· Public charity
The United Way of Southeast Ms Inc
United way of southeast mississippi improves lives by mobilizing the caring power of communities around of southeast mississippi to advance the common good.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 64% of THE UNITED WAY OF SOUTHEAST MS INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k8 grants · $230k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $263k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHRISTIAN SERVICES INC | $143,000 |
| HOPE COMMUNITY COLLECTIVE | $60,000 |
| EDWARDS STREET FELLOWSHIP CENTER | $60,000 |
| KIDS HUB ADVOCACY CENTER | $40,000 |
| SHAFER CENTER FOR CRISIS INTERVENTI | $40,000 |
| CHILDREN'S CENTER FOR COMMUNICATION | $32,500 |
| ASSOC FOR THE RIGHTS OF CITIZENS | $30,000 |
| DUBARD SCHOOL FOR CHILDREN WITH LAN | $27,500 |
| DOMESTIC ABUSE FAMILY SHELTER | $25,000 |
| PINE BELT FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $15,190 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $648k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 20%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
20 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TATHE ARC SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI9× · 2017–2025 · $394k · revenue +50%
- ESEDWARDS STREET FELLOWSHIP CENTER INC8× · 2018–2025 · $385k · revenue +58%
- KHKIDS HUB8× · 2018–2025 · $248k · revenue +254%
Funded once
- TTHRIVEone grant, 2021 · $20k
- ANAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branchesgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $19k · revenue +46%
- RIRise Incgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +641% · 27% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide rehabilitative social services to the distressed, handicapped and underprivileged.
Dedicated to the promotion and protection of the general health and well being of children in chickasaw county, ms and surrounding areas by providing food, clothing, and other support for children and families in need.
To serve children in crisis throughout mississippi by providing strong, christian homes to every child who lives on campus while ensuring that each child is loved unconditionally and has their physical, spiritual, and emotional needs met.
To offer a christ centered way out of a seemingly hopeless situation for victims of domestic violence.
The christian mission centers seeks to meet the mental, physical, emotional, and spiritual needs of all people to whom we minister.
Delta streets ministries, inc. (dba delta streets academy) will equip young men for today and the future by providing a holistic education that promotes the highest achievement in academics and athletics, a biblical worldview, and…
Gods homeless haven ministries is a christ centered, 501c3 volunteer-run ministry that reaches out to men, women, and children who may be living in poverty or experiencing homelessness. we seek to be the first step in assisting them to…
To improve the lives of children and families by providing a continuum of compassionate, measurable, and effective behavioral health and social services by providing management services to mississippi children's home society and cares…
Provide services for at-risk youth, their families and other adults, and the neighboring community where they live. Services include after school tutoring and activities, life skills training, family activities, food distribution and…
To connect and coordinate united methodist volunteers and their christian friends with persons in need of humanitarian assistance and spiritual encouragement.
The remnant house, located in lee county, mississippi provides men and women with a faith-based christian transitional living home and recovery program. our christ-centered one year transitional living recovery program allows an individual…
Prevention of child abuse
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Domestic Abuse Family Shelter Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Shafer Center for Crisis Intervention. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Christian Services Inc of America ↗
- Who funds The Shafer Center for Crisis Intervention ↗
- Who funds THE ARC SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI ↗
- Who funds EDWARDS STREET FELLOWSHIP CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds KIDS HUB ↗
- Who funds DOMESTIC ABUSE FAMILY SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds Hope Community Collective ↗
- Who funds THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF HATTIESBURG MS ↗
- Who funds HATTIESBURG AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY I ↗
- Who funds PINE BURR AREA COUNCIL 304 ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF MISSISSIPPI ↗
- Who funds PINEBELT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MISSISSIPPI CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF GREATER MISSISSIPPI ↗
- Who funds PINEBELT CHRISTIAN WOMEN JOB CORP ↗
- Who funds EXTRA TABLE FEEDS INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds THE INSTITUTE FOR DIVERSE EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds Rise Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds R3SM INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Pinebelt Foundation · Louis Lou Ann and Melissa Poynter Family Foundation · Asbury Foundation of Hattiesburg Inc · Cadence Bank Foundation · Mississippi Power Foundation Inc · Community Foundation for Mississippi · Warren A Hood Jr Family Foundation · Mapp Family Foundation · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The United Way of Southeast Ms Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.