Skip to content
The Tyler L Rigg Memorial Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Tyler L Rigg Memorial Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$119k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$154kEducation$114kHuman Services$113kScience & Tech$78kInternational$65kCrime & Legal$60kEnvironment$56kArts & Culture$46kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k14 grants · $58k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $61k
$5,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HORIZONS - THE FOOTE SCHOOL$15,100
DIMENSIONS ED RESEARCH FDN$15,000
REDSIDE FOUNDATION$11,000
NATIVE MOVEMENT$10,000
FLY FOUNDATION$10,000
MICHIGAN BREASTFEEDING NETWORK$9,000
MULTIPLIER$8,000
CENTER FOR WHOLE COMMUNITIES$7,500
NORTHERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY$6,000
WOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL$5,000
LAWYERS COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS$5,000
NAMI MAINE$5,000
DEEP MEDICINE CIRCLE$4,500
SUPERIOR ARTS YOUTH THEATRE$3,500
SUN VALLEY YOUTH HOCKEY$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $64k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOUR CHILDREN: $2k → 13%YOU GOTTA BELIEVE: $2k → 20%MICHIGAN BREASTFEEDING NETWORK: $15k → 16%WILTON VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE CORPS: $400 → 9%MICHIGAN BREASTFEEDING NETWORK: $10k → 16%MICHIGAN BREASTFEEDING NETWORK: $10k → 16%MICHIGAN BREASTFEEDING NETWORK: $10k → 16%MICHIGAN BREASTFEEDING NETWORK: $9k → 16%MICHIGAN BREASTFEEDING NETWORK: $6k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
ID
IL
MI
NY
MA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
NE
MD
AZ
NM
DC
HI
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$713k · 27 repeat orgs$106k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
36

Total granted

$713k
$88k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+18%

Still filing today

67%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MB
    MICHIGAN BREASTFEEDING NETWORK
    6× · 2019–2024 · $60k · revenue +271%
  • LT
    LAND TOGETHER DBA INSIGHT GARDEN PROGRAM
    5× · 2017–2021 · $58k · revenue +160%
  • RF
    REDSIDE FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $52k · revenue +221%

Funded once

  • BC
    BAY CLIFF HEALTH CAMPgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $11k · revenue +65%
  • KC
    KLINGBERG COMPREHENSIVE FAMILY SERVICES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $11k · revenue +58%
  • TP
    TRAILS PROGRAM
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boulder Watershed Collective

The Boulder Watershed Collective is a 501c3 non-profit stakeholder-driven organization established to address forested watershed health,resiliency and stewardship. We have three program areas: ClimateAdaptation and Resilience Watershed…

Environment
2
Vermont Network Against Domestic an Sexual Violence Inc

The vermont network aims to uproot the causes of domestic and sexual violence in vermont and create a world free of oppression where actions, beliefs and systems support all people to thrive. we accomplish this through our key programs…

Human Services
3
The Climate Center

The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.

Education
4
Climate Foundation

To research and develop healthy climate solutions comprising global food security, ecosystem regeneration and carbon balance in seas and soils.

Science & Tech
5
Toxic-Free Future F/K/a Washington Toxics Coalition

As a national leader in environmental health research and advocacy, toxic- free future uses the power of science, education, and activism, to drive strong laws and corporate responsibility that protect the health of all people and the…

Environment
6
Work on Climate

Supporting industry transformation towards climate-positive and make green careers transitions and driving the adoption of green workforce development practices broadly.

Environment
7
Gardens for Health International

Gardens for Health International works to provide lasting agricultural solutions to chronic childhood malnutrition

International
8
New Roots Institute

New Roots Institute is a nonprofit empowering the next generation with knowledge and training to end factory farming.

Food & Nutrition
9
National Alliance On Mental Illness of Massachusetts Inc

We seek to improve the quality of life for people living with mental health conditions, their families, and their caregivers. we work to ensure that all people impacted by a mental health condition receive the support they need when they…

Health
10
Nami Colorado

Nami colorado offers educational programs designed to educate and support family members, friends and individuals affected by mental illness. we aim to develop skills to help people cope with the challenges of mental illness. we advocate…

Health
11
The Network Advocating Against Domestic Violence

The Network is a group of 40+ member organizations dedicated to improving the lives of those impacted by gender-based violence through education, public policy and advocacy, and connecting community members with direct service providers.…

Human Services
12
Women Winning

To encourage, promote, support, and elect pro-choice women of all political parties to all levels of public office in minnesota.

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Klingberg Comprehensive Family Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Start the Cycle. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/41
Grantees still filing
26/41
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $78,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDIMENSIONS ED RESEARCH FDN: $57,000 · OtherDIMENSIONS ED RESEARCH FDNIndividual grant recipient: $38,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSUPERIOR ARTS YOUTH THEATRE: $32,500 · OtherSUPERIOR ARTS YOUTH THEATREFLY FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherHORIZONS - THE FOOTE SCHOOL: $15,100 · OtherMARSHALL CHESS FOUNDATION INC: $26,000 · OtherMARSHALL CHESS FOUNDATION INCNATIVE MOVEMENT: $20,000 · Other+42 more: $138,500 · Other+42 moreREDSIDE FOUNDATION: $52,300 · HealthREDSIDE FOUNDATIO…FLY FOUNDATION INC: $48,500 · HealthFLY FOUNDATION IN…Deep Medicine Circle: $10,000 · HealthDeep Medicine Cir…NAMI MAINE: $10,000 · HealthNAMI MAINE+3 more: $6,000 · HealthMICHIGAN BREASTFEEDING NETWORK: $60,000 · Human ServicesMICHIGAN …TIDES CENTER: $8,000 · Human ServicesTIDES CEN…+3 more: $4,400 · Human Services+3 moreWOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL: $25,000 · InternationalCOLORADO HAITI PROJECT INC: $25,000 · InternationalPeace Development Fund: $10,000 · InternationalLAND TOGETHER DBA INSIGHT GARDEN PROGRAM: $57,500 · Crime & LegalCENTER FOR WHOLE COMMUNITIES INC: $27,000 · EnvironmentMULTIPLIER: $16,000 · EnvironmentAMAZON FRONTLINES: $8,000 · EnvironmentCARE ABOUT CLIMATE INC: $2,500 · EnvironmentWOMEN & FAMILY LIFE CENTER INC: $42,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$425,100Health$126,800Human Services$72,400International$60,000Crime & Legal$57,500Environment$53,500Arts & Culture$42,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMICHIGAN BREASTFEEDING NETWORK: $60,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetLAND TOGETHER DBA INSIGHT GARDEN PROGRAM: $57,500 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetREDSIDE FOUNDATION: $52,300 over 8y, 8.0% of budgetFLY FOUNDATION INC: $48,500 over 6y, 25% of budgetWOMEN & FAMILY LIFE CENTER INC: $42,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetCENTER FOR WHOLE COMMUNITIES INC: $27,000 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetMARSHALL CHESS FOUNDATION INC: $26,000 over 4y, 72% of budgetWOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL: $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOLORADO HAITI PROJECT INC: $25,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetNATIVE MOVEMENT: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMULTIPLIER: $16,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBAY CLIFF HEALTH CAMP: $11,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetKLINGBERG COMPREHENSIVE FAMILY SERVICES INC: $11,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDeep Medicine Circle: $10,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetLawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI MAINE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPeace Development Fund: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLoveland Youth Gardeners: $9,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetGROWE FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetAMAZON FRONTLINES: $8,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTIDES CENTER: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAVIELLE FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetUNION THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Alliance on Mental Illness of Vermont Inc: $4,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetVERMONT ADAPTIVE SKI AND SPORTS: $4,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSUN VALLEY JUNIOR HOCKEY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHOUR CHILDREN INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOU GOTTA BELIEVE - THE OLDER CHILD ADOPTION & PERMANENCY MOVEMENT INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TOMORROW FUND: $1,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREENWOOD WILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNAMI Rhode Island: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVOICES FOR CHILDREN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GUILFORD FOUNDATION INC: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILTON VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE CORPS INC: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT HAWAII INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION BOULDER COUNTY: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MICHIGAN BREASTFEEDING NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds LAND TOGETHER DBA INSIGHT GARDEN PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds REDSIDE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FLY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN & FAMILY LIFE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR WHOLE COMMUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds MARSHALL CHESS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO HAITI PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIVE MOVEMENT ↗
  • Who funds MULTIPLIER ↗
  • Who funds BAY CLIFF HEALTH CAMP ↗
  • Who funds KLINGBERG COMPREHENSIVE FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Deep Medicine Circle ↗
  • Who funds Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law ↗
  • Who funds NAMI MAINE ↗
  • Who funds Peace Development Fund ↗
  • Who funds Loveland Youth Gardeners ↗
  • Who funds GROWE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMAZON FRONTLINES ↗
  • Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
  • Who funds AVIELLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNION THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY ↗
  • Who funds National Alliance on Mental Illness of Vermont Inc ↗
  • Who funds VERMONT ADAPTIVE SKI AND SPORTS ↗
  • Who funds SUN VALLEY JUNIOR HOCKEY INC ↗
  • Who funds CARE ABOUT CLIMATE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Colorado Gives Founda…ImpactassetsincThe Denver FoundationGe Aerospace Foundati…The Pfizer Foundation…Paypal Charitable Giv…Renaissance Charitabl…Network for GoodAmerican Endowment Fo…National Philanthropi…Donor Advised Charita…
Community Foundation Boulder CountyCO13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation Boulder County · Colorado Gives Foundation · Impactassetsinc · The Denver Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Tyler L Rigg Memorial Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Tyler L Rigg Memorial Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Vermont Adaptive Ski and Sports: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
18report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 71 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tyler L Rigg Memorial’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home