· Private foundation
Mississippi Power Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k37 grants · $119k
- $10k–50k27 grants · $547k
- $50k–250k8 grants · $587k
- $250k+3 grants · $946k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| University of Mississippi | $400,500 |
| United Way of South Mississippi | $295,969 |
| Mississippi State University Foundation | $250,000 |
| United Way of East Mississippi | $130,096 |
| Mississippi Aquarium | $125,000 |
| Open Doors Homeless Coalition | $80,000 |
| Mississippi State University | $51,600 |
| Hancock County Community Development Foundation | $50,000 |
| Main Street Pascagoula | $50,000 |
| Meridian Restoration Foundation Inc | $50,000 |
| Picayune Main Street | $50,000 |
| Boys & Girls Club of Southeast Region | $35,000 |
| East MS Business Development Foundation | $30,000 |
| South Central MS Consortium for Educational Excell | $30,000 |
| EXCEL by 5 Inc | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.
136 repeat relationships — 38 still active in FY2025, 98 since wound down; 37 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $968k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WCWilliam Carey University5× · 2017–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +111%
- MSMississippi State University Foundation Inc9× · 2017–2025 · $838k · revenue +153%
- UWUNITED WAY OF EAST MISSISSIPPIINC9× · 2017–2025 · $298k · revenue +23%
Funded once
- UDUNLIMITED DREAMS CHRISTIAN LEARNING CENTERone grant, 2024 · $125k · revenue +3% · 87% of their budget
- TPTHE PARTNERSHIP FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue ×86
- ETEXTRA TABLE FEEDS INCone grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Support the research activities of the university of mississippi medical center
The foundation was established to support the mississippi museum of natural science though receiving, maintaining and distributing funds exclusively for the benefit of the museum.
We remove barriers to opportunity through citizen action so all mississippians can flourish.
Promoting northeast mississippi for industrial growth.
The organization provides funding for medical research, educational programs for physicians and others as well as educational assistance for medical students. in addition, the organization provides grants to medical professionals whose…
Seeking to build relationships with diverse institutions around the state to build the power to effect political change in a non-partisan way while strengthening the institutions we engage with to help execute their institution's mission…
The mission of the organization is to promote mississippi.
To conduct fundraising efforts to help support and promote the activities, programs and projects of the mississippi department of archives and history.
To educate current and future leaders of the mississippi gulf coast and its communities and to research and identify solutions to economic, housing, educational, and workforce development issues associated with recovery and stability on…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Foundation of Mississippi and the most unlike its peers is Columbia-Marion County Development Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
171 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 171 of the 346 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds William Carey University ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF SOUTH MISSISSIPPI ↗
- Who funds Mississippi State University Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF EAST MISSISSIPPI ↗
- Who funds Catholic Social and Community Services ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY FOR JACKSONGEORGE & GREENE COUNTIES MS INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF EAST MISSISSIPPIINC ↗
- Who funds HANCOCK COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PICAYUNE MAIN STREET INC ↗
- Who funds AQUATIC RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WALTER ANDERSON MUSEUM OF ART INC ↗
- Who funds MAIN STREET PASCAGOULA ↗
- Who funds Mississippi Power Community Connection Inc ↗
- Who funds LYNN MEADOWS DISCOVERY CENTER ↗
- Who funds GULF COAST COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE UNITED WAY OF SOUTHEAST MS INC ↗
- Who funds MISSISSIPPI AQUARIUM ↗
- Who funds UNLIMITED DREAMS CHRISTIAN LEARNING CENTER ↗
- Who funds EAST CENTRAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PINEBELT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds MISSISSIPPI CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds THE PARTNERSHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds EXCEL BY 5 INC ↗
- Who funds EXTRA TABLE FEEDS INC ↗
- Who funds MISSISSIPPI COAST MODEL RAILROAD MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds Meridian Restoration Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION OF JONES COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Meridian Community College Foundation ↗
- Who funds EAST MISSISSIPPI BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CO ↗
- Who funds LAND TRUST FOR THE MISSISSIPPI COASTAL PLAIN ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Gulf Coast Community Foundation Inc · Community Foundation for Mississippi · Pinebelt Foundation · Phil Hardin Foundation · Ergon Foundation Inc · Leo W Seal Jr Family Foundation · The Riley Foundation · Community Foundation of East Mississippi · Mississippi Humanities Council Inc · The Paul and Sherry Broadhead Foundation · Engelstad Family Foundation · Cadence Bank Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Mississippi Power Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Mississippi Power Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Mississippi Power Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.