Skip to content
The United Way of Campbell County at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

The United Way of Campbell County

United way of campbell county mobilizes the power of the community by uniting resources, raising awareness, and empowering individuals.

$175k
Granted FY2019
8
Grants FY2019
1
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Human Services$240kHealth$81kYouth Development$69kCivil Rights$34kEmployment$32kCrime & Legal$15kEducation$6k
02FY2019 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $142,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $174,820 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $32,820 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Council of Community Services$60,000
Gillette Reproductive Health$25,000
Visitation and Advocacy Center$15,000
Gillette Area Refuge Foundation$10,000
Boy Scouts of America - Greater Wyoming$10,000
CLIMB Wyoming$10,000
Head Start$6,000
YES House$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CLIMB WYOMING: $11k → 9%CLIMB WYOMING: $10k → 9%CLIMB Wyoming: $10k → 9%YES HOUSE: $9k → 9%YES HOUSE: $8k → 9%YES House: $6k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$463k · 10 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2019, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
2

Total granted

$463k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+111%

Still filing today

90%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
Human ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementCivil RightsEducationYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    COUNCIL OF COMMUNITY SERVICES
    3× · 2017–2019 · $173k · revenue +36%
  • GR
    GILLETTE REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH
    3× · 2017–2019 · $63k · revenue +13%
  • GA
    GILLETTE ABUSE REFUGE FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2019 · $38k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2017 · $7k
  • WC
    WRIGHT COMMUNITY ASSISTANCEgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $6k · revenue +111%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Womens Resource Center

In working toward a society free from violence, the mission of the women's resource center is to address domestic and sexual violence and its impact on the community. the women's resource center serves the rural communities of beaverhead…

—
2
Sierra County Child Abuse Council

Child abuse awareness and prevention

Crime & Legal
3
Wetzel-Tyler Child Advocacy Center

To reduce the traumatic effects of abuse, protect children from maltreatment, seek justice for child victims, investigate abuse and strengthen the communitys awareness.

Human Services
4
The Women's Center Inc

To provide safety, shelter and support to empower all impacted by domestic abuse, sexual violence, child abuse & trafficking.

Human Services
5
Wyoming Women's Business Center

The wyoming women's business center strives to advance self-sufficiency by promoting economic justice and equality throughout wyoming. to achieve the mission, the wwbc provides services that foster the creation and expansion of small…

Community Improvement
6
Crisis Center of the Plains

To reduce the effects of family violence and sexual assault and to assist victims of these crimes through programs of support, education and advocacy.

Human Services
7
Ywca Clark County

Ywca clark county's mission is to eliminate racism, empower women, and promote peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all.

Human Services
8
Central Wyoming Counseling Center

To provide mental health and counseling services in wyoming through stewardship, innovation and compassion

Health
9
Women's Health Center of West Virginia Inc

The mission of the women's health center is to provide and to advocate for access to affordable, high quality health services, addressing the special needs of women in a manner that respects their dignity, right of reproductive choice,…

Civil Rights
10
Wright County Community Action Inc

Working in partnership with the community to empower residents to improve their physical, social and economic well-being. we work to alleviate the causes and conditions of poverty.

Human Services
11
Vermilion County Child Advocacy Center

Perform forensic interviews on minor children in response to calls from either the Department of Children and Family Services or law enforcement, regarding potential abuse of the child. The Center works as an advocate for the child with…

Crime & Legal
12
Ywca of Central Virginia

The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, dignity, and freedom for all.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wyoming Child & Family Development Inc; the most unlike its peers is Women's Resource Center of Northeas. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COUNCIL OF COMMUNITY SERVICES: $173,238 · Community ImprovementCOUNCIL OF COMMUNITY SERVICESGILLETTE ABUSE REFUGE FOUNDATION: $38,481 · Human ServicesGILLETTE ABUSE REFUGE …CLIMB DBA CLIMB WYOMING: $31,567 · Human ServicesCLIMB DBA CLIMB WYOMIN…YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES INC: $23,218 · Human ServicesYOUTH EMERGENCY SERVIC…GILLETTE REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH: $62,639 · HealthGILLETTE REPRODUCTI…WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF NORTHEAS: $18,117 · HealthWOMEN'S RESOURCE CE…VISITATION AND ADVOCACY CENTER FOR THE 6TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT: $48,920 · Civil RightsVISITATION …Greater Wyoming Council of the BSA: $26,362 · OtherGreater W…SALVATION ARMY: $7,225 · OtherSALVATION…WRIGHT COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE: $5,770 · OtherWRIGHT CO…WYOMING CHILD & FAMILY DEVELOPMENT INC: $21,580 · EducationBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CAMPBELL CO: $19,044 · Youth Development
Community Improvement$173,238Human Services$93,266Health$80,756Civil Rights$48,920Other$39,357Education$21,580Youth Development$19,044

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOUNCIL OF COMMUNITY SERVICES: $173,238 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetGILLETTE REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH: $62,639 over 3y, 8.2% of budgetVISITATION AND ADVOCACY CENTER FOR THE 6TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT: $48,920 over 3y, 5.3% of budgetGILLETTE ABUSE REFUGE FOUNDATION: $38,481 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetCLIMB DBA CLIMB WYOMING: $31,567 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetGreater Wyoming Council of the BSA: $26,362 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetYOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES INC: $23,218 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWYOMING CHILD & FAMILY DEVELOPMENT INC: $21,580 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CAMPBELL CO: $19,044 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetWOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF NORTHEAS: $18,117 over 2y, 2.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wyoming Community Fou…First Interstate Banc…United Way of Natrona…Wyoming Assn of Non P…Amazonsmile Foundation
Wyoming Community FoundationWY17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wyoming Community Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · United Way of Natrona County · Wyoming Assn of Non Profit Organizations dba Wyoming Nonprofit Network · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The United Way of Campbell County funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The United Way of Campbell County. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The United Way of Campbell County?

    Find your warmest path to The United Way of Campbell County through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2020) is on record but names no grant recipient (grants abroad are filed by region only, and grants under $5,000 are not itemized), so the figures above are from FY2019, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Campbell County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home