Wyoming · Nonprofit
VISITATION AND ADVOCACY CENTER FOR THE 6TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
VISITATION AND ADVOCACY CENTER FOR THE 6TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT (Wyoming) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $152,259 to it, the largest being National Court Appointed Special Advocate Association ($50,000). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
VISITATION AND ADVOCACY CENTER FOR THE 6TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT's funding base is broadening — from 1 funders to 3 as grant income climbed.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 814 civil rights nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Kappa Alpha Theta Foundation Incshared fundersportfolio match
- Oedekoven-Vicklund Foundationlocal
- Children's Advocacy Centers of Arkansasportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2018, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2018, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2018 46% · 2019 65% · 2020 56% · 2021 73% · 2022 52% · 2023 63% · 2024 63% · 2025 70%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
78% of VISITATION AND ADVOCACY CENTER FOR THE 6TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (99% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 3 funders, grant income rose $15k → $21k.
2 of 6 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 20% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of VISITATION AND ADVOCACY CENTER FOR THE 6TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
VISITATION AND ADVOCACY CENTER FOR THE 6TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT leans on a few funders — its largest provides 33% of grant income and the top three 85%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
98% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund VISITATION AND ADVOCACY CENTER FOR THE 6TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 60% · 2022 74% · 2023 52% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
57% of VISITATION AND ADVOCACY CENTER FOR THE 6TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT's grant income comes from Wyoming funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $30k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 6 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
- Kappa Alpha Theta Foundation Incshared fundersportfolio matchIN · backs 11 organizations that share your funders · its grantees resemble your mission
- Oedekoven-Vicklund FoundationlocalWY · funds 4 organizations near you
- Children's Advocacy Centers of Arkansasportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Tennessee Chapter of Children's Advocacyportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Alabama Network of Children's Advocacy Centers Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Ohio Network of Children's Advocacy Centersportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Children's Advocacy Centers of Texas Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- National Children's Alliance Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Sexually Abused Children's Relief Endeavor (Sacred)portfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Elgin Children's Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Children's Advocacy Centers of Georgia Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Kappa Alpha Theta Fraternity Group Returnportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like VISITATION AND ADVOCACY CENTER FOR THE 6TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Wyoming
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
77% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
99%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for VISITATION AND ADVOCACY CENTER FOR THE 6TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds VISITATION AND ADVOCACY CENTER FOR THE 6TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT?
- VISITATION AND ADVOCACY CENTER FOR THE 6TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT (Wyoming) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $152,259 to it, the largest being National Court Appointed Special Advocate Association ($50,000). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does VISITATION AND ADVOCACY CENTER FOR THE 6TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT have?
- IRS filings report 6 organizations giving $152,259 in grants to VISITATION AND ADVOCACY CENTER FOR THE 6TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, 5 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of VISITATION AND ADVOCACY CENTER FOR THE 6TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT?
- National Court Appointed Special Advocate Association is the largest funder on record, with $50,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like VISITATION AND ADVOCACY CENTER FOR THE 6TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Wyoming. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2018–2025), and the filings of 6funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing