How much did THE UNITED WAY OF SOUTHEAST grant in FY2025?

THE UNITED WAY OF SOUTHEAST reported 11 grants totaling $493,657 in its FY2025 IRS filing.

Where is THE UNITED WAY OF SOUTHEAST based?

THE UNITED WAY OF SOUTHEAST is based in MS.

THE UNITED WAY OF SOUTHEAST

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

THE UNITED WAY OF SOUTHEAST

United way of southeast mississippi is a community leadership and impact organization whose mission is "to improve lives by leading and mobilizing the caring power of southeast mississippi." united way is a community-based organization serving the residents of forrest, lamar and perry counties and is governed by volunteers from this…

$494k

Granted FY2025

Grants

Communities

$143k

Largest

01What you fund

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 63% of THE UNITED WAY OF SOUTHEAST’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

$10k–50k8 grants · $230k
$50k–250k3 grants · $263k

$32,500

Median grant

States reached

$2.5M

Total assets

Largest grants

CHRISTIAN SERVICES INC$143,000
EDWARDS STREET FELLOWSHIP CENTER$60,000
HOPE COMMUNITY COLLECTIVE$60,000
SHAFER CENTER FOR CRISIS INTERVENTI$40,000
KIDS HUB ADVOCACY CENTER$40,000
CHILDREN'S CENTER FOR COMMUNICATION$32,500
ASSOC FOR THE RIGHTS OF CITIZENS$30,000
DUBARD SCHOOL FOR CHILDREN WITH LAN$27,500
DOMESTIC ABUSE FAMILY SHELTER$25,000
PINE BELT FOUNDATION$20,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$15,190

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $575k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22% — the area typically sits at 20%. 97% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$4.1M · 20 repeat orgs$78k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$4.1M

$78k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%

+23%

Still filing today

70%

50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthReligionPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

ES
EDWARDS STREET FELLOWSHIP CENTER
8× · 2018–2025 · $385k · revenue +94%
AF
ASSOC FOR THE RIGHTS OF CITIZENS
8× · 2018–2025 · $340k · revenue +50%
KH
KIDS HUB ADVOCACY CENTER
8× · 2018–2025 · $248k · revenue +79%

Funded once

T
THRIVE
one grant, 2021 · $20k
GS
GIRL SCOUTS (GULF PINE COUNCIL)
one grant, 2018 · $17k · revenue +11%
R
RISEgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +212% · 27% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Homes of Hope for Children Inc

To serve children in crisis throughout mississippi by providing strong, christian homes to every child who lives on campus while ensuring that each child is loved unconditionally and has their physical, spiritual, and emotional needs met.

Human Services

Southwest Mississippi Childrens Advocacy Center Inc

Child abuse prevention provide a safe place for child abuse victims and families to receive a comprehensive array of services, which include interviews, referral services, and on-site

Human Services

House of Grace

To offer a christ centered way out of a seemingly hopeless situation for victims of domestic violence.

Human Services

Mississippi Christian Family

To provide rehabilitative social services to the distressed, handicapped and underprivileged.

—

Mississippi Children's Home Services

To improve the lives of children and families by providing a continuum of compassionate, measurable, and effective behavioral health and social services by providing management services to mississippi children's home society and cares…

Human Services

Healing Hearts Child Advocacy

To provide resources and services for victims of child abuse and their non-offending caregivers and by advocating education to prevent child abuse in DeSoto County, Mississippi and the surrounding area.

Crime & Legal

Greater Chattanooga Christian Services Inc

Provide Group and Foster care for Homeless Children and Counseling

Human Services

United Methodist Volunteers in Miss

To connect and coordinate united methodist volunteers and their christian friends with persons in need of humanitarian assistance and spiritual encouragement.

Religion

Children's Refuge Ministries

Dedicated to the promotion and protection of the general health and well being of children in chickasaw county, ms and surrounding areas by providing food, clothing, and other support for children and families in need.

Food & Nutrition

Family Crisis Services of Nw Ms

To reduce the trauma of violence

Education

Child Evangelism Fellowship of Mississippi Inc

Our ministry vision is to reach Every Child Every Nation Every Day. We teach children the Gospel of Jesus Christ and disciple them in the Word of God.

—

Rise House Arkansas

Provide services to victims of domestic abuse & educate the community to work toward a solution to end family violence.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Domestic Abuse Family Shelter Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hope Community Collective. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

17/18

Grantees still filing

14/18

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$2,624,225Human Services$774,600Health$637,922Philanthropy$115,000Religion$7,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pinebelt FoundationMS28.9× affinity11 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pinebelt Foundation · Favre 4 Hope Foundation Inc · Community Foundation for Mississippi · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THE UNITED WAY OF SOUTHEAST funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: SOUTH NEW SUMMIT SCHOOL.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

high risk

2 years of Form 990 filings, no recent filing.

Legal standing

medium risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 471973823 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on SOUTH NEW SUMMIT SCHOOL, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
FlagSustained operations— No recent filing on record.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 88% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The United Way of Southeast?

Find your warmest path to The United Way of Southeast through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THE UNITED WAY OF SOUTHEAST

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The United Way of Southeast?

More from the funding graph

THE UNITED WAY OF SOUTHEAST

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The United Way of Southeast?

More from the funding graph