 more: $3,322,804 · HealthParamus Health Dept: $125,500 · OtherMAHWAH REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC: $47,680 · OtherWEST BERGEN MENTAL HEALTHCARE INC: $32,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY MEALS INC: $26,000 · OtherMONTVALE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $22,500 · OtherVOLUNTEER CENTER OF BERGEN COUNTY INC: $24,500 · OtherRAMAPO COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Other+7 more: $58,895 · OtherPONY POWER THERAPIES INC: $93,650 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S AID AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $48,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $40,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF RIDGEWOOD NEW JERSEY: $21,250 · Human ServicesCharity Navigator: $10,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY PROMISE OF BERGEN COUNTY: $70,000 · Housing & ShelterBERGEN PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $45,000 · Arts & CultureLIBERTY SCIENCE CENTER: $5,500 · Arts & CultureU S-UKRAINE FOUNDATION: $25,000 · InternationalWELLS MOUNTAIN INITIATIVE INC: $10,000 · InternationalBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF PATERSON AND PASSAIC INC: $30,000 · Youth Development
Health$523,014,388Other$357,075Human Services$212,900Housing & Shelter$70,000Arts & Culture$50,500International$35,000Youth Development$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVALLEY PHYSICIAN SERVICES INC: $519,691,584 over 5y, 87% of budgetVALLEY HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $3,048,054 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetBERGEN VOLUNTEER MEDICAL INITIATIVE INC: $142,500 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetPONY POWER THERAPIES INC: $93,650 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF BERGEN COUNTY: $70,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S AID AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $48,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMAHWAH REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC: $47,680 over 4y, 7.6% of budgetBERGEN PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $45,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWEST BERGEN MENTAL HEALTHCARE INC: $32,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $31,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHARING NETWORK FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF PATERSON AND PASSAIC INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY MEALS INC: $26,000 over 4y, 6.2% of budgetU S-UKRAINE FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetVOLUNTEER CENTER OF BERGEN COUNTY INC: $24,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF RIDGEWOOD NEW JERSEY: $21,250 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetRAMAPO COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetChristian Health Care Center: $16,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADLER APHASIA CENTER: $13,750 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetWELLS MOUNTAIN INITIATIVE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCharity Navigator: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRIDGEWOOD BASEBALL & SOFTBALL ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetNEW JERSEY HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCancer Care Inc: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIBERTY SCIENCE CENTER: $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Columbia Bank Foundat…Community Foundation …Henry & Marilyn Taub …Pseg Foundation IncThe Kaplen FoundationAlfred N Sanzari Fami…Lillian P Schenck Tw …Td Charitable Foundat…Blue Foundry Charitab…Hackensack Meridian H…The Provident Bank Fo…The Richard a Stratto…
Columbia Bank FoundationNJ29.1× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Columbia Bank Foundation · Community Foundation of New Jersey · Henry & Marilyn Taub Foundation · Pseg Foundation Inc · The Kaplen Foundation · Alfred N Sanzari Family Foundation Inc · Lillian P Schenck Tw Lps Fund · Td Charitable Foundation · Blue Foundry Charitable Foundation Inc · Hackensack Meridian Health Inc-Subordinates · The Provident Bank Foundation · The Richard a Stratton and Loretta M Stratton Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Valley Hospital Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Valley Hospital Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Liberty Science Center: 14% of income from government
  • Adler Aphasia Center: 12% of income from government
  • West Bergen Mental Healthcare Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Volunteer Center of Bergen County Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Bergen Performing Arts Center Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Children's Aid and Family Services Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Ramapo College Foundation: 1% of income from government
  • Christian Health Care Center: 0% of income from government
  • New Jersey Hospital Association: 0% of income from government
  • Valley Health System Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Valley Hospital’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home