Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

The Valley Hospital Inc

The valley hospital serves the community by healing and caring for patients, comforting their families and teaching good health.

$131M
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$131M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.

Health$523MPublic Benefit$116kCommunity Improvement$84kHousing & Shelter$70kHuman Services$69kArts & Culture$54kPublic Safety & Disaster$50kInternational$35kOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $187k
  • $250k+2 grants · $131M
$12,740
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.5B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VALLEY PHYSICIAN SERVICES INC$130,744,481
VALLEY HEALTH SYSTEM INC$344,547
BERGEN VOLUNTEER MEDICAL INITIATIVE$30,000
BOROUGH OF PARAMUS$25,000
PONY POWER THERAPIES INC$20,000
BERGEN PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC$15,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$15,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$15,000
CHILDREN'S AID & FAMILY SERVICES$13,000
MAHWAH REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$12,740
CHRISTIAN HEALTH CARE CENTER$11,000
NJ HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION$10,000
FAMILY PROMISE$10,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PATERSON$10,000
WEST BERGEN MENTAL HEALTH INC$8,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $193k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 21% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SPECTRUM FOR LIVING DEVELOPMENT INC: $10k → 7%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $25k → 16%PONY POWER THERAPIES INC: $21k → 7%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $15k → 16%PONY POWER THERAPIES INC: $20k → 7%PONY POWER THERAPIES INC: $18k → 7%PONY POWER THERAPIES INC: $15k → 7%RIDGEWOOD YMCA: $8k → 7%RIDGEWOOD YMCA: $7k → 7%RIDGEWOOD YMCA: $6k → 7%CHILDREN'S AID & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $15k → 7%CHILDREN'S AID & FAMILY SERVICES: $13k → 7%CHILDREN'S AID & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $11k → 7%CHILDREN'S AID & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $9k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$524M · 21 repeat orgs$158k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +19% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
13

Total granted

$524M
$141k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+16%

Still filing today

86%
77%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureInternationalHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VP
    VALLEY PHYSICIAN SERVICES INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $520M · revenue +41% · 87% of their budget
  • VH
    VALLEY HEALTH SYSTEM INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $3.0M · revenue +20%
  • BV
    BERGEN VOLUNTEER MEDICAL INITIATIVE INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $143k · revenue +141%

Funded once

  • US
    U S-UKRAINE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -77%
  • RC
    RAMAPO COLLEGE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +27%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +16%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Humc Cardiovascular Partners Pc

The organization provides high quality medical care to the community that it serves and specifically provides cardiology & related professional medical services in conjunction with hmh hospitals corp.

Health
2
Bridgton Hospital

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment, and compassion ofour family of caregivers.

Health
3
Humc Medical Observation Pa

To serve as the physician services component of a tax-exempt healthcare delivery network and to thereby promote, support & further the charitable purposes, programs & services of hmh hospitals corp.

—
4
Hackensack Specialty Care Associates Pc

To serve as the physician services component of a tax-exempt healthcare delivery network and to thereby promote, support & further the charitable purposes, programs & services of hmh hospitals corp.

Health
5
Hmh Hospitals Corporation

The organization is committed to providing the full spectrum of life-enhancing care and services to create and sustain healthy, vibrant communities. please refer to schedule h, part vi, question 5 for the organization's community benefit…

Health
6
Champlain Valley Physicians Hospital Medical Center

Cvph medical center's mission is to provide quality health care for the north country region in upstate new york.

Health
7
Jfk Medical Associates Pa

Jfk medical associates, p.a. is committed to excellence in providing quality and compassionate healthcare services to diverse communities.

Health
8
Community Medical Centers Inc

The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.

Health
9
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
10
Mass General Brigham Health Plan Inc

Mass general brigham health plan's mission is to promote the health and wellness of our members, and to help ensure equitable, affordbale health care for the diverse communities we serve.

Health
11
Highmark Health

As the parent entity of a blended health organization, highmark health seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people and communities it serves by providing affordable, accessible and high-quality healthcare.

