Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Valentine Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$78k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20232025.

Housing & Shelter$30kHuman Services$25kYouth Development$25kReligion$20kHealth$15kRecreation & Sports$15kCommunity Improvement$15kEducation$10k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $70k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$798k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALANO CLUB OF KNOXVILLE$15,000
KNOXVILLE LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION$15,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE TENNESSEE VALLEY$10,000
OLIVE TREE EARLY LEARNING ACADEMY$10,000
CARE CUTS$10,000
CONNECT MINISTRIES$10,000
KNOXVILLE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$5,000
THE CHANGE CENTER$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $46k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%OLIVE TREE EARLY LEARNING ACADEMY: $10k → 12%CONNECT MINISTRIES: $10k → 12%CONNECT MINISTRIES: $10k → 12%CARE CUTS: $10k → 12%CARE CUTS: $6k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

34%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$53k · 3 repeat orgs$102k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
5

Total granted

$53k
$54k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+10%

Still filing today

100%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $48k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthHousing & ShelterReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CM
    CONNECT MINISTRIES
    2× · 2023–2025 · $20k · revenue -56%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TENNESSEE VALL
    2× · 2023–2025 · $17k · revenue +3%
  • CI
    CARECUTS INC
    2× · 2023–2025 · $16k · revenue +96%

Funded once

  • HT
    HEALING THE HOME
    one grant, 2023 · $19k
  • TR
    THE RESTORATION HOUSE
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue -24%
  • ST
    SHANGRI-LA THERAPEUTIC ACADEMY OF RIDING INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +33%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Mend House Sober Living Community

The Mend House is a sober living community for men, in Knoxville, Tn. which empowers them to gain control over their actions, decisions and choices. The Mend House allows men to enjoy clean, sober and stable housing for up to 2 years while…

Health
2
Project Return Inc

People who have just been released from prison are typically stigmatized, overlooked, and pigeonholed by society. when they walk into project return, they discover that here they are valued, heard, and encouraged. while reduction of…

3
The Lazarus Project of Knoxville Llc

To provide residential recover programs to and rehabilitate individuals dealing with substance abuse addictions to enter society as productive members

4
Goodwill Industries - Knoxville Inc

Goodwill industries-knoxville, inc. (the organization") is a nonprofit corporation. our mission at goodwill industries-knoxville, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, is changing lives and strengthening families by helping people reach…

Employment
5
The Remnant House

The remnant house, located in lee county, mississippi provides men and women with a faith-based christian transitional living home and recovery program. our christ-centered one year transitional living recovery program allows an individual…

Health
6
Holt Street Miracle Center

A community based recovery center that provides transitional and long term housng to our vecterans, ex-offendrs and those who are coming from drug additon programs needing housng

Human Services
7
Tennessee Kids Belong Inc

Tennessee Kids Belong dramatically improves the experiences and outcomes for children in foster care.

Human Services
8
Welcome House Knoxville

Our Mission at Welcome House Knoxville is to share the love of Jesus through the ministries of hospitality and friendship. We provide safe and loving homes for individuals and families in transition to permanent housing.

Housing & Shelter
9
Habitat for Humanity of Greater Nashville

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

10
The House That Mercy Built

Faith based residential program that will provide a safe environment for women to be transformed from teh inside out. a place that helps women bring order, accountability, and a strong spiritual foundation where there has been chaos, lack…

Religion
11
Knoxville Area Urban League Incorporated

Knoxville area urban league, inc.'s mission is to enable african americans, other minority groups and the underserved to secure economic self-reliance, parity, power and civil rights.

Human Services
12
Good Samaritan Mission Inc

To care for the needy, share the good news of jesus christ and change lives by providing counseling, life skill training, dignity gained through work and christ-centered discipleship.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Knoxville Habitat for Humanity Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CONNECT MINISTRIES — $20,000 · Human ServicesCONNECT MINISTRIESCARECUTS INC — $16,000 · Human ServicesCARECUTS INCOLIVE TREE EARLY LEARNING ACADEMY — $10,000 · Human ServicesOLIVE TREE EARLY LEARNING ACADEMYHEALING THE HOME — $19,210 · OtherHEALING THE HOMEALANO CLUB OF KNOXVILLE — $15,000 · OtherALANO CLUB OF KNOXVILLEKNOXVILLE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $5,000 · OtherKNOXVILLE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY I…DRUMS UP GUNS DOWN - AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAM — $5,000 · OtherDRUMS UP GUNS DOWN - AFTER SCHOO…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TENNESSEE VALL — $17,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS C…THE CHANGE CENTER — $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentTHE CHANGE CEN…KNOXVILLE LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 · ReligionKNOXVILLE …THE RESTORATION HOUSE — $15,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE RESTOR…SHANGRI-LA THERAPEUTIC ACADEMY OF RIDING INC — $10,000 · HealthSHANGRI-LA…American Heart Association Inc — $5,000 · HealthAmerican H…
Human Services$46,000Other$44,210Youth Development$19,500Religion$15,000Housing & Shelter$15,000Health$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCONNECT MINISTRIES — $20,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TENNESSEE VALL — $17,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCARECUTS INC — $16,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetSHANGRI-LA THERAPEUTIC ACADEMY OF RIDING INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetKNOXVILLE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHANGE CENTER — $2,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lawson Family FoundationTN15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lawson Family Foundation · Thompson Charitable Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Valentine Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Valentine Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Valentine Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph