Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Underwood Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$35k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$61kInternational$32kCrime & Legal$21kEducation$16kFood & Nutrition$15kHuman Services$12kArts & Culture$7kHousing & Shelter$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$446k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN ANGLICAN COUNCIL$6,000
OUTREACH COMMUNITY MINISTRIES$5,000
DAN MCKINNEY FAMILY YMCA$4,000
CHRISTIAN LEGAL SOCIETY$3,000
COVENANT HOUSE$2,800
NASHOTAH HOUSE$2,600
FOOD FOR THE POOR$2,500
HOPE INTERNATIONAL$2,000
MAP INTERNATIONAL$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES$1,400
ST STEPHEN'S CHURCH$500
INTL JUSTICE MISSION$500
COURTSIDE MINISTRIES$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 38% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $1k → 10%COVENANT HOUSE: $2k → 17%OUTREACH COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $5k → 7%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $690 → 10%COVENANT HOUSE: $2k → 17%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $690 → 10%COVENANT HOUSE: $1k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $1k → 17%OUTREACH COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $5k → 7%OUTREACH COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $5k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
IL
WI
MI
NY
PA
CA
CO
VA
KS
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$193k · 18 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
11

Total granted

$193k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+219%

Still filing today

50%
9%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OC
    OUTREACH COMMUNITY MINISTRIES
    3× · 2020–2025 · $15k · revenue +64%
  • CO
    CHINA OUTREACH MINISTRIESINC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $12k · revenue +8%
  • MAP International Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $11k · revenue +134%

Funded once

  • TM
    TRAILSIDE MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • CN
    CARE NETWORK
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • DC
    DAVID C COOK-GLOBAL MISSION
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
2
International Commission Inc

Equipping and enabling believers worldwide to conduct church-based evangelism projects to reach unbelievers and make disciples.

Religion
3
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
4
Global Outreach International Inc

To get the good news to every nation this generation by showing and sharing god's love by providing opportunities and supporting christian missionaries in over fifty seven countries around the world.

International
5
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of jesus christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
6
Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…

Religion
7
Global Media Outreach

Leveraging technology to invite all people to know jesus christ as savior and grow in a personal relationship with him.

Religion
8
Christian Healthcare Ministries Inc

To glorify god, show christian love, and experience god's presence as christians share each other's medical bills.

Religion
9
International Care Ministries

To free the poorest of the poor from physical, emotional and spiritual bondage.

Food & Nutrition
10
Challenge Ministries Us

The organization exists to spread the gospel of Jesus Christ while providing support and serving the poor through benevolent assistance, medical services, education, orphan care, church planting, etc.

International
11
Los Angeles Mission Inc

The los angeles mission breaks the cycle of homelessness and poverty, by stabilizing people in a safe and spiritual environment, connecting them to solutions and walking with them on their journey.

Housing & Shelter
12
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is International Justice Mission; the most unlike its peers is Covenant House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHRISTIAN LEGAL SOCIETY: $24,000 · OtherCHRISTIAN LEGAL SOCIETYAMERICAN ANGLICAN COUNCILE: $24,000 · OtherAMERICAN ANGLICAN COUNCILENASHOTAH HOUSE: $16,850 · OtherNASHOTAH HOUSEHOPE INTERNATIONAL: $14,070 · OtherHOPE INTERNATIONALIndividual grant recipient: $12,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHINA OUTREACH MINISTRIESINC: $11,500 · OtherCHINA OUTREACH MINISTRIESINCDAN MCKINNEY FAMILY YMCA: $9,356 · OtherDAN MCKINNEY FAMILY YMCACOVENANT PLAYERS: $5,380 · Other+15 more: $30,580 · Other+15 moreFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $15,830 · InternationalFOOD FOR THE POOR…MAP International Inc: $11,270 · InternationalMAP International…INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $4,190 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL JUS…MEDICAL AMBASSADORS INTERNATIONAL: $2,000 · InternationalMEDICAL AMBASSADO…OUTREACH COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $15,000 · Human ServicesOUTREACH COM…COVENANT HOUSE: $6,760 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOU…Episcopal Community Services: $2,380 · Human ServicesEpiscopal Co…AMERICAN ANGLICAN COUNCIL: $12,000 · Religion
Other$148,236International$33,290Human Services$24,140Religion$12,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $15,830 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOUTREACH COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN ANGLICAN COUNCIL: $12,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCHINA OUTREACH MINISTRIESINC: $11,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMAP International Inc: $11,270 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $6,760 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT PLAYERS: $5,380 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $4,190 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetEpiscopal Community Services: $2,380 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEDICAL AMBASSADORS INTERNATIONAL: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRESTORATION MINISTRIES INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗
  • Who funds OUTREACH COMMUNITY MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ANGLICAN COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds CHINA OUTREACH MINISTRIESINC ↗
  • Who funds MAP International Inc ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT PLAYERS ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds Episcopal Community Services ↗
  • Who funds MEDICAL AMBASSADORS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds RESTORATION MINISTRIES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA11.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Underwood Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Underwood Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Underwood’s filings →

More from the funding graph