Health
12
The Cooper Health System a New Jersey Non-Profit Corporation

See schedule ocooper health system is an integrated health care delivery system serving the southern new jersey region. cooper health system's mission is to serve, to heal, and to educate. cooper accomplishes its mission through innovative…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Christian Health Care Center and the most unlike its peers is Liberty Science Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 51 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr21%0%10–20yr21%37%20–35yr14%19%35–55yr12%44%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr21%0%10–20yr21%99%20–35yr14%1%35–55yr12%0%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/35
the rest of the field
11%
3,192/30,407

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
17/29
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

VALLEY PHYSICIAN SERVICES INC — $519,691,584 · HealthVALLEY PHYSICIAN SERVICES INC+10 more — $3,322,804 · HealthParamus Health Dept — $125,500 · OtherMAHWAH REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC — $47,680 · OtherWEST BERGEN MENTAL HEALTHCARE INC — $32,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY MEALS INC — $26,000 · OtherMONTVALE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $22,500 · OtherVOLUNTEER CENTER OF BERGEN COUNTY INC — $24,500 · OtherRAMAPO COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $20,000 · Other+7 more — $58,895 · OtherPONY POWER THERAPIES INC — $93,650 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S AID AND FAMILY SERVICES INC — $48,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $40,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF RIDGEWOOD NEW JERSEY — $21,250 · Human ServicesCharity Navigator — $10,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY PROMISE OF BERGEN COUNTY — $70,000 · Housing & ShelterBERGEN PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC — $45,000 · Arts & CultureLIBERTY SCIENCE CENTER — $5,500 · Arts & CultureU S-UKRAINE FOUNDATION — $25,000 · InternationalWELLS MOUNTAIN INITIATIVE INC — $10,000 · InternationalBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF PATERSON AND PASSAIC INC — $30,000 · Youth Development
Health$523,014,388Other$357,075Human Services$212,900Housing & Shelter$70,000Arts & Culture$50,500International$35,000Youth Development$30,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetVALLEY PHYSICIAN SERVICES INC — $519,691,584 over 5y, 87% of budgetVALLEY HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $3,048,054 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetBERGEN VOLUNTEER MEDICAL INITIATIVE INC — $142,500 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetPONY POWER THERAPIES INC — $93,650 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF BERGEN COUNTY — $70,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S AID AND FAMILY SERVICES INC — $48,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMAHWAH REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC — $47,680 over 4y, 7.6% of budgetBERGEN PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC — $45,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWEST BERGEN MENTAL HEALTHCARE INC — $32,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $31,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHARING NETWORK FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF PATERSON AND PASSAIC INC — $30,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY MEALS INC — $26,000 over 4y, 6.2% of budgetU S-UKRAINE FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetVOLUNTEER CENTER OF BERGEN COUNTY INC — $24,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF RIDGEWOOD NEW JERSEY — $21,250 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetRAMAPO COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetChristian Health Care Center — $16,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADLER APHASIA CENTER — $13,750 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetRIDGEWOOD BASEBALL & SOFTBALL ASSOCIATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetCharity Navigator — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWELLS MOUNTAIN INITIATIVE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetNEW JERSEY HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCancer Care Inc — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIBERTY SCIENCE CENTER — $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Columbia Bank Foundat…Community Foundation …Henry & Marilyn Taub …Pseg Foundation IncThe Kaplen FoundationAlfred N Sanzari Fami…Lillian P Schenck Tw …Td Charitable Foundat…Blue Foundry Charitab…Hackensack Meridian H…The Provident Bank Fo…The Richard a Stratto…
Columbia Bank FoundationNJ29.1× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Columbia Bank Foundation · Community Foundation of New Jersey · Henry & Marilyn Taub Foundation · Pseg Foundation Inc · The Kaplen Foundation · Alfred N Sanzari Family Foundation Inc · Lillian P Schenck Tw Lps Fund · Td Charitable Foundation · Blue Foundry Charitable Foundation Inc · Hackensack Meridian Health Inc-Subordinates · The Provident Bank Foundation · The Richard a Stratton and Loretta M Stratton Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Valley Hospital Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Liberty Science Center — 14% of income from government
  • Adler Aphasia Center — 12% of income from government
  • West Bergen Mental Healthcare Inc — 5% of income from government
  • Volunteer Center of Bergen County Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Bergen Performing Arts Center Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Children's Aid and Family Services Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Ramapo College Foundation — 1% of income from government
  • Christian Health Care Center — 0% of income from government
  • New Jersey Hospital Association — 0% of income from government
  • Valley Health System Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines