Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Valenti Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$450
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$450
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$157kHuman Services$86kEducation$38kArts & Culture$31kYouth Development$30kReligion$10kScience & Tech$10kHousing & Shelter$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$450
Median grant
1
States reached
$198k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILD SAFE MICHIGAN$450
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $64k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%OUR NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEMY: $5k → 8%CHILD SAFE MICHIGAN: $19k → 8%CHILD SAFE MICHIGAN: $10k → 8%CHILD SAFE MICHIGAN: $10k → 8%CHILD SAFE MICHIGAN: $10k → 8%CHILD SAFE MICHIGAN: $7k → 8%CHILD SAFE MICHIGAN: $3k → 8%CHILD SAFE MICHIGAN: $450 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$300k · 8 repeat orgs$100k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +83% since the first grant, against +35% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
19

Total granted

$300k
$100k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+83%
+35%

Still filing today

38%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementHealthEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of Michigan
    5× · 2017–2021 · $155k · revenue +202%
  • CS
    CHILD SAFE MICHIGAN
    7× · 2017–2025 · $59k · revenue +83%
  • CT
    CROOKED TREE ARTS CENTER
    3× · 2017–2022 · $29k

Funded once

  • C
    CATCH
    one grant, 2020 · $21k
  • WM
    WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • HN
    HOLY NAME CATHOLIC CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Michigan State University College of Law

The mission of the michigan state university college of law is to provide a rigorous educational program which prepares a diverse community of students to be national and international leaders in private legal practice, business and…

—
2
Alumni Association of the University of Michigan

The Association is an independent worldwide organization that nurtures lifelong relationships with and among current and future Michigan alumni. As a committed partner of the University the Association offers programs of relevance and…

Education
3
Kalamazoo College

The mission of kalamazoo college is to prepare its graduates to better understand, live sucessfully within, and provide enlightened leadership to a richly diverse and increasingly complex world. as a highly selective, nationally renowened…

Education
4
Michigan Virtual University

Maximize learning and teaching by bringing together the best in people and technology.

Education
5
Michigan Colleges Alliance

Michigan Colleges Alliance is a collective of excellent independent colleges and universities located throughout Michigan. MCA helps students pursue their educational goals by organizing on campus tours, funding scholarships and connecting…

Education
6
Business Leaders for Michigan

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

—
7
Business Leaders for Michigan Foundation

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

Community Improvement
8
College for Creative Studies

The college for creative studies nurtures the creativity that is vital to the enrichment of modern culture. the college educates visual artists and designers, knowledgeable in varied fields, who will be leaders in creative professions that…

Education
9
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
10
Olivet College

To provide a unique liberal arts education allowing students to engage in both curricular and co curricular programs that combine real world experiences with lectures and service learning.

Education
11
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
12
Waldorf School Association of Mich

Detroit waldorf school is a nonprofit educational community whose mission is to inspire and empower a diverse population of students to reach their fullest potential as creative, collaborative, and responsible global citizens.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cranbrook Educational Community; the most unlike its peers is Kidsgala a David C Mcknight Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

University of Michigan: $155,150 · OtherUniversity of MichiganCROOKED TREE ARTS CENTER: $28,714 · OtherCROOKED TREE ARTS CENTERWOMEN OF TOMORROW MENTOR &: $28,500 · OtherWOMEN OF TOMORROW MENTOR &CATCH: $21,000 · OtherCATCHTHE CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF DETROIT CHRIST CHILD HOUSE: $20,000 · OtherTHE CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF DETROIT CHRIST CHILD HOUSEWESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · OtherHOLY NAME CATHOLIC CHURCH: $10,000 · OtherTHE COMMUNITY HOUSE: $10,000 · Other+9 more: $15,425 · OtherCHILD SAFE MICHIGAN: $58,862 · Human ServicesCHILD SAFE MICHIGA…OUR NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEMY: $5,000 · Human ServicesOUR NEIGHBORHOOD A…LIGHTHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY: $4,505 · Human ServicesLIGHTHOUSE OF OAKL…WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationWESTERN M…President and Fellows of Harvard College: $10,000 · EducationPresident…CRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY: $8,000 · EducationCRANBROOK…826NYC Inc: $6,000 · Education826NYC In…LASELL UNIVERSITY: $1,500 · EducationJunior League of Detroit: $5,000 · Community ImprovementKIDSGALA A DAVID C MCKNIGHT FOUNDATION: $1,500 · HealthLittle Traverse Conservancy Inc: $675 · Environment
Other$298,789Human Services$68,367Education$35,500Community Improvement$5,000Health$1,500Environment$675

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Michigan: $155,150 over 5y, 15% of budgetCHILD SAFE MICHIGAN: $58,862 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetWESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget826NYC Inc: $6,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetJunior League of Detroit: $5,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetOUR NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEMY: $5,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY: $4,505 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLASELL UNIVERSITY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIDSGALA A DAVID C MCKNIGHT FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetLittle Traverse Conservancy Inc: $675 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds CHILD SAFE MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds CRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds 826NYC Inc ↗
  • Who funds Junior League of Detroit ↗
  • Who funds OUR NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds LIGHTHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds LASELL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds KIDSGALA A DAVID C MCKNIGHT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Little Traverse Conservancy Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southeast MichiganMI13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Valenti Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Valenti Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Lasell University: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Valenti Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Valenti Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Valenti’s filings →

More from the funding graph