Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Valentine Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$78k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$30kHuman Services$25kYouth Development$25kReligion$20kHealth$15kRecreation & Sports$15kCommunity Improvement$15kEducation$10k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $70k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$798k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALANO CLUB OF KNOXVILLE$15,000
KNOXVILLE LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION$15,000
OLIVE TREE EARLY LEARNING ACADEMY$10,000
CONNECT MINISTRIES$10,000
CARE CUTS$10,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE TENNESSEE VALLEY$10,000
KNOXVILLE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$5,000
THE CHANGE CENTER$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $46k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%OLIVE TREE EARLY LEARNING ACADEMY: $10k → 12%CONNECT MINISTRIES: $10k → 12%CONNECT MINISTRIES: $10k → 12%CARE CUTS: $10k → 12%CARE CUTS: $6k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

34%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$53k · 3 repeat orgs$102k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
5

Total granted

$53k
$54k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+10%

Still filing today

100%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $48k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthHousing & ShelterReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CM
    CONNECT MINISTRIES
    2× · 2023–2025 · $20k · revenue -50%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TENNESSEE VALL
    2× · 2023–2025 · $17k · revenue +3%
  • CI
    CARECUTS INC
    2× · 2023–2025 · $16k · revenue +96%

Funded once

  • HT
    HEALING THE HOME
    one grant, 2023 · $19k
  • TR
    THE RESTORATION HOUSE
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue -24%
  • ST
    SHANGRI-LA THERAPEUTIC ACADEMY OF RIDING INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +33%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Mend House Sober Living Community

The Mend House is a sober living community for men, in Knoxville, Tn. which empowers them to gain control over their actions, decisions and choices. The Mend House allows men to enjoy clean, sober and stable housing for up to 2 years while…

Health
2
Project Return Inc

People who have just been released from prison are typically stigmatized, overlooked, and pigeonholed by society. when they walk into project return, they discover that here they are valued, heard, and encouraged. while reduction of…

—
3
The Lazarus Project of Knoxville Llc

To provide residential recover programs to and rehabilitate individuals dealing with substance abuse addictions to enter society as productive members

—
4
Goodwill Industries - Knoxville Inc

Goodwill industries-knoxville, inc. (the organization") is a nonprofit corporation. our mission at goodwill industries-knoxville, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, is changing lives and strengthening families by helping people reach…

Employment
5
The Remnant House

The remnant house, located in lee county, mississippi provides men and women with a faith-based christian transitional living home and recovery program. our christ-centered one year transitional living recovery program allows an individual…

Health
6
Holt Street Miracle Center

A community based recovery center that provides transitional and long term housng to our vecterans, ex-offendrs and those who are coming from drug additon programs needing housng

Human Services
7
Tennessee Kids Belong Inc

Tennessee Kids Belong dramatically improves the experiences and outcomes for children in foster care.

Human Services
8
Welcome House Knoxville

Our Mission at Welcome House Knoxville is to share the love of Jesus through the ministries of hospitality and friendship. We provide safe and loving homes for individuals and families in transition to permanent housing.

Housing & Shelter
9
Habitat for Humanity of Greater Nashville

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

—
10
The House That Mercy Built

Faith based residential program that will provide a safe environment for women to be transformed from teh inside out. a place that helps women bring order, accountability, and a strong spiritual foundation where there has been chaos, lack…

Religion
11
Knoxville Area Urban League Incorporated

Knoxville area urban league, inc.'s mission is to enable african americans, other minority groups and the underserved to secure economic self-reliance, parity, power and civil rights.

Human Services
12
Good Samaritan Mission Inc

To care for the needy, share the good news of jesus christ and change lives by providing counseling, life skill training, dignity gained through work and christ-centered discipleship.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Knoxville Habitat for Humanity Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
4/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONNECT MINISTRIES: $20,000 · Human ServicesCONNECT MINISTRIESCARECUTS INC: $16,000 · Human ServicesCARECUTS INCOLIVE TREE EARLY LEARNING ACADEMY: $10,000 · Human ServicesOLIVE TREE EARLY LEARNING ACADEMYHEALING THE HOME: $19,210 · OtherHEALING THE HOMEALANO CLUB OF KNOXVILLE: $15,000 · OtherALANO CLUB OF KNOXVILLEKNOXVILLE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $5,000 · OtherKNOXVILLE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY I…DRUMS UP GUNS DOWN - AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAM: $5,000 · OtherDRUMS UP GUNS DOWN - AFTER SCHOO…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TENNESSEE VALL: $17,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS C…THE CHANGE CENTER: $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentTHE CHANGE CEN…KNOXVILLE LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · ReligionKNOXVILLE …THE RESTORATION HOUSE: $15,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE RESTOR…SHANGRI-LA THERAPEUTIC ACADEMY OF RIDING INC: $10,000 · HealthSHANGRI-LA…American Heart Association Inc: $5,000 · HealthAmerican H…
Human Services$46,000Other$44,210Youth Development$19,500Religion$15,000Housing & Shelter$15,000Health$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCONNECT MINISTRIES: $20,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TENNESSEE VALL: $17,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCARECUTS INC: $16,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetKNOXVILLE LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHANGRI-LA THERAPEUTIC ACADEMY OF RIDING INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetOLIVE TREE EARLY LEARNING ACADEMY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetKNOXVILLE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHANGE CENTER: $2,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lawson Family FoundationTN15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lawson Family Foundation · Thompson Charitable Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Valentine Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Valentine Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Valentine Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Valentine Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Valentine’s filings →

    More from the funding graph